Observations on the Birth and Development of the Sasanian Rock Reliefs Craft Tradition

 
PIIS086919080009887-2-1
DOI10.31857/S086919080009887-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: University of Bologna
Address: Italy, Bologna
Journal nameVostok. Afro-Aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost
EditionIssue 3
Pages82-97
Abstract

The group of the Sasanian rock reliefs is one of the most important documents to understand the ideology of the Sasanian dynasty of Iran (from the 3rd to the 7th century AD) because the main role is played by the king, represented in various actions: investiture, or gift of the khwarrah by a deity; homage to the king by the family and dignitaries; king and his entourage; victory and triumph over the king's enemies; individual equestrian battles. Initially, scholars were mainly interested in the interpretation of the motifs represented and the identification of the characters who animated the scenes, based on the comparison with the monetary portraits, identified by a legend. Moreover, the figurative language of the reliefs is not entirely clear, and sometimes it is quite difficult to interpret complex scenes safely. The codes, expressed by the postures, gestures, hairstyles and attributes of the characters, which were clear to contemporaries, often appear enigmatic to us.

However, the purpose of this work is not to discuss the different interpretations proposed for the iconographic motifs, but to study the theme of the birth and development of this or these craft traditions, with a methodology that starts from the assumption that the complex technical aspects underlying their production characterize the works of art in relation to the skills shared by the craftsmen of the different «production centers»: they are linked to a school that keeps a certain tradition alive, with a slow evolution, on which, however, an external agent can act quickly.

KeywordsIran, the Sasanian dynasty, rock reliefs, tradition craftsmanship, sculpture
Received28.05.2020
Publication date22.06.2020
Number of characters55352
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной
1 The group of rock reliefs represents one of the most important documents for understanding the ideology of the Sasanian dynasty, the last of the ancient Eastern empires [Harper, 1986, p. 585] but at the same time one of the foundations of the subsequent medieval Islamic civilization.
2 Mainly on account of the richness of their themes and iconographic motifs, a powerful visual counterpart to the textual sources on this dynasty, the large panels of monumental appearance soon have started to arise the interest of scholars.
3 Thirty-nine Sasanian rock reliefs are known: thirty are located in Fars, in the south of the Iranian Plateau, six others are in Taq-e Bostan, near Kermanshah, in the western part of the Plateau; one relief is at Salmas in the West Azerbaijan province of Iran, in the north-western part of the Plateau, while the last relief was discovered in 2002 in Bactria, in northern Afghanistan. Finally, a relief initially in Ray, near Tehran, is known only from 19th century drawings.
4 The reliefs are concentrated in the first two centuries of the dynasty, the 3rd and 4th centuries; no reliefs are known for the 5th and 6th centuries, until the advent of King Khusraw II, at the end of the 6th-first quarter of the 7th century.
5 On the Sasanian rock reliefs, the main role is played by the king. The subjects of the representations are thus: the investiture, or bestowal of the khwarrah – the royal power of divine origin – to the king by a deity; the homage paid to the king by his family and dignitaries; the king and his entourage; the victory and triumph over the king’s enemies; equestrian fights with the king engaged.
6 But unlike the Roman bas-reliefs, which were the part of the urban architecture and celebrated historical actions, the Sasanian rock reliefs were more often sculpted in isolated or at any rate barely accessible places, and in positions that didn’t allow for a close-up view. They were always near a water point – maybe now dried up – because water was considered to be the element of residence of khwarrah [Callieri, 2006(2)].
7 It is therefore clear that their main function was not to visually tell the people important events in the king’s career: for this function the reliefs would need to be easily accessible. On the contrary, the location of the reliefs indicates that they intended to evoke meanings of a spiritual, even magical nature [Vanden Berghe, 1983, p. 58]: they were not testimonies of actual episodes of historical nature but rather symbolic and magical representations, also if they depict events. At the same time, they did not have an expressly religious function, for religious iconography is absent: deities were indeed represented only with the sole function of enhancing royal dignity.
8 Obviously, the aspects that initially captured the researchers’ interest were mainly the interpretation of the motifs represented and the identification of the characters animating the scenes, the latter being rarely completed by inscriptions. Thanks to the comparison with the portraits depicted on coin obverses, on which the Sasanian rulers are always represented with a personal crown and identified by a legend, it was relatively easy to identify the ruler on a large part of the reliefs, and thus to propose interpretations for the various scenes on the basis of the knowledge of the political history of the dynasty.
9 On the other hand, the reliefs’ figurative iconographic language is not self evident, and a safe interpretation of complex scenes at times is difficult [Vanden Berghe, 1980]. The language expressed by the postures, hairstyles and attributes of the characters, which was clear to the contemporaries, often appears enigmatic to modern observers.
10 In spite of the vast bibliography on the subject, we are still far from having reached a broad overall consensus on many of the aspects relating to Sassanid rock reliefs.
11 Numerous recent studies, on isolated reliefs or on specific themes, have brought about sometimes substantial modifications to what can be considered as the communis opinio, expressed by the positions presented by the Belgian archaeologist Louis Vanden Berghe in the catalogue of the 1983 photographic exhibition «Reliefs rupestres de l’Iran ancient» [Vanden Berghe, 1983] and shared by one of the latest overviews on this subject [Canepa, 2013, p. 862–863] .
12 From the point of view of the interpretations of the iconographies of the reliefs, therefore, an overall work of comparative evaluation of the new interpretations against those of the communis opinio, even those hitherto considered to be certain, would be necessary, with preference to a global approach that seeks to identify the codes of the language of the Sasanian reliefs, both at grammatical and syntactical level, as suggested by A. Soudavar [Soudavar, 2009].
13 However, the purpose of the present work is not to discuss the different interpretations proposed for the iconographic motifs, not only because the subject is so vast that it would require a monographic study but also because most of the existing studies have already concentrated onto this subject.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 932

