Actual problems of buddhist studies in the researches of scientists of the Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

 
PIIS086919080028703-0-1
DOI10.31857/S086919080028703-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Academician of RAS; director, the Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMBTS SBRAS)
Affiliation: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMBTS SBRAS)
Address: Russian Federation, Ulan-Ude
Occupation: Chief Researcher
Affiliation: Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the SB RAS
Address: 6, Sakhyanova str., 670047, Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation
Occupation: Chief Research Scientist
Affiliation: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMBTS SB RAS)
Address: Sakhyanovoi Str. No 6 670047 Ulan-Ude Republic of Buryatia Russia
Journal nameVostok. Afro-Aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost
EditionIssue 6
Pages205-216
Abstract

The article analyzes Buddhist studies conducted by scientists of the Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The issues of the emergence and formation of the institution itself, its main divisions of the institute and the activities of the leading scientists of the institute related to collecting, cataloging and studying written monuments that are kept in the funds of the unique Center of oriental manuscripts and xylographs are considered. The contribution and results of the researches of philosophers, historians, ethnographers, literary critics and linguists engaged in the study of traditional religious culture, rites and rituals, Buddhist philosophy, as well as the features of the socio-political processes of the development of Buddhism in Russia and the countries of Central and East Asia are examined. 

The legal status of the Buddhist church, monasteries and clergy is considered on the basis of the analysis and translation of a number of archival documents and sources in the Mongolian language, and a brief assessment of the current state, role and influence of the Buddhist church, culture and traditions on society is given. The history of translation activities, in particular, the translation of the Buddhist canon into Mongolian from Tibetan, is highlighted.

Attention is drawn to the methods and means of electronic cataloging of written monuments in the Tibetan and ancient Mongolian languages, archival documents developed at the institute, as well as methods for digitizing multimedia sources of technotronic information.

It is noted that modern Buddhist monasticism, as well as lay Buddhists in Russia, maintain loyalty and trust in relation to the institutions of state power and law at a fairly high level.

The place and role of ethnicity in the historical past and modern social processes are studied, a new view of the key moments of the ethno-political history of the Buryat people in their inextricable connection with the general development of Russian statehood and society is substantiated.

It is concluded that the Buddhist studies conducted by scientists of the IMBT SB RAS are aimed at solving urgent problems in the field of religious relations, cultural and social development, and international relations.

