Number of purchasers: 0, views: 411
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Albiol Sanchez J., Diaz-Serrano L., Teruel G. (2015) Is Self-employment a Way to Escape from Skill Mismatches? (No. 9008). Bonn: IZA Discussion Papers.
2. Ali M. (2021) A systematic literature review of sustainable entrepreneurship with thematic analysis. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. №17(4). DOI: 10.1108/WJEMSD-11-2020-0150.
3. Archer M.S. (2003) Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bernstein R.J. (2010) The Pragmatic Turn. Cambridge: Polity.
5. Bromley P., Meyer J.W. (2021) Hyper-management: Neoliberal expansions of purpose and leadership. Organization Theory. No. 2 (3) DOI: 10.1177/26317877211020327.
6. Brossard B., Sallee N. (2020) Sociology and psychology: What intersections? European Journal of Social Theory. No. 23(1): 3–14.
7. Cavazzoni F., Fiorini A., Veronese G. (2021) How do we assess how agentic we are? A literature review of existing instruments to evaluate and measure individuals' agency. Social Indicators Research. No. 159: 1125–1153.
8. Devyatko I. (2004) Sociological theories of activity and practical rationality. Moscow: Avanti Plus. (In Russ.)
9. Elchaninov M. (2022) The Era of global bifurcation: planetary problems and historical alternatives. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 124–135. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250018466-5. (In Russ.)
10. Emirbayer M., Misch A. (1998) What is agency? American journal of sociology. No. 103(4): 962–1023.
11. Fetisov V. (2022) Shaping the diagnosis to sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 14–28. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250022304-7. (In Russ.)
12. Filc D., Ram., U. (2015) Marxism after postmodernism: Rethinking the emancipatory political subject. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 22–32. (In Russ.)
13. Fligstein N., McAdam D. (2011) Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological theory. No. 29(1): 1–26.
14. Fligstein N., McAdam D. (2022) Fields theory. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.)
15. Goshin M.E., Sorokin P.S., Kosaretsky S.G. (2022) Agency of Schoolchildren in the Changing Educational Context during COVID-19 Pandemic: Sources, Manifestations, and Effects. Monitoring obshestvennovo mneniya: economicheskie I sotsialnyie izmeneniya [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 5: 394–417. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2022.5.2145. (In Russ.)
16. Joas H. (2005) Creativity of action. St. Peterburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)
17. Kluttz D.N., Fligstein N. (2016) Varieties of sociological field theory. In: Handbook of contemporary sociological theory. Ed. By S. Abrutyn. Springer: Cham:185–204.
18. Kravchenko S. (2022) Ambivalence of digitalization: demand for national-cultural model for sustainable development. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 29–37. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250020181-2. (In Russ.)
19. Maslovsky M. (2016) Inter-cultural interaction and social fields: new theoretical approaches in European and American sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 11–18. (In Russ.)
20. May C. (2013) Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science. No: 8(1): 1–14.
21. NRU HSE. A survey of full-time university students in the framework of Monitoring the economics of education. 2021/2022 academic year. (2023) Moscow. (In Russ.)
22. Opara M., Okafor O.N., Ufodike A., Kalu K. (2021) Institutional entrepreneurship: collaborative change in a complex Canadian organization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. No. 34(9): 284–314.
23. Piiroinen T. (2014) For “Central Conflation” A Critique of Archerian Dualism. Sociological theory. No. 32(2): 79–99.
24. Rebughini P.A. (2018) Critical Agency and the Future of Critique. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 3–16. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250002781-2. (In Russ.)
25. Ruotsalainen S., Elovainio M., Jantunen S., Sinervoa T. (2022) The mediating effect of psychosocial factors in the relationship between self-organizing teams and employee wellbeing: A cross-sectional observational study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. No. 138: 1–7.
26. Schofer E., Ramirez F.O., Meyer J.W. (2021) The societal consequences of higher education. Sociology of Education. No. 94(1): 1–19.
27. Shahar G. (2020) The subjective–agentic personality sector (SAPS): Introduction to the special issue on self, identity, and psychopathology. Journal of Personality. No. 88(1): 5–13.
28. Sorokin P. Froumin I. (2022) “Structure/agency” problem in the 21st century: changing social reality and research implications. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 7: 27–36. (In Russ.)
29. Sorokin P. S., Zykova A. V. (2021) «Transformative Agency» as a Subject of Research and Development in the 21st Century: A Review and Interpretation of International Experience. Monitoring obshestvennovo mneniya: economicheskie I sotsialnyie izmeneniya [Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes]. No. 5: 216–241. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.5.1858. (In Russ.)
30. Sorokin P.S., Froumin I.D. (2022) Education as a Source for Transformative Agency: Theoretical and Practical Issues. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. No. 1: 116–137.
31. Sosnowska J., Kuppens P., De Fruyt F., Hofmans J. (2019) A dynamic systems approach to personality: The Personality Dynamics (PersDyn) model. Personality and individual differences. No. 144: 11–18.
32. Каterniy I.V. (2021) Pоsthumanism. Humans in the era of new sociality: mеtаmоrphoses, narratives, dilemmas. Мoscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)