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alram M., Gyselen R. Sylloge Nummorum Sasanidarum Paris – Berlin – Wien, Band I, Ardashir I. – Shapur I. (Veröffentlichungen der numismatischen Kommission, 41) Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2003.

2. Barsanti C., Paribeni A. La scultura in funzione architettonica a Costantinopoli tra V e VI secolo: aspetti tecnici, tipologici e stilistici. Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia. 2018. Vol. 30. Pp. 23–72.

3. Callieri P. At the Roots of Sasanian Royal Imagery: The Persepolis Graffiti. Ērān ud Ānērān. Studies Presented to Boris Il’ič Maršak on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday. Eds.: M. Compareti, P. Raffetta, G. Scarcia. Venezia: Cafoscarina, 2006(1). Pp. 129–148.

4. Callieri P. Water in the Art and Architecture of the Sasanians. Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the Societas Iranologica Europaea. Eds.: I. A. Panaino, A. Piras. Milano: Mimesis, 2006(2). Pp. 339–349.

5. Callieri P. L’archéologie du Fārs à l’époque hellénistique. Quatre leçons au Collège de France 8, 15, 22 et 29 mars 2007 (Persika, 11). Paris: de Boccard, 2007.

6. Callieri P. Les Sassanides étaient-ils les héritiers des Achéménides? L’évidence archéologique. Un impaziente desiderio di scorrere il mondo. Studi in onore di Antonio Invernizzi per il suo settantesimo compleanno (Monografie di Mesopotamia, XIV). Eds.: C. Lippolis, S. De Martino. Firenze: Le Lettere, 2011. Pp. 187–200.

7. Callieri P. Architecture et représentations dans l’Iran sassanide (Studia Iranica, Cahiers 50). Paris: Association pour l’Avancement des Etudes iraniennes, 2014.

8. Callieri P. Cultural Contacts Between Rome and Persia at the Time of Ardashir I (c. AD 224–40). Sasanian Persia Between Rome and the Steppes of Eurasia. E.W. Sauer (ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017. Pp. 221–238.

