The Conception of Co-dependent Arising (pratītya samutpāda) in Pāli Canon

 
PIIS000523100001905-9-1
DOI10.31857/S000523100001905-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Postgraduate student
Affiliation: History of Foreign Philosophy Department, faculty of Philosophy, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameVoprosy filosofii
EditionIssue 11
Pages202-212
Abstract

Pāli canon may show us patterns of philosophy concepts’ developing in the early Buddhist textual tradition. Special sections of article are devoted to characteristics of nidāna in Buddhist texts and to problem of possibility of pratītya samutpāda formal notation. In the end of article author writes about the contemporary research position on deference between Buddhist notion of causality and European approach. In view of interpretation of all these aspects of pratītya samutpāda investigation the author makes a conclusion about philosophical significance of this fundamental theoretical principle in the Buddhist religious and philosophical system. 

Keywordsearly Buddhism, causality, pratītya samutpāda, nidāna, schools of early Buddhism, Pāli canon, bodhi
Received18.12.2018
Publication date19.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 1871

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Catuṣpariṣatsūtra 2008 – Catuṣpariṣatsūtra ed. by J. Gippert, Frankfurt, 2008, http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/texte/etcs/ind/aind/bskt/cps/cps.htm

2. Kathāvatthu 1891 – Kathāvatthu ed. by A.C.Taylor, London: Pali Text Society, Oxford University Press, 1891.

3. The Kathāvatthu 1961 – The Kathāvatthu, general editor Bhikkhu J. Kashyap, Pali Publication Board (Bihar Government), 1961.

4. Bucknell, R.S. (1999) Conditioned Arising Evolves: Variation and Change in Textual Accounts of the Paṭicca-sammuppāda Doctrine // JIABS, v. 22, № 2, pp. 311–342.

5. Bareau, A. (2005) Buddhist Sects of the Lesser Vehicle, tr. by G.M. Chodron, https://suvacobhikkhu.wordpress.com/buddhist-sects/

6. Dependent Origination (2016), web., Barre Centre for Buddhist Studies. 8-10 April, 2016, http://www.leighb.com/Dobcbs.pdf

7. Lamotte, E. (1980) Conditioned Co-production and Supreme Enlightenment // Balasooriya, S, Bareau, A., Gombrich, R., Gunasinghe, S., Mallawarachchi, U., Perry, E. (ed.), Buddhist Studies in Honour of Walpola Rahula, Gordon Fraser Gallery, London, pp. 118–132.

8. Lysenko, Victoria G., Terentiev, Andrey A., Shohin, Vladimir K. (1994) Early Buddhist Philosophy. Jaina Philosophy, Vostochnaya Literatura RAN, Moscow (in Russian).

9. Kalupahana, David J. (1975) Causality: The Central Philosophy of Buddhism, Honolulu.

10. Macy, J.R. (1979) Dependent Co-arising: The Distinctiveness of Buddhist Ethics // The Journal of Religious Ethics, vol. 7, № 7 (Spring, 1979), pp. 38–52.

11. Rhys-Davids, T.W. (2005) Pali-English Dictionary, Chicago. Articles Paccaya, p. 712, Paṭicca-samuppāda, p. 730.

12. Ronkin, N. (2005) Early Buddhist Metaphysics. The Making a Philosophical Tradition, Oxford centre for Buddhist studies, Routledge Curzon, chapter 5 Causation as the handmaid of metaphysics: from the paṭiccasamuppāda to Paṭṭhāna, pp. 193–244.

13. Stcherbatsky, Fyodor. I. (1988) Selected Works on Buddhism. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

14. Vertogradova, V. (1990) Clay Tablets with Indian Texts from Khisht-Tepa // International Association for the Study of Culture of Central Asia. Information Bulletin, № 17, pp. 21–31.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up