Все
 
 
 


Studia Dionea novissima: Historical Narrative, Interpretations of the Past and Political Contexts of Cassius Dio’s “Roman History”. Part II.
 
Название публикации (др.)Studia Dionea Novissima: Исторический нарратив, интерпретации прошлого и политические контексты «Римской истории» Кассия Диона (Часть II)
Код статьиS032103910015355-3-1
DOI10.31857/S032103910015355-3
Тип публикации Статья
Статус публикации Опубликовано
Авторы
Марков Константин Владимирович 
Аффилиация: Кафедра истории Древнего мира и Средних веков ННГУ им. Н.И. Лобачевского
Адрес: Российская Федерация, Нижний Новгород
Махлаюк Александр Валентинович
Аффилиация: Кафедра истории древнего мира и Средних веков ННГУ им. Н.И. Лобачевского
Адрес: Российская Федерация, Нижний Новгород
Название журналаВестник древней истории
ВыпускТом 82 Выпуск 4
Страницы869-898
Аннотация

The article, continuing the overview of current Cassius Dio scholarship, focuses on the debates surrounding issues of narrative modes and patterns of his Roman History, including the role of various speeches in their dramatic context, the correlation between annalistic and biographical techniques, Dio’s treatment of Roman public institutions and especially their evolution within the transition from the Republic to Principate. The discussions concerning Dio’s political and literary career, his political thinking, and the constitutional debate in Book 52 also are under consideration. The present survey demonstrates that modern scholars have completely abandoned the outdated preconception of Dio as a ‘copyist’ or a ‘compiler’. Currently, this historian is treated as an author who had a distinct narrative strategy, elaborated the structure of his work and made deliberate choices between historiographic methods and techniques. Recent studies show, on the one hand, the diversity of methodological agendas applied to different parts of Dio’s work, and on the other hand, a number of recurrent themes and issues. The majority of these elements of consistency belong to the sphere of the author’s political agenda, with the entire conceptual framework of Dio’s narrative being closely connected to the demonstration of paradigms of proper political leadership.

Аннотация (др.)

В статье, продолжающей обзор современных исследований Кассия Диона, основное внимание уделяется спорным вопросам о повествовательных модусах и моделях его «Римской истории», в том числе рассматриваются роль различных речей в их историческом контексте, корреляция между анналистическим и биографическим нарративами, трактовка Дионом государственных институтов и, прежде всего, их эволюции в период перехода от Республики к Принципату. Анализируются также мнения современных исследователей, касающиеся политической и литературной карьеры Диона, его политических воззрений, дискуcсии о наилучшей форме правления в книге LII. Настоящий обзор показывает, что современные исследователи полностью отказались от устаревшего представления о Дионе как о «плагиаторе» или «компиляторе». В настоящее время Дион оценивается как автор, у которого была четкая повествовательная стратегия, детально проработанная структура нарратива и осознанный выбор историографических методов и литературной техники. Недавние исследования обнаруживают, с одной стороны, разнообразие подходов историка, применяемых к различным частям его труда, а с другой – ряд повторяющихся тем и вопросов. Большинство этих связующих элементов относится к сфере политических установок автора, и вся концептуальная основа дионовского повествования тесно связана с репрезентацией парадигм политического лидерства.

Ключевые словаCassius Dio, Graeco-Roman historiography, historical causation, historical narrative, historiographic methods and techniques, political agenda, Cassius Dio scholarship
Ключевые слова (др.)Кассий Дион, греко-римская историография, историческая причинность, истори-ческий нарратив, методология историографии, современная историография
Источник финансированияИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 20-19-50173.
Получено06.06.2021
Дата публикации23.12.2022
Кол-во символов74572
Цитировать  
100 руб.
При оформлении подписки на статью или выпуск пользователь получает возможность скачать PDF, оценить публикацию и связаться с автором. Для оформления подписки требуется авторизация.

