LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE OF A RUSSIAN CITY: SOCIOLOGICAL OPTICS

Occupation: Head of Department of Ethnology
Affiliation: Institute of History named after Sh. Mardjani
Address: Kazan, 7A Baturin St., Kazan, 420111, Russia

Journal name

Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya

Edition

Issue 2

Pages

72-82

Abstract

Studies of the urban linguistic landscape have gained popularity in Western scholarship, and the author of the article seeks to show how this topic is faring in in Russian socio-humanitarian sciences. The history of the linguistic landscape studies in the socio-humanitarian sciences of Russia begins in the late 1990s. The scholars were interested in the presence of the ethnic communities languages that gave the name to the Russian republics in the visual space of cities. The dominance of the Russian language, an insignificant presence of national languages and the gradual penetration of foreign languages were revealed. The process of renaming streets and city objects in the second decade of the 2000’s is analyzed. This is explained by the desire of the city authorities to shape an image of the city and local identity. During these years, the theme of “the right to the city” began to develop. This right follows from the commodification of language. In recent years, Russian scientists have considered the linguistic landscape a means of representing social groups and the multilingualism of the city. An important contribution of domestic science a quantitative method for collecting empirical data on the linguistic landscape and classifying linguistic signs located on city streets.

Keywords

language landscape, Russian city, socio-humanitarian research, Henri Lefebvre, social space

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by the grant No. 075-15-2021-616

Received

28.03.2023

Publication date

28.03.2023

Number of characters

15266

Cite

GOST	Gabdrakhmanova G. LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE OF A RUSSIAN CITY: SOCIOLOGICAL OPTICS // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2023. – Issue 2 C. 72-82 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250021396-8-1-en (circulation date: 04.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250021396-8
MLA	Gabdrakhmanova, Gulnara F "LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE OF A RUSSIAN CITY: SOCIOLOGICAL OPTICS." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 2 (2023):72-82. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250021396-8
APA	Gabdrakhmanova G. (2023). LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE OF A RUSSIAN CITY: SOCIOLOGICAL OPTICS. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (2), pp.72-82 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250021396-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 513

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aristova N. (2016) English Translations in the Urban Linguistic Landscape as a Marker of an Emerging Global City: The Case of Kazan, Russia. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. No. 231: 216–222.

2. Ваckhaus P. (2007) Linguistic Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

3. Baranova V., Fedorova K. (2017) (In)visibility and (non) existence: labor migrants and the St. Petersburg linguistic landscape. Gorodskiye issledovaniya i praktiki [Urban Studies and Practices]. Vol. 2. No. 1: 103–121. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/usp212017103-121

4. Baranova V.V., Fedorova K.S. (2020b) Growing visibility: migration and transformations in Saint Petersburg’s linguistic landscape. Laboratorium. Zhurnal sotsialʹnykh issledovaniy [Laboratorium. Russian Review of Social Research]. Vol. 2. No. 1: 48–80. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25285/2078-1938-2020-12-1-48-80

5. Baranova V.V., Fedorova K.S. (2020а) Regulation of the language landscape in Russian cities: multilingualism and inequality. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsialʹnoy politiki [The journal of social policy research]. Vol. 18. No. 4: 625–640. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-4-625-640

6. Breslavsky A.S. (2012) Post-Soviet Ulan-Ude: cultural space and images of the city (1991–2011). Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of the Buryat State University. (In Russ.)

7. Bylyakhyrova L.V., Sobakina I.V. (2022) Mutual influences of the Yakut and Russian languages on the territory of the city of Vilyuisk of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Altaistika [Altaistika]. No. 2 (05): 37–48. (In Russ.)

8. Dolgova A.P. (2002) To the question of the state of ergonymy in the conditions of bilingualism (on the example of the city of Cheboksary). In: Onomastics and languages of the Ural-Volga region: Proceedings of the regional conference. Cheboksary, November 13-14, 1997. Cheboksary: ChGIGN: 29–37. (In Russ.)

9. Dyrkheeva G.A. (2022) Buryat language in Ulan-Ude. In: International Round table "Urbanization and language space of the city: new challenges in the XXI century". Moscow, September 19-20, 2022. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbhZk6ABjDg&list=PLMlxxldt8fIovwZDnisdSIcU0DLT7A7Na (accessed 11.25.22). (In Russ.)

10. Fedorova K., Baranova V. (2018) Moscow: diversity in disguise. In: P. Heinrich, D. Smakman (eds) Urban Sociolinguistics. The City as a Linguistic Process and Experience. Routledge: 221–237.

11. Fedorova L.L. (2014) Language landscape: the city and the crowd. [Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: History, Philology]. Vol. 13. No. 6: Journalism: 70–80. (In Russ.)

12. Gabdrakhmanova G.F., Makhmutov Z.A., Sagdieva E.A. (2015) State languages of the Republic of Tatarstan in the region’s linguistic landscape. Kazan: Publishing house of the Institute of History named after Sh. Marjani of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan; Artefakt. (In Russ.)

