Rome and Christianity: Reinvention of History in Christian Apologetics of the Second and Third Centuries AD

 
PIIS032103910002908-1-1
DOI10.31857/S032103910002908-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameVestnik drevnei istorii
EditionVolume 78 Issue 4
Pages889-908
Abstract

The paper presents a study of rethinking the history of relations between Christianity and Roman Empire by Christian apologists of the 2nd–3rd centuries. Authors of this period tell fictive stories about pro-Christian actions of various Roman emperors. Sometimes we can find positive interpretations of the real acts of Roman authorities or see Roman history organically incorporated into the world’s history (in a Christian context, so the existence of the Roman empire acquires providential and eschatological purpose). Apologetic literature displays more positive attitude towards Roman state than it had been the case in the apostolic age. There was an opportunity and need for constructing a new model of the history of relationship between the State and the Church. The process of “Christianizing history” in the apologetic literature of the 2nd–3rd centuries could be interpreted as a way of creating cultural memory of the Christian community and establishing the group identity within the setting of the Roman world.

Keywordsearly Christianity, apologetics, Roman empire, 2nd–3rd centuries, cultural memory
AcknowledgmentRussian Foundation for Basic Research. Project No. 17-31-01061
Received23.01.2019
Publication date23.01.2019
Number of characters49841
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1966

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ackeren, M. van. 2012: A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Oxford.

2. Afinogenov, D.E. K komu obraschena apologiya Tatiana. VDI 1, 1990. S. 167–174.

3. Afinogenov, D.E. 2000: Tatian i ego «Slovo k ehllinam» v istoricheskom kontekste. V sb.: Rannekhristianskie apologety II–IV vekov: Perevody i issledovaniya. M., 2000. S. 80–92.

4. Assman, Ya. Kul'turnaya pamyat': Pis'mo i pamyat' o proshlom i po-liticheskaya identichnost' v vysokikh kul'turakh drevnosti. (Per. s nemetskogo M.M. Sokol'skoj). M., 2004.

5. Barnard, L.W. 1967: Justin Martyr: His Life and Thought. Cambridge.

6. Barnes, T.D. 1981: Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge (Mass).

7. Becker, E.-M. 2017: The Birth of Christian History: Memory and Time from Mark to Luke-Acts. Yale.

8. Benko, S. 1984: Pagan Rome and the Early Christians. Bloomington (Indiana).

9. Bol'shakov, A.P. «Ehlliny» i «ehllinskaya mudrost'» v proizvedeniyakh rannekhristianskikh apologetov. V sb.: V.I. Kuzischin i dr. (red.), Drevnij Vostok i antichnyj mir: trudy kafedry istorii Drevnego mira istoricheskogo fakul'teta MGU. Vyp. 4. M., 2001. S. 151–165.

10. Bol'shakov, A.P. Greko-iudejskie traditsii v khristianskikh apologiyakh II–IV vekov. Avtoref. diss.… kand. ist. nauk. M., 2002.

11. Bol'shakov, A.P. Rannekhristianskie apologii: proiskhozhdenie i soderzhanie. V sb.: Drevnij Vostok i antichnyj mir: trudy kafedry istorii Drevnego mira istoricheskogo fakul'teta MGU. Vyp. 5. M., 2002. S. 151–165.

12. Bolotov, V.V. Lektsii po istorii Drevnej Tserkvi. T. 2. Istoriya Tserkvi v period Konstiantina. SPb., 1910.

13. Bratukhin, A.Yu. Tertullian i Kliment Aleksandrijskij. V sb.: Indoevropejskoe yazykoznanie i klassicheskaya filologiya – IX. Materialy chtenij, posvyaschennykh pamyati professora I.M. Tronskogo. SPb., 2005. S. 39–46.

14. Bratukhin, A.Yu. Tit Flavij Kliment – primiritel' protivopolozhnostej. V kn.: A.Yu. Bratukhin (red.), Kliment Aleksandrijskij. Uveschevanie k yazychnikam. Kto iz bogatykh spasetsya. SPb., 2006. S. 5–46.

15. Bratukhin, A.Yu. Rozhdenie stilya khristianskoj literatury (Kliment Aleksandrijskij i Tertullian). Avtoref. diss.… d-ra filol. nauk. SPb., 2016.