Оператором распространения коммерческих препринтов является ООО «Интеграция: ОН»

Всего подписок: 0, всего просмотров: 546

Оценка читателей: голосов 0 

1. Aalders, G.J.D. 1986: Cassius Dio and the Greek world. Mnemosyne 39/3–4, 282–304.
2. Adler, E. 2008: Boudicca’s speeches in Tacitus and Dio. Classical World 101/2, 173–195.
3. Adler, E. 2012: Cassius Dio’s Agrippa-Maecenas debate: an operational code analysis. American Journal of Philology 133/3, 477–520.
4. Ameling, W. 1997: Griechische Intellektuelle und das Imperium Romanum: Das Beispiel Cassius Dio. In: W. Haase (Hrsg.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.34/3, 2472–2496.
5. André, J.M. 1967: Mécène essai de biographie spirituelle, Paris.
6. Asirvatham, S.R. 2020: Cassius Dio, Ὁμόνοια, and civil war. In: С. Lange, А. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 289–312.
7. Avallone, R. 1962: Mecenate. Naples.
8. Barnes, T.D. 1984: The composition of Cassius Dio’s ‘Roman History’. Phoenix 38/3, 240–255.
9. Baron, C. 2019: Wrinkles in time: chronological puptures in Cassius Dio’s narrative of the late Republic. In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden–Boston, 50–71.
10. Bellissime, M. 2016: Polysémie, contextualization, resémantisation: à propos de μοναρχία et de δημοκρατία. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 529–544.
11. Bertrand, E. 2015: Cassius Dion et les cycles de l’histoire: du topos littéraire à la réflexion historique. In: E. Bertrand, R. Campatangelo-Soussignan (eds.), Cycles de la Nature, Cycles de l’Histoire. De la découverte des météores à la fin de l’âge d’or. (Scripta Antiqua, 76). Bordeaux, 163–172.
12. Bertrand, E. 2020: Cassius Dio and the Roman Empire: the impact of the Severan wars on Dio’s narrative. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 120–137.
13. Bertrand, E., Coudry, M. 2016: De Pompée à Auguste: les mutations de l’imperium militiae. 2. Un traitement particulier dans l’Histoire romaine de Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion : nouvelles lectures. 2 volumes. Bordeaux, 595–608.
14. Bertrand, E., Coudry, M., Fromentin, V. 2016: Temporalité historique et formes du récit. Le modalités de l’écriture dans les livres tardo-républicains. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion : nouvelles lectures. 2 volumes. Bordeaux, 303–316.
15. Bono, M. 2019: Riflessioni sulla lacuna nel dibattito Agrippa–Mecenate (Dio 52.13.7–14.1). Athenaeum 107/2, 479–502.
16. Bono, M. 2020: Teoria politica e scrittura storiografica nei ‘libri imperiali’ della Storia Romana di Cassio Dione. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venezia, 39–66.
17. Briquel, D. 2016: Origines et période royale. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 125–142.
18. Burden-Strevens, C. 2015a: Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic.PhD thesis. Glasgow.
19. Burden-Strevens, C. 2015b: Ein völlig romanisierter Mann? Identity, identification, and integration in the ‘Roman History’ of Cassius Dio and in Arrian. In: S. Roselaar (ed.), Processes of Cultural Change and Integration in the Roman World. Leiden–Boston, 287–306.
20. Burden-Strevens, C. 2016a: Review-discussion. Historical knowledge and historiographical narratives in the Severan period (review of Kemezis A., Greek narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian, 2014). Histos 10, 9–18.
21. Burden-Strevens, C. 2016b: Fictitious speeches, envy, and the habituation to authority: writing the collapse of the Roman Republic. In: J.M. Lange, C.H. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 193–216.
22. Burden-Strevens, C. 2018: Reconstructing Republican oratory in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. In: C. Gray (ed.), Reading Republican Oratory: Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions. Oxford, 111–134.
23. Burden-Strevens, C. 2019: The Republican dictatorship: an Imperial perspective. In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden–Boston, 36–49.
