The development of Anatolian hieroglyphs in the context of Hittite-Luwian bilingualism

Publication type Article
Status Published
Occupation: Leading Research Fellow, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameVostok. Afro-Aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost
EditionIssue 6

The Empire of Hattusa (frequently referred to as the Hittite Empire in earlier literature) was situated on the territory of present-day Turkey and northern Syria and saw its heyday in the fourteenth and thirteenth centuries BCE. A peculiarity of the sociolinguistic situation in the Empire of Hattusa was the simultaneous use of two writing systems: the cuneiform and the Anatolian hieroglyphs (also called Hittite or Luwian hieroglyphs in earlier publications). Contrary to a number of hypotheses about the development of Anatolian hieroglyphs on the periphery of Asia Minor, among the Luwian native speakers, this paper strives to demonstrate that its evolution took place in Hattusa, in the bilingual Hittite and Luwian environment. The research methodology consists, on the one hand, of the stratification of the available Anatolian hieroglyphic inscriptions and, on the other hand, of studying acrophonic derivations underlying the values of Anatolian syllabograms. The final part of the paper addresses the causes that could motivate the rulers of Hattusa to deploy and develop the system of Anatolian hieroglyphs, even though the cuneiform script was already available. The author concludes that this policy was an attempt at cultural self-assertion against the background of the more developed written tradition of Ancient Mesopotamia.

KeywordsEmpire of Hattusa, Hittite, Luwian, Anatolian hieroglyphs, acrophonic analysis
Publication date27.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 1321

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Hittite Scribes in the Light of Recent Research. Vestnik RGGU. 2013. No. 17. Pp. 102–127 (in Russian).

2. Alp, S. Zylinder- und Stempelsiegel aus Karahöyük bei Konya. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1968.

3. Boehmer, R. M., Güterbock, H. G. Glyptik aus dem Stadtgebiet von Boğazköy. Berlin: Mann, 1987.

4. Börker-Kähn, J. Archäologische Anmerkungen zum Alter des Bild-Luwischen. Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Hittitologia. Ed. O. Carruba et al. Pavia: Gianni Iuculano, 1995. Pp. 39–55.

5. Carruba, O. Tahurwaili von Hatti und die hethitische Geschichte um 1500 v.Chr.G. Anatolian Studies Presented to Hans Gustav Güterbock on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday. Ed. K Bittel et al. Istanbul: Nederlands Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut in het Nabije Oosten, 1974. Pp. 73–93.

6. Ehringhaus, H. Götter, Herrscher, Inschriften. Die Felsreliefs der Hethitischen Grossreichzeit in der Türkei. Mainz: von Zabern, 2005.

7. Goedegebuure, P. The Cuneiform Luwian Adverb zanda ‘together, down’. Acts of the VIIth International Congress of Hittitology (Çorum, August 25–31, 2008). Ed. A. Süel. Ankara: Anıt, 2010. Pp. 299–318.

8. Güterbock, H. G. Review of Die Welt der Hethiter by Margarete Riemschneider [Stuttgart: G. Kilpper, 1954]. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung. 1956. No. 51. Pp. 512–522.

9. Güterbock, H. G. Notes on Some Luwian Hieroglyphs. Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins. Ed. J. Jasanoff et al. Innsbruck: Institut der Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck, 1998. Pp. 201–204.

10. Hackett, A. Phoenician and Punic. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the World’s Ancient Languages. Ed. R. Woodard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. 365–385.

11. Hawkins, J. D. Writing in Anatolia: Imported and Indigenous Systems. World Archaeology. 1956. No. 17/3. Pp. 363–374.

12. Hawkins, J. D. The Hieroglyphic Inscription of the Sacred Pool Complex at Hattusa (SÜDBURG). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1995.

13. Hawkins, J. D. Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions. Vol. I. Part I, II: Texts; Part III: Plates. Berlin–New York: W. de Gruyter, 2000.

