Morphosyntax of Non-Standard Constructions with To Čto in Colloquial Russian

The paper presents a corpus study of non-normative constructions with to čto in Colloquial Russian. These constructions are not only used in subordination, they can also occur as a head of an independent sentence; in clauses that are linked to another clause by the rhetorical relation of Topic, Background or Cause; in constructions to, čto kasaetsja / nazyvaetsja / sčitaetsja. In this paper we try to determine the factors that restrict the use of these constructions in sentential complementation: the semantics of the dependent clause (fact, event and other semantic types of complement clauses); the lexico-syntactic factor (the argument structure of the complement-taking predicate), stylistics and sociolinguistic characteristics of the speaker. We consider the constructions with to čto without the correlate (dumaju to čto) and with the correlate (dovolen tem to čto) separately.

We show that the non-normative to čto is used in all the basic semantic types of complements – propositions, events and irrealis complements. The use of the construction in question is not restricted by the argument structure of the complement-taking predicate or preposition. The data of the corpus show that native speakers using to čto with predicates taking nominative / accusative complements also use it in indirect object positions (note that the component to does not take the indirect case marking). The construction with the correlate is case-assigned by the complement-taking predicate (dovolen tem to čto) and it is only used by native speakers that largely use to čto as a complementizer (frequent users of to čto). The complement clause with to čto is usually postposed to the matrix clause, like the complement clause with čto. In general, the non-normative to čto occurs in the same complement clauses as the normative čto. However, there are contexts where the former is possible, unlike the latter: complement clauses with causative emotive predicates with animate stimuli; with predicates only allowing the standard to, čto and others.

Keywords

complement clause, complementation, conjunctions, language norm, Russian, sentential arguments, spoken discourse, subordination, syntax

Acknowledgment

The study is supported by the RSF grant No. 16-18-02003 (Moscow Pedagogical State University)

Received

10.10.2019

Publication date

10.10.2019

Number of characters

80844

Cite

GOST	Serdobolskaya N., Egorova A. Morphosyntax of Non-Standard Constructions with To Čto in Colloquial Russian // Voprosy Jazykoznanija – 2019. – Issue 5 C. 41-72 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/vopjaz/s0373658x0006285-2-1-en (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0006285-2
MLA	Serdobolskaya, Natalia, Egorova, Anastasiya "Morphosyntax of Non-Standard Constructions with To Čto in Colloquial Russian." Voprosy Jazykoznanija 5 (2019):41-72. DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0006285-2
APA	Serdobolskaya N., Egorova A. (2019). Morphosyntax of Non-Standard Constructions with To Čto in Colloquial Russian. Voprosy Jazykoznanija (5), pp.41-72 DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0006285-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1491

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Apresyan, Pekelis 2011 — Apresyan V. Yu., Pekelis O. E. Soyuz. Materialy dlya proekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoj grammatiki. Na pravakh rukopisi. M., 2011. [Apresjan V. Yu., Pekelis O. E. Conjunction. Materialy dlya proekta korpusnogo opisaniya russkoi grammatiki. As a manuscript. Moscow, 2011.] URL: http://rusgram.ru/Soyuz

2. Arutyunova 1988 — Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znachenij: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt. M.: Nauka, 1988. [Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znachenii: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of linguistic meanings. Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988.]

3. Bogdanova-Beglaryan 2015 — Bogdanova-Beglaryan N. V. Agressivnyj uzus — ili ehvolyutsiya yazykovoj normy? Verkhnevolzhskij filologicheskij sbornik, 2015, 1: 25–30. [Bogdanova-Belgaryan N. V. Aggressive usage — or evolution of language standards? Verkhnevolzhskii fi lologicheskii sbornik, 2015, 1: 25–30.]

4. Valgina 2003 — Valgina N. S. Sovremennyj russkij yazyk: Sintaksis. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2003. [Valgina N. S. Sovremennyi russkii yazyk: Sintaksis [The Modern Russian language: Syntax]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 2003.]

5. Grishina 2005 — Grishina E. A. Ustnaya rech' v Natsional'nom korpuse russkogo yazyka. Natsional'nyj korpus russkogo yazyka: 2003–2005. M.: Indrik, 2005, 94–110. [Grishina E. A. Spoken language in Russian National Corpus. Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka: 2003–2005. Moscow: Indrik, 2005, 94–110.]