24. Burden-Strevens, C. 2020: Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic: The Roman History, Books 3–56. Leiden–Boston.
25. Burden-Strevens, C. 2022: The Agrippa-Maecenas Debate. In: A. Scott, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Cassius Dio. Leiden–Boston, forthcoming.
26. Burden-Strevens, C., Lindholmer, M. (eds.) 2019: Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston.
27. Burden-Strevens, C., Madsen, J.M., Pistellato, A. 2020: Introduction. In: С. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 7–17.
28. Carsana, C. 1990: La teoria della “constituzione mista” nell’età imperiale romana. Como.
29. Carsana, C. 2016: La teoria delle forme di governo: il punto di vista di Cassio Dione sui poteri di Cesare. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 545–558.
30. Coltelloni-Trannoy, M 2016a: Les temporalités du recít impérial dans l’Histoire romaine de Cassius Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 335–362.
31. Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. 2016b: La πολιτεία imperial d’après Cassius Dion (livres 52–59). In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 559–566.
32. Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. 2016c: Les procédures sénatoriales à l’époque impériale: les choix de l’historien. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 625–652.
33. Coudry, M. 2016a: Figures et récit dans les livres républicains (livres 36 à 44). In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lec-tures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 287–301.
34. Coudry, M. 2016b: Institutions et procédures politiques de la République romaine: les choix lexicaux de Cassius Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 485–518.
35. Coudry, M. 2016c: Sénat et magistrats à la vielle de la guerre civile. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lec-tures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 519–528.
36. Coudry, M. 2019a: The ‘Great Men’ of the middle Republic in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. In: C. Burden-Strevens, M. Lindholmer (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 126–164.
37. Coudry, M. 2019b: Electoral bribery and the challenge to the authority of the senate: two aspects of Dio’s view of the late Roman Republic (Books 36–40). In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden–Boston, 36–49.
38. Cresci Marrone, G. 2016: La politica al bivio. Il dibattito Agrippa-Mecenate in Cassio Dione. In: G. Negri, A. Valvo (eds.), Studi su Augusto: in occasione del XX centenario della morte. Turin, 55–76.
39. Dalla Rosa, A. 2019: Augusto δημοκρατικός: il commentarius ex quo lex Papia Poppaea lata est, Cassio Dione e la politica augustea del consenso. In: A. Heller, C. Müller, A. Suspène (eds.), Philorômaios kai philhellén. Hommages à Jean-Louis Ferrary. Genève, 153–171.
40. Davenport, C., Mallan, C. 2014: Hadrian’s adoption speech in Cassius Dio’s Roman History and the problems of imperial succession. American Journal of Philology 135/4, 637–668.
41. De Blois, L. 1998–1999: The perception of emperor and empire in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Ancient Society 29, 267–281.
42. Devillers, O. 2016a: Cassius Dion et les sources prétacitéennes. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 233–242.
43. Devillers, O. 2016b: Cassius Dion et l’évolution de l’annalistique. Remarques à propos de le representation des Julio-Claudiens dans l’Histoire romaine. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 317–334.
44. Eisman, M.M. 1977: Dio and Josephus: parallel analyses. Latomus 36/3, 657–673.
45. Escribano, M.V. 1999: Estrategias retoricas y pensamiento politico en la Historia Romana de Cassio Dion. L'Antiquité Classique 68, 171–190.
