Trust of Private Businesses in State Regulatory Enforcement Authorities

 
PIIS013216250018750-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250018750-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: lead researcher
Affiliation: Center of Public Administration Technologies, Institute of Applied Economic Studies, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Address: Russian Federation, 82 Vernadsky prosp., Moscow, 119571
Occupation: director
Affiliation: Center of Public Administration Technologies, Institute of Applied Economic Studies, RANEPA, Moscow, Russia
Address: Russian Federation, 82 Vernadsky prosp., Moscow, 119571
Occupation: director
Affiliation: Center of Social and Political Monitoring, Institute of Public Sciences, RANEPA
Address: Russian Federation, 82 Vernadsky prosp., Moscow, 119571
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 5
Pages49-59
Abstract

Trust to public institutes is an important driver of public policy effectiveness in various areas. In literature it is common to analyze trust in government or certain public institutions by total population. However, such indicator may not reflect the specifics of certain groups. This article based on sociological survey conducted in 2021 evaluates the trust in state regulatory control bodies by representatives of private businesses. It is demonstrated that the trust in state regulatory enforcement authorities on the part of businesses who had experience in interacting with such bodies is higher compared to the one measured for total population. The gap is explained by the fact that business trust is influenced by perceptions of personal experience in dealing with state regulatory enforcement bodies, performance and integrity of these authorities. Noteworthy, business trust in state regulatory enforcement bodies is also correlated with perceptions of quality of regulations which are the subject for inspections by the authorities in question.  

Keywordsbusiness, trust, inspection, regulatory enforcement authorities, regulation, risks of harm, sociological survey
AcknowledgmentThe article was funded by the state assignment on research and development studies to RANEPA.
Received21.02.2022
Publication date21.06.2022
Number of characters28107
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 566

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Auzan A.A., Komissarov A.G., Bakhtigaraeva A.I. (2019) S ociocultural restrictions on the commercialization of innovations in R ussia. Ekonomicheskaya Politika [Economic Policy ]. Vol. 14. No. 4:76-95 (In Russ.)

2. Dobrolyubova E. I., Yuzhakov V. N., Pokida A. N., Zybunovskaya N. V. (2020) How citizens evaluate safety from state-controlled risks and why. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies ] Vol . 46. No . 7:70-81 (In Russ .)

3. Mersiyanova I. V., Yakimets V. N., Pakhomova E. I. (2012). Citizens’Trust to Public Servants’Performance. Public Administration Issues. No.4:98-119 ( In Russ.)

4. Pushkareva G.V. (2019) Trust in the Public Space of Government. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyj vestnik [E-Journal Public Administration]. No.76:151-175 (In Russ.)

5. Yuzhakov V. N., Dobrolyubova E. I., Pokida A. N., Zybunovskaya N. V. (2020) Evaluating performance of regulatory enforcement activities by businesses: key trends. Public Administration Issues. No.2:32-53 (In Russ.)

6. Alessandro M., Lagomarsino B.C., Scartascini C., Streb J., Torrealday J. (2021) Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment. World Development. Vol. 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105223.

7. Batrancea L., Nichita A., Olsen J., Kogler C., Kirchler E., Hoelzl E., Weiss A., Torgler B., Fooken J., Fuller J., Schaffner M., Banuri S., Hassanein M., Alarcуn-Garcнa G., Aldemir C., Apostol O., Weinberg D., Ioan B., Belianin A., Zukauskas S. (2019) Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology . Vol. 74. Art. 102191.

8. Ball C., Burt G., De Vries F., MacEachern E. (2018) How environmental protection agencies can promote eco-innovation: The prospect of voluntary reciprocal legitimacy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 129 : 242-253

9. Beshi T.D., Kaur R. (2020) Public Trust in Local Government: Explaining the Role of Good Governance Practices. Public Organizations Review. Vol. 20 : 337– 350 .

10. Braithwaite V., Levi M. (2003) Trust and Governance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

11. Christensen T., Lægreid P. (2005) Trust in government: The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography . Public Performance & Management Review. Vol. 28( 4): 487-511,

12. Gunningham N., Sinclair D. (2009). Regulation and the role of trust: Reflections from the mining industry . Journal of Law and Society. Vol. 36(2): 167-194

13. Dobos P., Takács-György. (2020) The impact of the relationship between the state, state institutions and tax payers on willingness to pay tax . Serbian Journal of Management. Vol. 15(1): 69-80.

14. Harring N. (2018) Trust and state intervention: Results from a Swedish survey on environmental policy support. Environmental Science and Policy. Vol. 82 : 1-8.

15. He C., Han G., Liu Y. (2019) Food safety satisfaction in China and its influencing factors: Empirical study with a hierarchical linear model. Safety. V ol. 5(1):17.

16. Kampen J., Van De Walle S., Bouckaert G. (2006) Assessing the Relation Between Satisfaction with Public Service Delivery and Trust in Government. The Impact of the Predisposition of Citizens Toward Government on Evalutations of Its Performance. Public Performance & Management Review. Vol. 29( 4): 387-404.

17. Keefer P., Rojas M A. M., Scartascini C., Valle L. J. (2020). Trust to Advance Inclusive Growth . In: Nuguer, V., Powell, A. (Eds.), Inclusion in Times of Covid-19. Inter-American Development Bank : 41– 52.

18. Lesné F. (2017) Measuring corruption in business surveys : current practice and perspectives. Economics and Finance. Universitй Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020], URL: https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02091001/file/2017CLFAD014_LESNE.pdf (accessed 25.01.2022).

19. Malkina M.Y., Ovchinnikov V.N., Kholodilin K.A. (2021) Changing fortunes and attitudes: What determines the political trust in modern Russia? Oeconomia Copernicana. Vol. 12(1) : 77-98.

20. Masud A., Manaf N., Natrah S. (2014). Do Trust and Power Moderate Each Other in Relation to Tax Compliance? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 164: 49-54

21. Morris S., Klesner J. (2010) Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence From Mexico. Comparative Political Studies. Vol.43(10) :1258– 1285 .

22. OECD (2017) Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust . Paris: OECD Publishing .

23. OECD (2018) Trust and its determinants: Evidence from the Trustlab experiment (Tech. rep.). Paris: OECD Publishing.

24. Stoyan A. T., Niedzwiecki S., Morgan J., Hartlyn J., Espinal R. (2016). Trust in government institutions: The effects of performance and participation in the Dominican Republic and Haiti. International Political Science Review. Vol. 37(1): 18– 35.

25. Vainio A., Mäkiniemi J.-P., Paloniemi R. (2014) System justification and the perception of food risks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Vo l. 17(4): 509-523.

26. Yapp C., Fairman R. (2006) Factors affecting food safety compliance within small and medium-sized enterprises: Implications for regulatory and enforcement strategies. Food Control. Vol. 17 (1): 42-51 .

Figures (Word) (СОЦИС_рисунки_ворд.docx, 21 Kb) [Download]

Figures (Excel) (Диаграммы_СОЦИС.xlsx, 23 Kb) [Download]

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up