6. Dobrushina 2016 — Dobrushina N. R. Soslagatel'noe naklonenie v russkom yazyke. Opyt issledovaniya grammaticheskoj semantiki. Praga: Animedia Company, 2016. [Dobrushina N. R. Soslagatel’noe naklonenie v russkom yazyke. Opyt issledovaniya grammaticheskoi semantiki [Subjunctive mood in Russian. An attempt of grammatical semantics study]. Prague: Animedia Company, 2016.]

7. Dymarskij 2008 — Dymarskij M. Ya. Funktsionirovanie sootnositel'nykh slov v iz'yasnitel'nykh konstruktsiyakh. Slozhnopodchinennoe predlozhenie v leksikograficheskom aspekte: Kollektivnaya monografiya. SPb.: RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2008, 84–117. [Dymarskii M. Ya. Fuctioning of correlatives in constructions with complement clauses. Slozhnopodchinennoe predlozhenie v leksikografi cheskom aspekte: Kollektivnaya monografi ya. St. Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical Univ. of Russia, 2008, 84–117.]

8. Egorova 2018 — Egorova A. D. Funktsionirovanie novogo komplementajzera to chto v russkoj spontannoj rechi. Diplomnaya rabota. M.: MGU, 2018. [Egorova A. D. Funktsionirovanie novogo komplementaizera to chto v russkoi spontannoi rechi [Functioning of new complementizer to čto in spontaneous Russian speech]. MA thesis. Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2018.]

9. Zaliznyak 1990 — Zaliznyak Anna A. O ponyatii «fakt» v lingvisticheskoj semantike. Logicheskij analiz yazyka. Protivorechivost' i anomal'nost' teksta. Arutyunova N. D. (red). M.: Nauka, 1990, 21–33. [Zaliznyak Anna A. On the concept of fact in linguistic semantics. Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Protivorechivost’ i anomal’nost’ teksta. Arutyunova N. D. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1990, 21–33.]

10. Zaliznyak, Mikaehlyan 1988 — Zaliznyak Anna A., Mikaehlyan I. L. Ob odnom sposobe razresheniya neodnoznachnosti v glagolakh propozitsional'noj ustanovki. Semioticheskie aspekty formalizatsii intellektual'noj deyatel'nosti. Shkola-seminar «Borzhomi-88». Tezisy dokladov. M.: VINITI, 1988, 303–306. [Zaliznyak Anna A., Mikaelyan I. L. A means of disambiguation in the verbs of propositional attitude. Semioticheskie aspekty formalizatsii intellektual’noi deyatel’nosti. Shkola-seminar «Borzhomi-88». Tezisy dokladov. Moscow: Russian Institute for Scientifi c and Technical Information, 1988, 303–306.]

11. Zemskaya 1987 — Zemskaya E. A. Russkaya razgovornaya rech': lingvisticheskij analiz i problemy obucheniya. M.: Russkij yazyk, 1987. [Zemskaya E. A. Russkaya razgovornaya rech’: lingvisticheskii analiz i problemy obucheniya [Colloquial Russian: Linguistic analysis and learning problems]. Moscow: Russkii Yazyk, 1987.]

12. Zemskaya i dr. 1981 — Zemskaya E. A., Kitajgorodskaya M. V., Shiryaev E. N. Russkaya razgovornaya rech'. Obschie voprosy. Slovoobrazovanie. Sintaksis. M.: Nauka, 1981. [Zemskaya E. A., Kitaigorodskaya M. V., Shiryaev E. N. Russkaya razgovornaya rech’. Obshchie voprosy. Slovoobrazovanie. Sintaksis [Colloquial Russian. General problems. Word formation. Syntax]. Moscow: Nauka, 1981.]

13. Il'enko 2009 — Il'enko S. G. Kommunikativno-strukturnyj sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. SPb.: RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena, 2009. [Il’enko S. G. Kommunikativno-strukturnyi sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Communicative-structural syntax of Modern Russian]. St. Petersburg: Herzen State Pedagogical Univ. of Russia, 2009.]

14. Karaulov, Krasil'nikova 1989 — Karaulov Yu. N., Krasil'nikova E. V. Russkaya yazykovaya lichnost' i zadachi ee izucheniya. Yazyk i lichnost'. Shmelev D. N. (otv. red.). M.: Nauka, 1989, 3–10. [Karaulov Yu. N., Krasil’nikova E. V. The Russian linguistic personality and the objects of its study. Yazyk i lichnost’. Shmelev D. N. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1989, 3–10.]

15. Kibrik 2010 — Kibrik A. A. Mul'timodal'naya lingvistika. Kognitivnye issledovaniya. Vyp. 4. M.: In-t psikhologii RAN, 2010, 134–152. [Kibrik A. A. Multimodal linguistics. Kognitivnye issledovaniya. No. 4. Moscow: Institute for Psychology of RAS, 2010, 134–152.]