46. Espinosa Ruiz, U. 1982: Debate Agrippa-Mecenas en Dion Casio. Respuesta senatorial a la crisis del imperio romano en epoca Severiana. Madrid.
47. Espinosa Ruiz, U. 1987: El problema de la historicidad en le debate Agrippa-Mecenas de Dion Casio. Gerion 5, 289–316.
48. Favuzzi, A. 1990: Retorica e storia in Cassio Dione LII.17/3–4. Annali dell’Univ. degli studi di Bari 33, 147–158.
49. Fomin, A. 2015: How Dio Wrote History: Dio Cassius’ Intellectual, Historical, and Literary Techniques. PhD thesis. New Brunswick.
50. Fomin, A. 2016: Speeches in Dio Cassius. In: J.M. Lange, C.H. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 217–237.
51. France, J. 2016: Financer l’empire: Agrippa, Mécène et Cassius Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 773–786.
52. Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. 1997: Aspects du vocabulaire politique et institutionnel de Dion Cassius. Paris.
53. Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. 2013: Dion Cassius, un Gréco-romain du IIe siècle. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 9, 77–90.
54. Fromentin, V. 2016: Denys d’Halicarnasse, source et modèle de Cassius Dion? In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lec-tures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 179–190.
55. Fromentin, V. 2021: Cassius Dio scholarship in the 20th & 21st centuries. In: J. Madsen, C. Lange, Cassius Dio the Historian. Methods and Approaches. Leiden–Boston, 23–59.
56. Gabba, E. 1955: Sulla Storia Romana di Cassio Dione. Rivista Storica Italiana 67, 289–333.
57. Garnsey, A. 1967: Adultery trials and the survival of the quaestiones in the Severan age. Journal of Roman Studies 57/1–2, 56–60.
58. Gowing, A 1992: The Triumviral Narratives of Appian and Cassius Dio. Ann Arbor.
59. Gowing, A.M. 1998: Greek advice for a Roman senator: Cassius Dio and the dialogue between Philiscus and Cicero (38.18–29). Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 10, 373–390.
60. Hammond, M. 1932: The significance of the speech of Maecenas in Dio Cassius, book LII. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 63, 88–102.
61. Havener, W. 2020: “A Warlike Man”: Cassius Dio’s perception and interpretation of the Imperial military persona. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 138–162.
62. Hidber, T. 2004: Cassius Dio. In: I. de Jong, R. Nünlist, A.M. Bowie (eds.) Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Vol. 1. Leiden–Boston, 187–199.
63. Hose, M. 1994: Erneuerung der Vergangenheit. Die Historiker im Imperium Romanum von Florus bis Cassius Dio. Stuttgart–Leipzig.
64. Hose, M. 2007: Cassius Dio: a senator and historian in the age of anxiety. In: J. Marincola (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Chichester, 461–467.
65. Horst, C. 2010: Zur politischen Funktion des Demokratiebegriffes in der Kaiserzeit: eine Interpretation der Reden des Agrippa und Maecenas (Cassius Dio 52, 1–41). In: T. Schmitt, V.V. Dement’eva (eds.), Volk und Demokratie im Altertum. Gottingen, 189–208.
66. Imrie, A. 2020: The war comes home: Rome and Romans during civil conflict in the Roman History. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 165–191.
67. Jones, B. 2016: Cassius Dio: Pepaideumenos and politician on kingship. In: J.M. Lange, C.H. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 297–315.
68. Kemezis, A.M. 2006: The Roman Past in the Age of the Severans. PhD thesis. Michigan.
69. Kemezis, A.M. 2014: Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian. Cambridge–New York.
70. Kemezis, A. 2016: Dio, Caesar and the Vesontio mutineers (38.34–47): a rhetoric of lies. In: J.M. Lange, C.H. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 238–257.
71. Kuhlmann, P. 2010: Die Maecenas-Rede bei Cassius Dio: Anachronismen und intertextuelle Bezuge. In: D. Pausch (ed.), Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Berlin, 109–123.