 
KeywordsBuddhist philosophy, religious studies of Buddhism, digitalization of monuments in Tibetan and ancient Mongolian
Keywords list (other)Статья подготовлена в рамках государственных заданий: проект «Россия и Внутренняя Азия: динамика геополитического, социально-экономического и межкультурного взаимодействия (XVII–XXI в.)», № 121031000243–5 и проект «Письменные традиции народов Байкальского региона в контексте историко–культурного наследия России и Внутренней Азии», № 121031000263–3.
Received21.11.2023
Publication date26.12.2023
Number of characters21135
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной
1 Буддология изначально находилась в центре исследовательских интересов ИМБТ СО РАН, поскольку ученые, выдвинувшие идею института, основанного в 1922 г.: Б.Б. Барадин, Ц.Ж. Жамцарано, Г.Ц. Цыбиков были всемирно известными и признанными специалистами в этой области. Особенностью подхода к буддологическим исследованиям в ИМБТ было совмещение традиционных основ буддийского образования и европейской научной методологии. Этим институт выгодно отличался от всех, даже самых крупных, мировых буддологических центров.
2 Выпускники Санкт-Петербургского университета Ц.Ж. Жамцарано, Г.Ц. Цыбиков, Б.Б. Барадин по инициативе и при активном содействии Русского географического общества и Комитета по изучению Средней Азии совершили ряд путешествий по Тибету и Монголии. Труды, подготовленные по материалам этих исследований, сразу же получили мировую известность. [Барадин, 1908; 1924; Жамцарано, 2001; Цыбиков, 1903; 1919].
3 Последующие поколения бурятских буддологов, тибетологов и монголоведов, получившие профессиональную подготовку также, в основном в стенах Ленинградского (Санкт-Петербургского) университета, сконцентрировали свои усилия на проблемах источниковедения и историографии, изучении культуры Тибета и монгольских народов, вопросах тибетской и монгольской филологии, языкознания, фольклористики, проблемах этнографии и археологии Центральной Азии и Сибири, истории Монголии, Тибета и сопредельных стран, философских проблемах буддизма и др. ИМБТ был первым и единственным научным учреждением, принявшим в свой штат буддийских монахов.
4 На раннем этапе работы института осуществлялась первичная инвентаризация и каталогизация книг на тибетском, старомонгольском, бурятском языках и архивных документов, уцелевших после разрушения дацанов с богатейшими библиотеками литературы на тибетском и старомонгольском, многие из которых, в том числе комплекты разных изданий тибетского канона, печатные и рукописные, были привезены из Центрального, Восточного Тибета и Монголии. Собранные в разных хранилищах Республики и Иркутской области книги и рукописи, к 1960-м гг. сконцентрированные в Рукописном отделе БКНИИ, находились в разрозненном, не систематизированном состоянии. Первичную трудоемкую работу по их классификации, систематизации и комплектации сотрудники Института проделали вместе с бывшими ламами, принятыми на работу в БИОН во второй половине 1960-х гг.
5 Значительный объем работы по описанию тибетского фонда был выполнен Б.Д. Дандароном, Л.-Ж. Ямпиловым, П.И. Хадаловым, опубликовавшими ряд описаний тибетских рукописей и ксилографов [Хадалов, Ямпилов, Дандарон, 1962; Дандарон, 1960; 1965].
6 В короткий срок была проделана большая работа по созданию тибетско-русских словарей и переводу важных текстов буддийского канона. Ученик академика Ф.И. Щербатского – Б.В. Семичов издал в соавторстве с А.Ф. Гаммерман, Ю.М. Парфионовичем и Б.Д. Дандароном несколько тибетско-русских словарей [Семичов, Гаммерман, 1963; Семичов, Парфионович, Дандарон, 1963].

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 105

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Abaeva L.L. Religious Culture of Mongolian Peoples in the Vector of Buddhist Traditions. Ulan-Ude: Buryad-Mongol Nom, 2018 (in Russian).

2. Atlas of Tibetan Medicine. Set of ill. to Tibetan Medical Treatise of the XVII Century “Blue Beryl”. Album. / BSC SB RAS, et al. Moscow: Galart, 1994 (in Russian).

3. Ayusheeva D.V. Modern Tibetan Buddhism in the West. Ed. by L.E. Yangutov. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2003 (in Russian).

4. Ayusheeva M.V. Mergen-Gegen and his Written Heritage. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSKHA, 2015 (in Russian).

5. Bazarov A.A. Institute of Philosophical Dispute in Tibetan Buddhism. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 1998 (in Russian).

6. Bazarov A.A. The Source of Sages. Section: Logic (Translated from Tibetan). Saint Petersburg: B&K, 2001 (in Russian).

7. Bazarov B.V., Tumendemberel N. Mongolian-Russian Relations at the Present Stage: to the Problem of Regional Interaction in Inner Asia. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2005 (in Russian).

8. Baradin B.B. Travel to Lavran. RGS Proceedings. 1908. Vol 44. Issue IV. Saint Petersburg (in Russian).

9. Baradin B.B. Statue of Maitreya in the Golden Temple. (Bibl. Buddhica. Vol. XXI). Leningrad: Printing house of the RAS, 1924 (in Russian).

10. Buryats in the Ethnopolitical Space of Russia: from Empire to Federation (Project Leader, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences B.V. Bazarov). Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2017 (in Russian).

11. Vanchikova Ts.P. History of Buryat Buddhism. Written Sources: Transliteration, Translation, Commentary and Research by Ts.P. Vanchikova. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2006 (in Russian).

12. Vanchikova Ts.P. Buddhism in Mongolia: History, Clergy, Monasteries. Irkutsk: Ottisk, 2019 (in Russian).

13. Garry I.R. Dzogchen and Chan in the Tibetan Buddhist Tradition. Ed.: V.I. Kornev, V.S. Dylykova. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2003 (in Russian).