16. Kibrik, Podlesskaya 2009 — Kibrik A. A., Podlesskaya V. I. (red.). Rasskazy o snovideniyakh: korpusnoe issledovanie ustnogo russkogo diskursa. M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur, 2009, 288–308. [Kibrik A. A., Podlesskaya V. I. (eds.). Rasskazy o snovideniyakh: korpusnoe issledovanie ustnogo russkogo diskursa [Night Dream Stories: A corpus study of spoken Russian discourse]. Moscow: Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul’tur, 2009, 288–308].

17. Kitajgorodskaya, Rozanova 1995 — Kitajgorodskaya M. V., Rozanova N. N. Russkij rechevoj portret. Fonokhrestomatiya. M.: Nauka: 1995. [Kitaigorodskaya M. V., Rozanova N. N. Russkij rechevoj portret. Fonokhrestomatiya [The Russian speech portrait. A phonetic reading book]. Moscow: Nauka, 1995.]

18. Klimov 2004 — Klimov E. A. Psikhologiya professional'nogo samoopredeleniya. Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenij. M.: Akademiya, 2004. [Klimov E. A. Psikhologiya professional’nogo samoopredeleniya [Psychology of profession choice]. A tutorial for pedagogical higher school students. Moscow: Academia, 2004.]

19. Knyazev 2018 — Knyazev M. Yu. Ob ogranichenii na sententsial'nyj aktant s soyuzom chto pri deagentivnykh upotrebleniyakh glagolov rechi. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2018, 3: 7–39. [Knyazev M. Yu. On the restriction on complement clauses with the complementizer čto with non-agentive uses of speech act verbs in Russian. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2018, 3: 7–39.]

20. Knyazev 2019 — Knyazev M. Yu. Ehksperimental'noe issledovanie distributsii iz'yasnitel'nogo soyuza to chto v nestandartnykh variantakh russkogo yazyka. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2019, 5: 7–40 [Knyazev M. Yu. An experimental study of the distribution of the complementizer to čto in non-standard variants of Russian. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 2019, 5: 7–40.]

21. Kobozeva 2013 — Kobozeva I. M. Usloviya upotrebleniya «to» pered pridatochnym iz'yasnitel'nym s soyuzom «chto». Du mot au texte. Études slavo-romanes. Inkova O. (éd.). Bern: Peter Lang, 2013, 129–148. [Kobozeva I. M. Conditions of use of to before the complement clause with conjunction chto. Du mot au texte. Études slavo-romanes. Inkova O. (éd.). Bern: Peter Lang, 2013, 129–148.]

22. Kobozeva 2018 — Kobozeva I. M. ChTO i KAK v sostave mnogokomponentnykh soyuzov v svete protivopostavleniya «fakt» ― «sobytie». Doklad na konferentsii «Logicheskij analiz yazyka. Chteniya pamyati N. D. Arutyunovoj», Moskva, 2018. [Kobozeva I. M. ČTO and KAK within complex conjunctions in the light of the fact vs. event opposition. Talk at the conference “Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Chteniya pamyati N. D. Arutyunovoi”, Moscow, 2018.] URL: https://istina.msu.ru/conferences/presentations/112550245

23. Kozhemyakina 2016 — Kozhemyakina (Egorova) A. D. Konstruktsii s «to chto» v ustnoj spontannoj rechi. Problemy yazyka: Sbornik nauchnykh statej po materialam Chetvertoj konferentsii-shkoly «Problemy yazyka: vzglyad molodykh uchenykh». M.: Kantsler, 2016. [Kozhemyakina (Egorova) A. D. Constructions with to čto in spontaneous Russian speech. Problemy yazyka: Sbornik nauchnykh statei po materialam Chetvertoi konferentsii-shkoly «Problemy yazyka: vzglyad molodykh uchenykh». Moscow: Kantsler, 2016.]

24. Korotaev 2013 — Korotaev N. A. Polipredikativnye konstruktsii s to chto v nepublichnoj ustnoj rechi. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii: po materialam mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii «Dialog 2013». Vyp. 12(19). M.: Izd-vo RGGU, 2013, 324–331. [Korotaev N. A. Polypredicative constructions with to čto in non-public spoken Russian. Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii: Po materialam ezhegodnoi Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii «Dialog», Issue 12(19). Moscow: Russian State Univ. for the Humanities Publ., 2013, 324–331.]