72. Kuhn-Chen, B. 2002: Geschichtskonzeptionen griechischer Historiker im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert n.Chr. Untersuchungen zu den Werken von Appian, Cassius Dio und Herodian. Frankfurt am Main.
73. Lachenaud, G. 2016: Récit et discours chez Cassius Dion: frontières, interférences et polyphonie. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 397–415.
74. Lange, C.H. 2019: Cassius Dio on violence, stasis, and civil war: the early years. In: C. Burden-Strevens, M. Lindholmer (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 165–189.
75. Lange, C.H. 2020: Talking heads: the Rostra as a conspicuous civil war monument. In: C.H. Lange, A.G. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Boston–Leiden, 192–218.
76. Lange, C.H., Scott, A.G. (eds.) 2020: Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Boston–Leiden.
77. Letta, C. 1979: La composizione dell’opera di Cassio Dione: cronologia e sfondo storico-politico. In: L. Troiani et al. Ricerche di storiografia greca di eta romana. Pisa, 117–189.
78. Letta, C. 2019: La carriera politica di Cassio Dione e la genesi della sua Storia Romana. Studi classici e orientali 65/2, 163–180.
79. Lindholmer, M.O. 2018a: Cassius Dio and the age of δυναστεία. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 58, 561–590.
80. Lindholmer, M.O. 2018b: Reading diachronically: a new reading of book 36 of Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Histos 12, 139–168.
81. Lindholmer, M.O. 2019a: Breaking the idealistic paradigm: competition in Dio’s earlier Republic. In: C. Burden-Strevens, M. Lindholmer, (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 190–216.
82. Lindholmer, M.O. 2019b: The fall of Cassius Dio’s Roman Republic. Klio 101/2, 473–504.
83. Lindholmer, M.O. 2020: Cassius Dio’s ideal government and the Imperial senate. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 67–94.
84. Lindholmer, M.O. 2021: The time of composition of Cassius Dio’s Roman History: a reconsideration. Klio 103/1, 133–159.
85. Lintott, A.W. 1997: Cassius Dio and the history of the late Roman Republic. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.34/3, 2497–2523.
86. Madsen, J.M. 2016: Criticising the benefactors: the Severans and the return of dynastic rule. In: C.H. Lange, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 136–159.
87. Madsen, J.M. 2019: Like father like son: the differences in how Dio tells the story of Julius Caesar and his more successful son. In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden–Boston, 259–282.
88. Madsen J.M. 2020: Reconstructing the Principate: Dio and the Flavians. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 95–114.
89. Mallan, C. 2014: The rape of Lucretia in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. Classical Quarterly 64/2, 758–771.
90. Mallan, C. 2016: Parrhesia in Cassius Dio. In: C.H. Lange, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 258–275.
91. Markov, K.V. 2008: [Towards the chronology of Cassius Dio’s Roman History]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 2, 142–154.
92. Марков, К.В. К вопросу о хронологии работы Диона Кассия над «Римской историей». ВДИ 2, 142–154.
93. Markov, K.V. 2013: The cconcepts of ‘democracy’ and ‘tyranny’ in the speech of Agrippa in Cassius Dio 52.1–13: conventional rhetoric or political theory? In: A. Mehl, A.V. Makhlayuk, O.L. Gabelko (eds.), Ruthenia classica aetatis novae: A Collection of Works by Russian Scholars in Greek and Roman History. Stuttgart, 215–231.
94. Markov, K.V. 2016: Towards the peculiarities of Cassius Dio’s public career in 220s. Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod 3, 57–62.
95. Markov, K.V. 2019: Towards the conceptualization of Cassius Dio’s narration of the early career of Octavian. In: J. Osgood, C. Baron (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden–Boston, 282–298.
96. Markov, K.V. 2020: Cassius Dio on senatorial activities as a factor of political instability and civil war. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 241–256.