14. Dandaron B.D. Description of Tibetan Manuscripts and Woodcuts. Issue 1. M.: Vostochnaya Literatura, 1960; Issue. 2. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 1965 (in Russian).

15. Dandaron B.D., Pubaev R.E. The Source of Sages. Tibetan-Mongolian Dictionary of Buddhism. Sections “Paramita” and “Madhyamika”. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Book Publ., 1968 (in Russian).

16. Donets A.M. Doctrine of Truth in the Philosophy of the Madhyamika–Prasangika School of the Gelug Tradition. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS 2012 (in Russian).

17. Donets A.M. Middle Cognition in the Gelug Buddhist tradition. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2016 (in Russian).

18. Zhabon Y.Zh. Brief Tibetan-Russian Medical Dictionary with Mongolian Equivalents. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2008 (in Russian).

19. Zhabon Y.Zh. Annotated Catalog of the Medical Collection of the Tibetan Fund of the Center of Oriental Manuscripts and Xylographs of The Institute of Mongolian, Tibetan and Buddhist studies. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2012 (in Russian).

20. Zhamtsarano Ts.Zh. Travel Diaries. 1903–1907. Compiled and ed. by Ts.P. Vanchikova, V.Ts. Lyksokova, I.V. Kulganek. Ulan–Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2001 (in Russian).

21. The Land of Vajrapani: Buddhism in Buryatia (Comp. and ed. by Ts.P. Vanchikova). (Ars Buddhica, vol. 4). M: “Design. Information. Cartography” Publishing House, 2008 (in Russian).

22. Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 100 years. Volume I. Ed. by B.V. Bazarov. Irkutsk: Ottisk, 2022 (in Russian).

23. Lepekhov S.Yu. Formation of Religious-Philosophical and Logical-Epistemological Concepts of Mahayana Buddhism. Ed. by B.V. Bazarov. Irkutsk: Ottisk, 2022 (in Russian).

24. Nesterkin S.P. Personality in Mahayana Buddhism. Ed. by S.Yu. Lepekhov. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2011 (in Russian).

25. Laity and Lamas: Buddhist Ideas and Practices in the Transforming Societies of Russia and Mongolia. Ed. by L.L. Abaeva. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2019 (in Russian).

26. Pagsam-Jonsan: History and Chronology of Tibet. Translation from Tibetan, Preface, Commentary by R.E. Pubaev. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991 (in Russian).

27. Pagsam-Zhongsan – monument of Tibetan historiography of the XVIII century. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1981.

28. The Realities of Monastic Life in the Buddhism of Mongolia and Buryatia. Ed. A.A. Bazarov. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo Buryat State University, 2017 (in Russian).

29. Rinchinov O.S. Diachronic Corpus of the Buryat language as a Digital Tool for Historical Research: Approaches, Solutions, Experimental Studies of Space. Historical Informatics. 2020. No 2(32). Pp. 26–34 (in Russian).

30. Rinchinov O.S. Tibetan Heritage in the Digital Space: Approaches and Implementations. Oriental Studies. 2020. Vol. 13. № 3. Pp. 640–651 (in Russian).

31. Semichov B.V., Gammerman A.N. Dictionary of Tibetan-Latin-Russian Names of Medicinal Plant Raw Materials Used in Tibetan Medicine. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Complex Research Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1963 (in Russian).

32. Semichov B.V., Parfionovich Yu.M., Dandaron B.D. Brief Tibetan-Russian Dictionary. Moscow: State Publishing House of Foreign and National Dictionaries, 1963 (in Russian).

33. Urbanaeva I.S. Formation of Tibetan and Chinese Mahayana: in the Context of the Problem of Authentic Buddhism. Ulan-Ude: Izdatel’stvo BSC SB RAS, 2014 (in Russian).

34. Khadalov P.I., Yampilov L.Zh., Dandaron B.D. Description of the Works of Gunchen-Zhamyan-Shadpa-Dorje (1649–1723). Ulan-Ude: Buryat Publishing House, 1962 (in Russian).