14. Hawkins, J. D. “Scripts and Texts”. The Luwians. Ed. H. C. Melchert. Leiden: Brill, 2003. Pp. 128–169.

15. Hawkins, J. D. Commentaries on the Readings. Herbordt 2005. Pp. 248–313.

16. Hawkins, J. D. Review of Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language by Ilya Yakubovich [Leiden, Brill, 2010]. Kadmos. 2013. No. 52/1. Pp. 1–18.

17. Herbordt, S. Die Prinzen- und Beamtensiegel der hethitischen Grossreichszeit auf Tonbullen aus dem Nişantepe-Archiv in Hattusa. Mainz: von Zabern, 2005.

18. Houwink ten Cate, Ph. H. J. The Bronze Tablet of Tudhaliyas IV and its Geographical and Historical Relations. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, 1992. No. 82. Pp. 233–270.

19. Marazzi, M. Ma gli ittiti scrivevano veramente su “legno”? Miscellanea di studi linguistici in onore di Walter Belardi. Ed. P. Cipriano et al. Rome: Calamo, 1994. Pp. 131–160.

20. Melchert, H. C. Anatolian Historical Phonology. Amsterdam–Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994.

21. Melchert, H. C. Language. The Luwians. Ed. H. C. Melchert. Leiden: Brill, 2003. Pp. 170–210.

22. Miller, J. Studies in the Origins, Development and Interpretation of the Kizzuwatna Rituals. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2004.

23. Mora, C. La glittica anatolica del II millennio A.C: Classificazione tipologica. Pavia: Gianni Iuculano, 1987.

24. Mora, C. Sull’origine della scrittura geroglifica anatolica. Kadmos. 1990. No. 30. Pp. 1–28.

25. Morpurgo-Davies, A. “To put” and “to stand” in the Luwian Languages. Studies in Memory of Warren Cowgill (1929–1985). Ed. C. Watkins. Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1987. Pp. 205–228.

26. Mouton, A. Glyptique cappadocienne et hieroglyphes anatoliens. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici. 2002. No. 44/1. Pp. 83–113.

27. Neumann, G. System und Aufbau der hethitischen Hieroglyphenschrift. Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, philologisch-historische Klasse. 1992. No. 1992/4. Pp. 25–48.

28. Oreshko, R. Hieroglyphic inscriptions of Western Anatolia: Long arm of the Empire or vernavular traditions? Luwian Identities: Culture, Language and Religion between Anatolia and the Aegean. Ed. A. Mouton et al. Leiden: Brill, 2013. Pp. 343–420.

29. Otten, H. Ein Siegelabdruck Duthalijaš I. Archäologischer Anzeiger. 2000. Pp. 375–376.

30. Payne, A. Writing Systems and Identity. Anatolian Interfaces: Hiitites, Greeks, and Their Neighbors in Ancient Anatolia. Ed. B. J. Collins et al. Oxford: Oxbow, 2008. Pp. 117–122.

31. Symington, D. Late Bronze Age Writing Boards and Their Uses: Textual Evidence from Anatolia and Syria. Anatolian Studies. 1991. No. 41. Pp. 111–123.

32. Van den Hout, Th. Institutions, Vernaculars, Publics: the Case of Second-Millenium Anatolia. Margins of Writing, Origins of Cultures. Ed. S. Sanders. Chicago: Oriental Institute, 2006. Pp. 217–256.

33. Waal, W. They wrote on wood. The case for a hieroglyphic scribal tradition on wooden writing boards in Hittite Anatolia. Anatolian Studies. 2011. No. 61. Pp. 21–34.

34. Waal, W. Writing in Anatolia: The Origins of the Anatolian Hieroglyphs and the Introductions of the Cuneiform Script. Altorientalische Forschungen. 2012. No. 39. Pp. 287–315.

35. Weeden, M. Hittite Logograms and Hittite Scholarship. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2011.

36. Yakubovich, Ilya. Hittite-Luvian Bilingualism and the Origin of Anatolian Hieroglyphs. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. 2008. No. 4/1. Pp. 9–36.

Система Orphus