9. Canepa M.P. The Two Eyes of the Earth. Art and Ritual of Kingship between Rome and Sasanian Iran. Berkeley–Los Angeles–London: University of California Press, 2009.

10. Canepa M.P. Technologies of Memory in Early Sasanian Iran: Achaemenid Sites and Sasanian Identity. American Journal of Archaeology. 2010. Vol. 114 (4). Pp. 563–596.

11. Canepa M.P. Sasanian Rock Reliefs. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran. Ed. by D.T. Potts. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. 856–877.

12. Canepa M.P. The Iranian Expanse: Transforming Royal Identity through Architecture, Landscape, and the Built Environment, 550 BCE–642 CE. Oakland, CA: University of California, 2018.

13. Compareti M. Observations on the Rock Reliefs at Taq-i Bustan: A Late Sasanian Monument along the “Silk Road. The Silk Road. 2016. Vol. 14. Pp. 71–83.

14. Dignas B., Winter E. Rome and Persia in Late Antiquity. Neighbours and Rivals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

15. Dresken-Weiland J. Sculpture, Relief. The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antique. Ed. by O. Nicholson. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. P. 1345.

16. Edwell P. Between Rome and Persia: The Middle Euphrates, Mesopotamia and Palmyra under Roman Control. London-New York: Routledge, 2008.

17. Edwell P. Sasanian Interactions with Rome and Byzantium. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran. Ed. by D.T. Potts. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. 840–855.

18. Erdmann K. Das Datum des Tāķ-i Bustān. Ars Islamica. 1937. Vol. IV. Pp. 79–97.

19. Erim K.T., Roueché C.M. Sculptors from Aphrodisias: Some New Inscriptions. Papers of the British School at Rome. 1982. Vol. 50. Pp. 102–115.

20. Fıratlı N. La sculpture byzantine figurée au Musée Archéologique d’Istanbul (Bibliothèque de l’Institut Français d’Études Anatoliennes d’Istanbul, XXX). Paris: Librarie d'Amérique et d'Orient Adrien Maisonneuve, 1990.

21. Gall H. von. Das Reiterkampfbild in der iranischen und iranisch beeinflußten Kunst parthischer und sasanidischer Zeit (Teheraner Forschungen V). Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1990.

22. Gall H. von. New Perspectives on Sasanian Rock Reliefs. Current Research in Sasanian Archaeology. Art and History. Proceedings of a Conference Held at Durham University, November 3rd and 4th, 2001. Eds.: D. Kennet, P. Luft. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2008. Pp. 149–161.

23. Harper P.O. Silver Vessels of the Sasanian Period. Vol. 1: Royal Imagery. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1981.

24. Harper P.O. Art in Iran. V. Sasanian Art. Encyclopaedia Iranica. II.6. London – New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986. Pp. 585–594 (updated 2011).

25. Harper P.O. Geographical Location and Significant Imagery: Taq-e Bostan. Coins, Art, and Chronology. Essays on the pre-Islamic History of the Indo-Iranian Borderlands. Eds.: M. Alram, D.E. Klimburg-Salter. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1999. Pp. 315–319.

26. Herrmann G. Early Sasanian Stoneworking: a Preliminary Report. Iranica Antiqua 1981. Vol. XVI. Pp. 151–160.

27. Herrmann G. Description and Commentary. The Sasanian Rock Reliefs at Naqsh-i Rustam. Naqsh-i Rustam 6, The Triumph of Shapur I (Together with an Account of the Representation of Kerdir) (Iranische Felsreliefs, I. Iranische Denkmäler, Lieferung 13 enthaltend Reihe II). Berlin: D. Reimer Verlag, 1989. Pp. 13–33.

28. Herrmann G. The Rock Reliefs of Sasanian Iran. Mesopotamia and Iran in the Parthian and Sasanian Periods: Rejection and Revival c. 238 BC – AD 642. Proceedings of a Seminar in Memory of Vladimir G. Lukonin. Ed. by J. Curtis London, British Museum, 2000. Pp. 35–45.

