[Review of the book:] I. A. Seržant, B. Wiemer (eds.). Contemporary approaches to dialectology: The area of North, North-West Russian and Belarusian dialects. Bergen: University of Bergen, 2014

 
PIIS0373658X0000979-5-1
DOI10.31857/S0373658X0000979-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation:
Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow, 119019; 101000
Journal nameVoprosy Jazykoznanija
EditionIssue 2
Pages139-147
Abstract

             

Keywords
Received06.03.2017
Publication date06.03.2017
Number of characters56
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
1 ….

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 824

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Zhivov 1984 — Zhivov V. M. Rules and pronunciation in the 11—13 c. Russian Church Slavonic orthography. Russian Linguistics. 1984. Vol. 10. Pp. 291—306.

2. Zhivov 2012 — Zhivov V. M. On the use of a bookish pattern in the East Slavic literary texts (the verb byti with present participle). Schnittpunkt Slavistik: Ost und West im wissenschaftlichen Dialog. Festgabe für Helmut Keipert zum 70. Geburtstag. Teil 3. Podtergera I. (Hrsg.). Bonn: Bonn Univ. Press, 2012. Pp. 235—249.

3. Mengel’2007 — Mengel’ S. The action in progress as expressed in the language of the Eastern Slavs. Voprosy jazykoznanija. 2007. No. 6. Pp. 14—31.

4. Nedyalkov 1983 — Nedyalkov V. P. (ed.). Tipologiya rezul’tativnykh konstruktsii [A typology of resultative structures]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1983.

5. Petrukhin 2007 — Petrukhin P. V. Zhili-byli: is the issue closed? Russkij yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii. No. 2 (14). Pp. 268—282.

6. Sitchinava 2013 — Sitchinava D. V. Tipologiya plyuskvamperfekta. Slavyanskii plyuskvamperfekt [A typology of pluperfect. Slavic pluperfect]. Moscow: AST-PRESS, 2013.

7. Trubinskii 1970 — Trubinskii V. I. On participation of the postpositive particle to in the complex sentence construction (based on the material of Pinega idioms). Severnorusskie govory. Meshcherskii N. A. (ed.). Leningrad: Leningrad State Univ., 1970. Pp. 48—66.

8. Trubinskii 1984 — Trubinskii V. I. Ocherki russkogo dialektnogo sintaksisa [Essays on Russian dialectal syntax]. Leningrad: Leningrad State Univ., 1984.

9. Sheveleva 2015 — Sheveleva M. N. Some considerations concerning the book by D. V. Sitchinava “A typology of pluperfect. Slavic pluperfect”. Russkij yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii. No. 2 (30). Pp. 181—210.

10. Shevel’ov 2002 — Shevel’ov Ju. V. Portrety ukrai’ns’kyh movoznavciv [The portraits of Ukrainian linguists]. Kyi’v: Vyd. dim «Kyjevo-Mogyljans’ka Akademija», 2002.

11. Dahl 1985 — Dahl Ö. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.

12. Piskorz et al. 2013 — Piskorz J., Abraham W., Leiss E. Doppelter Grammatikalisierungszyklus und funktionale Universalgrammatik: Am Beispiel des analytischen Perfekts und des Präteritums in der Sprachgeschichte des Polnischen. Die Welt der Slaven. 2013. Vol. LVIII. Pp. 276—307.

13. Squartini 1999 — Squartini M. On the semantics of the pluperfect: Evidence from Germanic and Romance. Linguistic typology. 1999. No. 3. Pp. 51—89.

14. Tatevosov, Ivanov 2009 — Tatevosov S., Ivanov M. Event structure of non-culminating accomplishments. Tense-Aspect-Mood systems cross-linguistically. De Hoop H., Hogeweg L., Malchukov A. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. Pp. 81—130.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up