In article the problem of “a scientism” of philosophical and humanitarian texts which, according to the author, distorts sense of humanitarian culture as expressions of human subjectivity and freedom is considered. The author believes that pseudoscientific forms of presentation are imposed to philosophy and other humanitarian researches, on the one hand, in the information and algorithmic way of transfer and maintaining modern knowledge, with another – bureaucratization of the sphere of the theory. Need to give short retelling of the main ideas in the summary, the requirement of extensive citing and a large number of references on a sample of texts of natural sciences, imputation to the philosophical text of substantiality in the spirit of physical or technical researches – all this is considered as violation of specifics of existence and development of a humanitarian thought. The author is sure that the philosophy and other humanitarian disciplines cannot and should not conform to these requirements which in many respects are result of the market relations focused on sale of the text. Philosophy – not science as physics. It, as well as all sphere of humanitarian knowledge, is expression of human subjectivity and such quality as freedom. In it it is talked about objects which are not reduced to the empirical world: she builds metaphysical concepts and addresses depths of a human soul. Therefore the judgments stated by it and opinions cannot be checked as knowledge made by science. Unprovability and basic discrepancy – fundamental properties of philosophy and humanitarian studies which it often penetrates. The philosophy – expression of the personal beginning, it is always deeply individual, the myth which we do not formalize therefore one of the most adequate forms of philosophy – an essayistics is the cornerstone of philosophizing.