35. Tsybikov G.Ts. Buddhist pilgrim at the Shrines of Tibet. Petrograd: Rus. Geogr. Soc., 1919 (in Russian).

36. Tsybikov G.Ts. On Central Tibet. RGS Proceedings. Vol. 39. Issue. 3. Saint Petersburg, 1903 (in Russian).

37. Yangutov L.E. Unity, Identity and Harmony in the Philosophy of Chinese Buddhism. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian Publishing Company of the RAS, 1995 (in Russian).

38. Yangutov L.E. Traditions of Prajnaparamita in China. Ulan-Ude: Buryat State University, 2007 (in Russian).

39. Bazarov A.A. Catalogue of the collection of Tibetan manuscripts and xylographs “Chos grwa” (Part ‘Tshad ma, Grub mtha’) of The Institute of Mongolian, Tibetan and Buddhist studies of RAS (Siberian Branch). Tibeto-Mongolian Series. Varanasi: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, 2008.

40. Bazarov A.A., Tsyrempilov N. Catalogue of Tibetan gSung 'bum Collection of the Centre of Oriental Manuscripts and Xylographs of the Institute of Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan studies of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences. Volume I. Non-dGe lugs and Early dGe lugs sections. Ulaanbaatar: Center for Mongolian Studies of the National University of Mongolia, 2008.

41. Bazarov B.V. The Transborder Regions of Siberia and East Asia: The problems of Regional Paradiplomacy. Asiatic Russia. Partnerships and Communities in Eurasia. Kolkata: Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies. 2009. Рp. 256–268.

42. Bazarov B.V. Relationship between Inner Mongolia and Mongolia. Himalayan and Central Asian Studies. New Delhi, 2010. Vol. 14. No. 1–2. Pp. 117–124.

43. Bolsokhoeva N.D. with Avedon J., Bradley T.S., Gerasimova K.M., Neyer F. The Buddha’s Art of Healing. Tibetan Paintings Rediscovered. New-York: Rizzoli, 1998.

44. Lepekhov S.Yu. The Religious Policy of the Russian Government towards Buddhism at the End of the 19th and the Beginning of the 20th Centuries. International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture (Korea). February 2013. Vol. 20. Pp. 145–161.

45. Lepekhov S.Yu. Historical and Cultural Role of Indian Mitra and Maitreya Cults in the Uniting Process of Eurasia. Eurasia and India. Regional Perspectives. Chapter 2. Ed. By K. Warikoo. London – New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 2018. Pp. 13–20.

46. Nesterkin S.P. Renewal Movement in Russian Buddhism: Two Reform Projects. A Copter Approach the Trans Himalayan Tibet: Buddhism at The Crossroads. Edited by Tsetan Namgial. New Delhi, India: Manakin Press Pvt. Ltd., 2017. Vol. 3. Pp. 157–164.

47. Nesterkin S. Buddhist Religious Organizations of Russia (On Certain Problems Related to their Formation). Contemporary Buddhism. Comparative Studies on Eurasia and South Asia. Ed. By S. Chatterjee, A. Sen Gupta. Kolkata: Shipra publication, 2011. Pp. 41–50.

48. Manzanov G.E. Buddhism in the Baikal Region (Based on the Sociological Research Materials). Contemporary Buddhism. Comparative Studies on Eurasia and South Asia. Ed. By S. Chatterjee, A. Sen Gupta. Kolkata: Shipra, 2011. Pp. 51–63.

49. Vanchikova Ts. Rnam Thars of the First Abbots of the Buryat Tsugol Monastery. Archiv Orientalni. Vol. 71. No 3. Praha, 2003. Pp. 451–464.

50. Vanchikova Ts. Religious Codes of Mongolian Buddhist Monasteries. Aspects of Mongolian Buddhism 2. Mongolian Buddhism in Practice. Budapest 2020. Pp. 167–173.

51. Zhabon Yu.Zh. Desi Sangye Gyatsho (1653–1705) on the Succession of Medical Knowledge in the Tibetan Chang and Zur Schools. Archiv Orientalni. Vol. 71. No 3. Praha, 2003. Pp. 465–478

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up