16. Buck, P.L. 1996: Athenagoras’s embassy. A literary fiction. Harvard Theological Review 89, 209‒226.

17. Buell, D.K. 2005: Why This New Race: Ethnic Reasoning in Early Christianity. New York.

18. Bychkov, V.V. Ehstetika pozdnej antichnosti. M., 1981.

19. Bychkov, V.V. Aesthetica patrum. Ehstetika Ottsov Tserkvi. Apologety. Blazhennyj Avgustin. M., 1995.

20. Chesnut, G.F. 1986: The First Christian Histories: Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Evagrius. Macon (Georgia).

21. Christensen, A.S. 1980: Lactantius the Historian. An Analysis of the De Mortibus Persecutorum. Copenhagen.

22. Ciholas, P. 2003: The Omphalos and the Cross: Pagans and Christians in Search of a Divine Center. Macon (Georgia).

23. Cook, J.G. 2010: Roman Attitudes Toward the Christians: From Claudius to Hadrian. Tübingen.

24. Desnitskij, A.S. Svoeobrazie «Poslaniya k Diognitu» i ego mesto v rannej apologetike. V sb.: Rannekhristianskie apologety II–IV vekov: Perevody i issledovaniya. M., 2000. S. 118–121.

25. Digeser, E.D. 2000: The Making of a Christian Empire: Lactantius and Rome. Ithaca–London.

26. Edwards, M. et al. 1999: Introduction: Apologetics in the Roman world. In: M. Edwards, M. Goodman, S. Price (eds.), Apologetics in the Roman Empire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians. Oxford.

27. Esler, P. 1987: Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts: The Social and Political Motivations of Lucan Theology. Cambridge, 1987.

28. Fiedrowicz, M. 2001: Apologie im frühen Christentum. Die Kontroverse um den christlichen Wahrheitsanpruch in den ersten Jahrhunderten. Paderborn.

29. Frend, W.H.C. 1965: Martyrdom and Persecution in the Early Church. A Study of Conflict from the Maccabees to Donatus. Oxford.

30. Gamble, H.Y. 1995: Books and Readers in the Early Church: A History of Early Christian Texts. New Haven.

31. Grant, R.M. 1988: Greek Apologists of the Second Century. London.

32. Garnak, A. Tserkov' i gosudarstvo vplot' do ustanovleniya gosudarstvennoj tserkvi. V sb.: Rannee khristianstvo. T. I. (Perevod s nemetskogo S. Sviridovoj). Moskva–Khar'kov, 2001. S. 305–350.

33. Henderson, T.P. 2011: The Gospel of Peter and Early Christian Apologetics: Rewriting the Story of Jesus’ Death, Burial, and Resurrection. Tübingen.

34. Jacobsen, A.-C. 2009: Apologetics and apologies – some definitions. In: J. Ulrich, A.-C. Jacobsen, M. Kahlos (eds.), Continuity and Discontinuity in Early Christian Apologetics. Frankfurt am Main.

35. Kannaday, W.C. 2004: Apologetic Discourse and the Scribal Tradition. Atlanta.

36. Kazakov, M.M. Khristianizatsiya Rimskoj imperii v IV veke. Smolensk, 2002.

37. Keresztes, P. 1967: The Emperor Hadrian's rescript to Minucius Fundanus. Phoenix 21, 120–129.

38. Kern, K.Eh. (arkhimandrit Kiprian). Patrologiya. T. I. Moskva–Parizh, 1996.

39. Kovács, P. 2009: Marcus Aurelius’ Rain Miracle and the Marcomannic Wars. Leiden–Boston.

40. Krivushin, I.V. Rannevizantijskaya tserkovnaya istoriografiya. SPb., 1998.

41. Loveday, A. 1999: The Acts of the Apostles as an apologetic text. In: M. Edwards, M. Goodman, S. Price (eds.), Apologetics in the Roman Empire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians. Oxford, 15–44.

42. MacMullen, R. 1984: Christianizing the Roman Empire (A.D. 100–400). New Haven–London.

43. Marguerat, D. 2002: The First Christian Historian: Writing the “Acts of the Apostles”. Cambridge.

44. Millar, F. 1977: The Emperor in the Roman World (31 B.C.–A.D. 337). London.

45. Minns, D. 2007: The Rescript of Hadrian. In: S. Parvis, P. Foster (eds.), Justin Martyr and His Worlds. Minneapolis (MN), 38–49

46. Minns, D., Parvis P. (eds.) 2009: Justin, Philosopher and Martyr. Apologies. Oxford.

47. Murav'ev, A.V. «Ehtot muzh propovedoval khristianstvo, sokhranyaya mantiyu filosofa...». V sb.: Rannekhristianskie apologety II–IV vekov: Perevody i issledovaniya. M., 2000. S. 39–44.