97. Markov, K.V. 2021: Cassius Dio’s periodization of Roman history and his methodological agendas. In: J. Madsen, C. Lange (eds.), Cassius Dio the Historian. Methods and Approaches. Leiden–Boston, 109–129.
98. Mastrorosa, I.G. 2014: Octavien à la veille d’Actium chez Dion Cassius (L.24–30): Haranguer les troupes en diffamant l’adversaire. Exercises de rhétorique 3, 1–13.
99. Mastrorosa, I.G. 2017: Oratory and political debate in the last decades of the Roman Republic: Cassius Dio’s reconstruction (with some notes from Remigio Nannini’s Orationi Militari). In: J.C. Iglesias-Zoido, V. Pineda (eds.), Anthologies of Historiographical Speeches from Antiquity to Early Modern Times. Rearranging the Tesserae. Leiden–Boston, 319–338.
100. Meyer, P. 1891. De Maecenatis oratione a Dione ficta. Diss. Berlin.
101. Millar, F. 1964: A Study of Cassius Dio. Oxford.
102. Millar, F. 2005: Rome in Greek culture: Cassius Dio and Ulpian. In: L. Troiani, G. Zecchini (eds.), La cultura storica nei primi due secoli dell’impero romano (Milano, 3–5 giugno 2004). Roma, 17–40.
103. Molin, M. 2016a: Cassius Dion et les empereurs de son temps. Pour une confrontation du manuscrit Vaticanus Graecus 1288 et des autres sources contemporaines. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lec-tures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 259–270.
104. Molin, M. 2016b: Biographie de l’historien Cassius Dion. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lec-tures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 431–446.
105. Molin, M. 2016c: Cassius Dion et la société de son temps. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lec-tures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 469–482.
106. Murison, C.L. 1999: Rebellion and Reconstruction: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 64–67 (A.D. 68–96). Oxford.
107. Noe, C.V. 2020: The ‘Age of Iron and Rust’ in Cassius Dio’s Roman History: influences from stoic philosophy. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 141–164.
108. Osgood, J. 2020: “If you do wrong, you will be king!”: the civil war victor in Cassius Dio. In: C. Lange, A. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 313–389.
109. Pelling, C.B.R. 1997: Biographical history? Cassius Dio on the early Principate. In: M.J. Edwards, S. Swain (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire. Oxford, 117–144.
110. Pistellato, A. 2020: Δημοκρατεῖσθαι or μοναρχεῖσθαι, that is the question: Cassius Dio and the senatorial principate. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 115–140.
111. Platon, M. 2016: Sénat et pouvoir impérial dans les livres 57 et 58 de l’Histoire romaine de Cassius Dion Rome et son empire. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 653–678.
112. Questa, C. 1957: Tecnica biographica e tecnica annalistica nei libri LIII–LXIII di Cassio Dione. Studi Urbinati di Storia 31, 37–53.
113. Rantala, J. 2016: Dio the dissident: the portrait of Severus in the Roman History. In: C.H. Lange, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 159–176.
114. Rees, W. 2011: Cassius Dio, Human Nature, and the Late Roman Republic. PhD thesis. Oxford.
115. Reinhold, M. 1988: From Republic to Principate: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History, Books 49–52 (36–29 BC). Atlanta.
116. Rich, J. W. 1989: Dio on Augustus. In: A. Cameron (ed.), History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History. London, 86–110.
117. Rich, J.W. 1990: Cassius Dio, The Augustan Settlement (Roman History 53–55.9). Warminster.
118. Rich, J.W. 2016: Annalistic organization and book division in Dio’s Books 1–35. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lec-tures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 271–286.
