Grumbling ‘Oldies’, Whining ‘Youngsters’, and Progress of Sociology

 
PIIS013216250018033-9-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250018033-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 2
Pages3-11
Abstract

The article is presenting the author's approach to the problem of progress in contemporary sociology. Two kinds of the crisis discourse questioning the sociology’s progress are analyzed. Such discourses are associated with the different generations of sociologists who consider in different ways conceptual, institutional, and instrumental changes in the scientific discipline. The progress in the recent history of sociology is traced in the form of tendencies towards more complex and coherent representations of social order / structures, social action / agency, and social change / development. The progress in sociological theory and methodology is approved. The article argues the special role of post-virtualization processes and digitalization routine in formation of the structures, agency patterns, and social development models which define actual agenda in studies of sociology’s fundamental subjects: social order, social action, and social change. 

Keywordssociology, scientific progress, structure, agency, social development, digitalization routine
Received16.02.2022
Publication date18.03.2022
Number of characters26985
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 774

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Baehr W. P. (2020) The Arrest of Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 3–15. (In Russ.)

2. Weber M. (1990) Selected Works. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

3. Šubrt J. (2021) Reflections on Modern Russian Sociology and its Prospects. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 5–15. (In Russ.)

4. Campbell C. (2019) Has Sociology Progressed? Reflections of an Accidental Academic. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

5. Castells M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

6. Go J. (2020) Race, Empire, and Epistemic Exclusion: Or the Structures of Sociological Thought. Sociological Theory. Vol. 38. Iss. 2, June: 79–100.

7. Go J., Lawson G. (2017) Global Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

8. House J.S. (2019) Culminating Crisis in American Sociology and its Role in Social Sciences and Public Policy: An Autobiographical, Mulitmethod, Reflexive Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol 45. No.1: 1–19.

9. Knorr Cetina K. (2009) The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World. Symbolic Interaction. Vol. 32. Issue 1: 61–87.

10. Kuhn T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

11. Latour B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: University Press.

12. Patil V. (2018) The Heterosexual Matrix as Imperial Effect. Sociological Theory. No. 36 (1): 1–26.

13. Urry J. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up