48. Nesselhauf, H. 1976: Hadrians Reskript an Minicius Fundanus. Hermes. Zeitschrift für klassische Philologie 104, 348–361.

49. Panteleev, A.D. Khristianstvo v Rimskoj imperii vo II–III vv.: K probleme vzaimootnoshenij novykh religioznykh techenij i traditsionnogo obschestva i gosudarstva. Dis.... kand. ist. nauk. SPb., 2004.

50. Panteleev, A.D. Molnienosnyj legion: khristianskaya legenda i real'nost'. Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 2: Istoriya 3, 2007. S. 143–149.

51. Pattison, S.E. 1990: A Study of the Apologetic Function of the Summaries of Acts. PhD thesis. Atlanta.

52. Preobrazhenskij, P.F. Tertullian i Rim. M., 1926.

53. Prokop'ev, S.M. Vozniknovenie khristianskoj istoricheskoj mysli: Origen Aleksandrijskij. M., 2010.

54. Prokop'ev, S.M. Khristianskaya istoricheskaya mysl' vo II i III stoletiyakh. Vestnik MGUP imeni Ivana Fedorova 12, 2011, S. 33–44.

55. Prostmeier, F.P. 2017: Die sogenannten Imperatoren in der Weltchronik des Theophilos von Antiochia. In: U. Heil, J. Ulrich (Hrsgg.), Kirche und Kaiser in Antike und Spätantike. Berlin–Boston.

56. Rankin, D. 2006: From Clement to Origen: The Social and Historical Context of the Church Fathers. Burlington.

57. Rankin, D. 2009: Athenagoras: Philosopher and Theologian. Farnham.

58. Rhee, H. 2005: Early Christian Literature: Christ and Culture in the Second and Third Centuries. The Apologies, Apocryphal Acts and Martyr Acts. New York.

59. Robbins, V. 1991: Luke-Acts: A mixed population seeks a home in the Roman Empire. In: A. Loveday (ed.), Images of Empire. Sheffield.

60. Schott, J.M. 2008: Christianity, Empire, and the Making of Religion in Late Antiquity. Philadelphia.

61. Sidorov, A.I. Kurs patrologii. Vozniknovenie tserkovnoj pis'mennosti. M., 1996.

62. Sterling, G. 1992: Historiography and Self-Definition: Josephos, Luke-Acts and Apologetic History. Leiden.

63. Strobel, K. 1993: Das Imperium Romanum im “3. Jahrhundert”: Modell einer historischen Krise? Stuttgart.

64. Sventsitskaya, I.S. 1988: Rannee khristianstvo: stranitsy istorii. M., 1988.

65. Sventsitskaya, I.S. Khristiane i imperatorskaya vlast' v apokrificheskikh skazaniyakh II–IV vv. (Pereosmyslenie istorii). V sb.: Antichnoe obschestvo – IV: Vlast' i obschestvo v antichnosti. SPb., 2001.

66. Sventsitskaya, I.S. Pervye khristiane i Rimskaya imperiya. M., 2003.

67. Tyulenev, V.M. Laktantsij: khristianskij istorik na perekrestke ehpokh. SPb., 2000.

68. Vascheva, I.Yu. Evsevij Kesarijskij i stanovlenie rannesrednevekovogo istorizma. SPb., 2006.

69. Vdovichenko, A.V. Khristianskaya apologiya. Kratkij obzor traditsii. V sb.: Rannekhristianskie apologety II–IV vekov: Perevody i issledovaniya. M., 2000. S. 5–38.

70. Walton, S. 2002: The state they were in: Luke’s view of the Roman Empire. In: P. Oakes (ed.), Rome in the Bible and the Early Church. Carlisle–Grand Rapids.

71. Wifstrand, A. 2005: The Roman Empire from the Greek perspective. In: L. Rydbeck, S. Porter (eds.), Epochs and Styles: Selected Writings on the New Testament, Greek Language and Greek Culture in the Post-Classical Era. Tübingen.

72. Wilhite, D.E. 2007: Tertullian the African: An Anthropological Reading of Tertullian’s Context and Identities. Berlin.

73. Yamazaki-Ransom, K. 2010: The Roman Empire in Luke’s narrative. London–New York.

74. Yoder, J. 2014: Representatives of Roman Rule: Roman Provincial Governors in Luke-Acts. Berlin–Munich–Boston.

75. Zholud', R.V. Nachalo pravoslavnoj publitsistiki: Bibliya, apologety, vizantijtsy. Voronezh, 2002.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up