13. Gabdrakhmanova G.F., Sagdieva E.A., Makhmutov Z.A. (2016) Ethno-linguistic landscape of the cities of the Republic of Tatarstan. In: State languages of the Republic of Tatarstan: multiplicity of measurements. Kazan: Institute of History. Sh. Marjani AN RT: 121–164. (In Russ.)

14. Golikova A.A. (2020) Methodology of linguistic and landscape studies in Russia: analytical and thematic review. Vestnik tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Bulletin of the Tver State University. series: Philosophy]. No. 4 (54): 149–166. (In Russ.)

15. Golomidova M.I. (2020) Toponymic image of urban spatial objects. Voprosy onomastiki [Problems of onomastics]. Vol. 17. No. 3: 263–278. (In Russ.)

16. Golomidova M.V. (2019) Urbanonyms as a resource for managing the perception of urban space. Kommunikativnyye issledovaniya [Communicative Research]. Vol. 6. No. 1: 11–30. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25513/2413-6182.2019.6(1).11–30.

17. Golomidova M.V. (2022) Municipal Toponymic Policy and Issues of Urban Toponymy Development. In: International Round Table "Urbanization and Language Space of the City: New Challenges in the 21st Century". Moscow, September 19-20, 2022. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbhZk6ABjDg&list=PLMlxxldt8fIovwZDnisdSIcU0DLT7A7Na (accessed 11.25.22). (In Russ.)

18. Hèctor Alòs i Font (2019) Written use of languages in the social space of the cities of the Chuvash Republic In: D.V. Egorov (eds) Chavash halakh istoriiyepe kulturin sivech yytavesem: articlesen pukhkhi = Topical issues of the history and culture of the Chuvash people: a collection of articles. Vol. 4. Cheboksary: ChGIGN: 153–182. (In Russ.)

19. Hèctor Alòs i Font, Makhmutov Z.A. (2016) Theoretical and methodological foundations of a quantitative study of the linguistic landscape of Russian cities (on the example of the cities of the Republic of Chuvashia and Tatarstan). In: O.G. Vladimirova, A.M. Ivanova (eds) Ashmarin readings: collection of works of the X International Scientific and Practical Conference (Cheboksary, October 20-21, 2016). Cheboksary: Chuvash University Press: 99–104. (In Russ.)

20. Ismagilova G.Kh. (2011) Linguistic features of visual and information attributes of the city in the framework of the implementation of the law on the languages of the Republic of Tatarstan: Dis. cand. philol. sciences. Kazan. (In Russ.)

21. Ismagilova N.V. (2007) The language of the city of Ufa: the functioning of various language subsystems and bilingualism. Ufa. (In Russ.)

22. Ivanov V.V. (2021) The Buryat language in the linguistic landscape and language practices in Ulan-Ude. Sotsiolingvistika [Sociolinguistics]. No. 1 (5): 147–163. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.37892/2713- 2951-2021-1-5-147-163

23. Ivanova N.I. (2017) Sociolinguistic aspects of the functioning of the Yakut language in Yakutsk: figures and facts. Monograph. P.A. Sleptsov (eds.). Moscow. (In Russ.)

24. Jingpeng L. (2021) Research of the linguistic landscape and its analysis in Russia and China. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual'nyye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Gumanitarnyye nauki. [Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series: Humanities]. No. 7: 162–167. (In Russ.) DOI 10.37882/2223-2982.2021.07.21

25. Kaplunova M.Ya. (2018) Functional development of the Chinese and Vietnamese languages in Moscow. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana [Acta Linguistica Petropolitana]. Vol. XIV, part 3. Saint-Petersburg: OR RAN: 153–162. (In Russ.)

26. Khilkhanova E.V. (2022) The Language of Social Networks of Migrants from Central Asia in the Context of Russian Urban Multilingualism. In: International Round Table "Urbanization and Language Space of the City: New Challenges in the 21st Century". Moscow, September 19-20, 2022. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbhZk6ABjDg&list=PLMlxxldt8fIovwZDnisdSIcU0DLT7A7Na (accessed 11.25.22). (In Russ.)

27. Khuzangay A.P. (1999) The problem of the linguistic existence of the Chuvash ethnos and the prospects for language policy In: Problems of the national in the development of the Chuvash ethnos. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 1999: 88–106. (In Russ.)

28. Landry R., Bourhis R.Y. (1997) Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An Empirical Study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. Vol. 16. No. 1: 23–49.

29. Lifen L., Juan Wu, Yaqian Zh. (2019) Comparison of the spatial configuration of the linguistic landscape of Chinese and Russian universities. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political Linguistics]. No. 5 (77): 185–192. DOI 10.26170/pl19-05-20. (In Russ.)

30. Malkova V.K. (2022) Ethno-cultural diversity of the capital of Russia or "Whoever you behave with, that's what you'll get.". Moscow: IEA RAN. (In Russ.)