29. Herzfeld E. La sculpture rupestre de la Perse sassanide. Revue des arts asiatiques 1928. Vol. 5. Pp. 129–142.

30. Herzfeld E. Khusrau Parwēz und der Ţāq i Vastān. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran. 1938. Vol. 9. Pp. 91–158.

31. Hinz W. Altiranische Funde und Forschungen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969.

32. Huff D. Der Takht-i Nishin in Firuzabad. Mass-Systeme Sasanidischer Bauwerke I. Archäologischer Anzeiger. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1972. Pp. 517–540.

33. Huff D. Formation and Ideology of the Sasanian State in the Context of Archaeological Evidence. The Sasanian Era. The Idea of Iran. Vol. 3. Eds.: V. Sarkhosh Curtis, S. Stewart. London: I.B. Tauris, 2008. Pp. 31–59.

34. Kaim B. Investiture or Mithra. Towards a New Interpretation of the so-called Investiture Scenes in Parthian and Sasanian Art. Iranica Antiqua. 2009. Vol. XLIV. Pp. 403–415.

35. Kawami T.S. Monumental Art of the Parthian Period in Iran (Acta Iranica, 26). Leiden: Brill, 1987.

36. Kawami T.S. Parthian and Elymaean Rock Reliefs. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran. Ed. by D.T. Potts. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. 751–765.

37. Kettenhofen, E. Die Eroberung von Nisibis und Karrhai durch die Sasaniden in der Zeit Kaiser Maximins (235/236 n. Chr.). Iranica Antiqua. 1995. Vol. 30. Pp. 159–177.

38. Lukonin V.G. Culture of Sasanian Iran. Iran in the 3rd–5th cc. Essays on the History of Culture. Moscow: Izdatel’sto vostochnoi literatury, 1969 (in Russian).

39. Lukonin V.G. Art Of Ancient Iran. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1977 (in Russian).

40. Lukonin V.G. Iran in the 3rd Century. New Materials and Experience of Historical Reconstruction Moscow: Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury, 1979 (in Russian).

41. Lukonin V.G., Dandamaev M.A. Review of: Walter Hinz. Altiranische Funde und Forschungen. Вerlin, 1969. Vestnik drevnei istorii (Journal of Ancient History). 1971. No. 3. Pp. 157–165 (in Russian).

42. Luschey H. Zur Datierung der sasanidischen Kapitelle aus Bisutun and des Monuments von Taq-i-Bostan. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran. Neue Folge I, 1968. Pp. 129–142.

43. Luschey H. Ardašīr I. ii. Rock Reliefs. Encyclopaedia Iranica. II (3). 1986. Pp. 377–380, available at http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ardasir-ii (reviewed 2011).

44. Luschey H. Taq-i Bustan. Bisutun. Ausgrabungen und Forschungen in den Jahren 1963–1967. Eds.: W. Kleiss, P. Calmeyer. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1996. Pp. 121–127.

45. MacDermot B.C. Roman Emperors in the Sasanian Reliefs. Journal of Roman Studies. 1954. Vol. 44. Pp. 76–80.

46. Mackintosh M.C. Roman Influences on the Victory Reliefs of Shapur I of Persia. California Studies in Classical Antiquity. 1973. Vol. 6. Pp. 181–203.

47. Mackintosh M.C. Taq-i Bustan and Byzantine Art. A Case for Early Byzantine Influence on the Reliefs of Taq-i Bustan. Iranica Antiqua. 1980. Vol. XIII. Pp. 149–177.

48. Meyer M. Die Felsbilder Shapurs I. Jahrbuch des deutschen archäologischen Institut. 1990. Bd. 105. Pp. 237–302.

49. Mode M. Art and Ideology at Taq-i Bustan: The Armoured Equestrian. Arms and Armour as Indicators of Cultural Transfer. The Steppes and the Ancient World from Hellenistic Times to the Early Middle Ages. Eds.: M. Mode, J. Tubach. Wiesbaden: Dr Ludwig Reichert Verlag, 2006. Pp. 393–413.