119. Rich, J.W. 2019: Speech in Cassius Dio’s Roman History, books 1–35. In: C. Burden-Strevens, M. Lindholmer, (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 217–284.
120. Rich, J.W. 2020: Appian, Cassius Dio and Seneca the Elder. In: M.C. Scappaticcio (ed.), Seneca the Elder and his Rediscovered ‘Historiae ab initio bellorum civilium’: New Perspectives on Early-Imperial Roman Historiography. Berlin–Boston, 329–354.
121. Rodrigues, N.S. 2021: El agôn constitucial en Dion Casio 52: Récorrido de un tópico historiográfico en la biografía de Augusto. In: O. Devillers, B.B. Sebastiani (eds.), Sources et modèles des historiens anciens. Bordeaux, 357–366.
122. Schettino, M.T. 2001: Cassio Dione e le guerre civili di età severiana. Gerion 19, 533–558.
123. Schmidt, M.G. 1997: Die ‘zeitgeschichtlichen’ Bücher im Werke des Cassius Dio: Von Commodus zu Severus Alexander. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.34/3, 2591–2649.
124. Schulz, V. 2016: Historiography and panegyric: the deconstruction of imperial representation in Cassius Dio’s Roman History. In: C.H. Lange, J.M. Madsen (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden–Boston, 276–296.
125. Schulz, V. 2019a: Defining the good ruler: early kings as proto-imperial figures in Cassius Dio. In: C. Burden-Strevens, M. Lindholmer (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden–Boston, 311–332.
126. Schulz, V. 2019b: Deconstructing Imperial Representation: Tacitus, Cassius Dio, and Suetonius on Nero and Domitian. Leiden–Boston.
127. Schwartz, Ed. 1899: Cassius Dio. RE. Hlbd. 3, 1684–1722.
128. Scott, A.G. 2015: Cassius Dio, Caracalla, and the senate. Klio 97, 157–175.
129. Scott, A.G. 2020a: Civil war and governmental change: from the achievements of Augustus to the failures of the Severans. In: C.H. Lange, A.G. Scott (eds.), Cassius Dio: The Impact of Violence, War, and Civil War. Leiden–Boston, 334–355.
130. Scott, A.G. 2020b: Misunderstanding history: past and present in Cassius Dio’s contemporary books. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venezia, 165–188.
131. Simon, M. 2016: L’épisode de Sentinum chez Zonaras à la lumière du parallèle livien. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 205–214.
132. Simons, B. 2009: Cassius Dio und die Römische Republik. Untersuchungen zum Bild des römischen Gemeinwesens in den Büchern 3–35 der „Rhomaika“. Berlin–New York.
133. Simons, B. 2012: Cassius Dio und die Katastrophen von 9. n.Chr. und 53 v.Chr. Gymnasium 119/6, 571–596.
134. Smyshlyayev, A.L. 1990: [The speech of Maecenas (Dio Cass. LII, 14–40): problems of interpretation”]. Vestnik drevney istorii [Journal of Ancient History] 1, 54–66.
135. Смышляев, А.Л. «Речь Мецената» (Dio Cass. LII, 14—40): проблемы интерпретации. ВДИ 1, 54–66.
136. Smyshlyaev, A.L. 1991: Maecenas’ speech (Dio Cass. LII.14–40): problems of interpretation. Acta Universitatis Carolinae – Philologica 2 Graecolatina Pragensia 13, 137–155.
137. Swan, P.M. 1997: How Cassius Dio composed his Augustan books: four studies. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.34/3, 2524–2557.
138. Urso, G. 2020: ‘Ritorno alla monarchia’, tra Cesare e Augusto: le origini del principato in Cassio Dione. In: C. Burden-Strevens, J.M. Madsen, A. Pistellato (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Principate. Venice, 19–38.
139. Van Stekelenburg, A.V. 1971: De redevoeringen bij Cassius Dio. PhD thesis. Leiden.
140. Vrind, G. 1923: De Cassii Dionis vocabulis quae ad ius publicum pertinent. PhD thesis. The Hague.
141. Zawadzki, R. 1983: Konzeption der römischen Staatsverfassung in der politischen Doktrin des Cassius Dio. Zur Interpretation des LII. Buches der Römischen Geschichte von Cassius Dio. Analecta Cracoviensia 15, 271–318.
142. Zecchini, G. 2016: Cassius Dion et l’historiographie de son temps. In: V. Fromentin (ed.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. New Studies on Cassius Dio. Bordeaux, 113–124.

Система Orphus

Загрузка...
Вверх