31. Manchurina L.E., Sotnikova Yu.V. (2021) Translation of texts of signboards as a realization of bilingualism in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) (on the example of the city of Yakutsk). Mir nauki. Sotsiologiya, filologiya, kul'turologiya [World of Science. Sociology, philology, cultural studies]. No. 1. URL: https://sfk-mn.ru/PDF/04FLSK121.pdf (accessed 11.27.22). (In Russ.)

32. Mikhailyukova N.V. (2017) Names of auto business enterprises in the language of the city of Vladivostok: genre aspect. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University]. No 3: 51–58. (In Russ.)

33. Mukharyamov N.M., Mukharyamova L.M. (2018) Language and Society. Encyclopedia. Moscow: OOO "Metatext", 2017. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological research]. No. 12: 149–153. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003180-1

34. Nasritdinov E. (2016) ‘Only by learning how to live together differently can we live together at all’: readability and legibility of Central Asian migrants’ presence in urban Russia. Central Asian Survey. Vol. 35. No. 2: 257–275.

35. Peshkova N.P. (2017) Linguistic landscape of a polyethnic city: Peculiarities of verbal influence. Voprosy psikholingvistiki [Journal of Psycholinguistics]. No. 3 (33): 108–125. (In Russ.)

36. Protassova E.Yu. (2021) Interculturality in the Modern Russian Linguistic Landscape. Philological Class. Vol. 26. No. 2: 52–67. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.51762/1FK-2021-26-02-04

37. Razumov R.V. (2016) Typology of models of urbanonymic systems of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Kostromskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Kostroma University]. No. 4: 121–125. (In Russ.)

38. Razumov R.V. (2022) Urbanonymic system of a polylingual city. In: International Round table "Urbanization and linguistic space of the city: new challenges in the XXI century". Moscow, September 19-20, 2022. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbhZk6ABjDg&list=PLMlxxldt8fIovwZDnisdSIcU0DLT7A7Na (accessed 11.25.2022). (In Russ.)

39. Rivlina A.A. (2014) Interaction of English and Russian languages in the linguistic landscape of a modern Russian city. Sotsial'nyye i gumanitarnyye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke [Social and humanitarian sciences in the Far East]. No. 2 (42): 110–115. (In Russ.)

40. Rudenkin D.V. (2022) What the youth of a large Russian city knows and thinks about vandalism: the case of Yekaterinburg. Sotsiodinamika [Sociodynamics]. No. 6: 47–62. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2022.6.34435 (In Russ.)

41. Saduov R.T. (2020) Field study of the cultural and linguistic landscape in the national republic: description and justification of the project. Ekologiya yazyka i kommunikativnaya praktika [Ecology of language and communicative practice]. No. 1: 23-29. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17516/2311-3499-098

42. Sidorova L.A., Ferguson D., Vallikivi L. (2014) Linguistic landscape of the northern village as a product of cultural industries (for example, the village of Chersky of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). In: M.L. Magidovich (eds) Modern models of the development of cultural industries in the regions of Russia. Saint-Petersburg: Russian State University. A.I. Herzen: 195–204. (In Russ.)

43. Sinekopova G.V. (2015) Linguistic minorities in the linguistic landscape of Moscow. Vestnik Rossiyskogo novogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Russian New University. Series: Man in the modern world]. No. 2: 45–49. (In Russ.)

44. Sokolova T.P. (2016) Commercial urbanonyms of Russia in the aspect of naming expertise. Tsennosti i smysly [Values and meanings]. Vol. 1. No. 6 (46): 79–86. (In Russ.)

45. Sokolova T.P. (2022) Commodification of the toponymy of modern Moscow in the sociolinguistic aspect. In: International Round Table "Urbanization and language space of the city: new challenges in the XXI century". Moscow, September 19-20, 2022. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbhZk6ABjDg&list=PLMlxxldt8fIovwZDnisdSIcU0DLT7A7Na (accessed 11.25.22). (In Russ.)

46. Solnyshkina M., Ismagilova A. (2015) Linguistic Landscape Westernization and Glocalization: the case of Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan. XLinguae Journal. Vol. 8 Iss. 2: 36–53.

47. Terentiev E.A. (2015) Toponymic activism and the “right to the city”: sociological notes. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. [Tomsk State University Bulletin. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science]. No. 1 (29): 194–202. (In Russ.) DOI 10.17223/1998863Х/29/21

48. Tkhakakhov V.Kh. (2017) City Map: Symbolic Transformation of Space in the North Caucasus. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociologi¬cal Studies]. No. 5: 17–25. (In Russ.)

49. Trapeznikova A.A. (2009) To the question of the classification of ergonyms (based on the commercial names of Krasnoyarsk). Mir nauki, kulʹtury, obrazovaniya [World of science, culture, education]. No. 2 (14): 68–70. (In Russ.)

50. Vysotsky S.S. (1984) About the Moscow folk dialect. In: Urban vernacular. Problems of study. Moscow: 22–37. (In Russ.)

51. Yurchak A. (2000) Privatize your name: symbolic work in a Post-Soviet linguistic market. Journal of Sociolinguistics. Nо. 4 (3): 406–434.