25. Korotaev 2016 — Korotaev N. A. Soyuz to chto v ustnoj russkoj rechi. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanij, 2016, t. XII, ch. 1: 101–106. [Korotaev N. A. The conjunction to čto in spoken Russian. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanii, 2016, vol. XII, part 1: 101–106.]

26. Krasnykh 1971 — Krasnykh V. I. Ob upotreblenii korrelyatov v iz'yasnitel'nykh slozhnopodchinennykh predlozheniyakh. Russkij yazyk v natsional'noj shkole, 1971, 3: 75–81. [Krasnykh V. I. Usage of correlatives in sentences with complement clauses. Russkii yazyk v natsional’noi shkole, 1971, 3: 75–81.]

27. Lapteva 1976 — Lapteva O. A. Russkij razgovornyj sintaksis. M.: Nauka, 1976. [Lapteva O. A. Russkii razgovornyi sintaksis [Syntax of Colloquial Russian]. Moscow: Nauka, 1976.]

28. Maksimov 2011 — Maksimov L. Yu. Mnogomernaya klassifikatsiya slozhnopodchinennykh predlozhenij (na materiale sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka). Stavropol'; Pyatigorsk: Izd-vo StavGU, 2011. [Maksimov L. Yu. Mnogomernaya klassifi katsiya slozhnopodchinennykh predlozhenii (na materiale sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka) [A multidimensional classifi cation of hypotactic sentences: A case study of Modern Standard Russian]. Stavropol; Pyatigorsk: Stavropol State Univ. Publ., 2011.]

29. Nikolaeva 1991 — Nikolaeva T. M. «Sotsiolingvisticheskij portret» i metody ego opisaniya. Russkij yazyk i sovremennost'. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya rusistiki. Doklady vsesoyuznoj nauchnoj konferentsii. M., 1991, 20–23. [Nikolaeva T. M. “Sociolinguistic portrait” and methods of its description. Russkii yazyk i sovremennost’. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya rusistiki. Doklady vsesoyuznoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Moscow, 1991, 20–23].

30. NKRYa — Natsional'nyj korpus russkogo yazyka. [Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus].] URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru

31. RG-1980 — Shvedova N. Yu. (gl. red.). Russkaya grammatika. T. I. M.: Nauka, 1980. [Shvedova N. Yu. (ed.). Russkaya grammatika [The Russian grammar]. Vol. I. Moscow: Nauka, 1980.]

32. Kholodilova 2016 — Kholodilova M. A. (To,) chto nazyvaetsya: mezhdu otnositel'noj konstruktsiej i ustojchivym vvodnym oborotom. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanij, 2016, t. XII, ch. 3: 763–780. [Kholodilova M. A. (To,) čto nazyvaetsja: Between a relative construction and an idiomatic parenthetical phrase. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanii, 2016, vol. XII, part 3: 763–780.]

33. Cheremisina 2015 — Cheremisina M. I. Ob iz'yasnitel'noj konstruktsii s fakul'tativnym upravlyaemym mestoimeniem to. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gos. un-ta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya, 2015, 14(9): 11–24. [Cheremisina M. I. On complement clause constructions with the pronoun to. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, fi lologiya, 2015, 14(9): 11–24.]

34. Asher 1993 — Asher N. Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ., 1993.

35. Dik 1997 — Dik S. C. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2: Complex and derived constructions. Hengeveld K. (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997.

36. Evans, Watanabe 2016 — Evans N., Watanabe H. The dynamics of insubordination. An overview. Insubordination. Evans N., Watanabe H. (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016, 1–38.

37. Kobozeva 2000 — Kobozeva I. The problem of identifi cation and syntactic representation of Russian complex sentences with illocutionary-independent subordinate clauses. 3. Europäische Konferenz “Formale Beschreibung Slavischer Sprachen”. (Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, 75.) Zybatow G., Junghanns U., Mehlhorn G., Szucsich L. (eds.). Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik der Universität Leipzig, 2000, 67–79.

38. Mann, Thompson 1988 — Mann W. C., Thompson S. A. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 1988, 8(3): 243–281.

39. Palmer 2001 — Palmer F. R. Mood and modality. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001.

40. Peterson 1997 — Peterson P. L. Fact, Proposition, Event. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ., 1997.

41. Mauri, Sansò 2016 — Mauri C., Sansò A. The linguistic marking of (ir)realis and subjunctive. The Oxford handbook of mood and modality. Nuyts J., van der Auwera J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2016, 166–195.