50. Monneret de Villard U. L’arte iranica. Milano: Biblioteca Moderna Mondadori, 1954.

51. Movassat J.D. The Large Vault at Taq-i Bustan: A Study in Late Sasanian Royal Art. Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen Press, 2005.

52. Nylander C. Ionians in Pasargadae. Studies in Old Persian Architecture (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis – Boreas. Uppsala Studies in Ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern Civilizations, 1). Uppsala: Universitetsbibliotek, 1970.

53. Orsatti P. Materials for a History of the Persian Narrative Tradition. Two Characters: Farhād and Turandot. Venezia: Edizioni Ca' Foscari, 2019.

54. Overlaet B. And Man Created God? Kings, Priests and Gods on Sasanian Investiture Reliefs. Iranica Antiqua. 2013. Vol. XLVIII. Pp. 313–354.

55. Prusac M. From Face to Face: Recarving of Roman Portraits and the Late-antique Portrait Arts. Leiden: Brill, 2010.

56. Russo E. La scultura di S. Polieucto e la presenza della Persia nella cultura artistica di Costantinopoli nel VI secolo. Atti del convegno internazionale “La Persia e Bisanzio” (Roma, 14–18 ottobre 2002) (Atti dei Convegni Lincei, 201). Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 2004. Pp. 737–826.

57. Sinisi F. Sources for the History of Art of the Parthian Period: Arsacid Coinage as Evidence for Continuity of Imperial Art in Iran. Parthica. 2013. Vol. 16. Pp. 9–60.

58. Soudavar A. The Vocabulary and Syntax of Iconography in Sasanian Iran. Iranica Antiqua. 2009. Vol. XLIV. Pp. 417–460.

59. Tanabe K. Date and Significance of the So-Called Investiture of Ardashir II and the Images of Shapur II and III at Taq-e Bustan. Orient. 1985. Vol. XXI. Pp. 102–121.

60. Tanabe K. Identification of the King of Kings in the Upper Register of the Larger Grotte, Taq-i Bustan: Ardashir III Restated. Ērān ud Ānērān. Studies Presented to Boris Il’ič Maršak on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday. Eds.: M. Compareti, P. Raffetta, G. Scarcia. Venezia: Cafoscarina, 2006. Pp. 129–148.

61. Trümpelmann L. Das Sasanidische Felsrelief von Dārāb. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, 1975.

62. Trümpelmann L. Sar-i Pol-i Zohab. Die Felsreliefs I–IV. Die Parthischen Felsreliefs. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer, 1977.

63. Vanden Berghe L. Lumière nouvelle sur l’interprétation de reliefs sassanides. Iranica Antiqua. 1980. Vol. XV. Pp. 269–282.

64. Vanden Berghe L., ed. Reliefs rupestres de l’Irān ancien. Bruxelles: Musées Royaux d'Art et d'Histoire, 1983.

65. Wootton W., Russell B., Rockwell P. (2013). Stoneworking Techniques and Processes (version 1.0). The Art of Making in Antiquity: Stoneworking in the Roman World. http://www.artofmaking.ac.uk/content/essays/3-stoneworking-techniques-and-processes-w-wootton-b-russell-p-rockwell/ (accessed: 25.04.2020).

Callieri colour illustrations 1 (Vostok-3-20-VKLADKA.Callieri_1.pdf, 1,622 Kb) [Download]

Callieri colour illustrations 2 (Vostok-3-20-VKLADKA.Callieri_2.pdf, 714 Kb) [Download]

Callieri colour illustrations 3 (Vostok-3-20-VKLADKA.Callieri_3.pdf, 3,266 Kb) [Download]

Callieri colour illustrations 4 (Vostok-3-20-VKLADKA.Callieri_4.pdf, 3,971 Kb) [Download]

Callieri colour illustrations 5 (Vostok-3-20-VKLADKA.Callieri_5.pdf, 915 Kb) [Download]

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up