Russians  Views on the Necessary Social Policy: Between Mid 2000-ies and the Corona Crisis of 2020

The article is based on data from All-Russian studies of the FCTAS RAS 2006-2020 and describes the characteristics of the welfare attitudes of Russians. It is shown that the idea of liberalizing social policy is out of expectations of Russians, and not because of the “dependеnt culture” but due to the lack of opportunities to solve problems on their own: limited access to social infrastructure, poorly functioning institutions, lack of their own financial resources. Together with the constant deterioration of the social sphere conditions it determines the necessity for an operational response by this state. The main points of the social agenda, according to the population, are the implementation of the humanitarian functions of the state (with an emphasis on the healthcare sector) and guarantees of institutional conditions. The Russians' expectations regarding the general logic of welfare policy are quite homogeneous among various social groups. It is slightly impacted by the current stage of the life cycle. Over the past 15 years, the attitude for social policy among Russians has become more conscious and balanced, with an understanding of the limited state capabilities. That is why, even before the pandemic, targeting was a key characteristic of the desired social support. The 2020 crisis situation did not exacerbate paternalistic sentiments, as it was in 2009 thus indicating relevant stability of Russians expectations from state and a chance to construe a new configuration of the social contract on their basis.

Keywords

social policy, social contract, welfare attitudes, public administration

Acknowledgment

The article is prepared thanks to assistance by Russian Science Foundation Grant No. 17-78-20125-P.

Received

20.04.2021

Publication date

04.05.2021

Number of characters

29765

Cite

GOST	Lezhnina J. Russians ' Views on the Necessary Social Policy: Between Mid 2000-ies and the Corona Crisis of 2020 // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya – 2021. – Issue 4 C. 50-60 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/socis/s013216250014715-9-1-en (circulation date: 16.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250014715-9
MLA	Lezhnina, Julia "Russians ' Views on the Necessary Social Policy: Between Mid 2000-ies and the Corona Crisis of 2020." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya 4 (2021):50-60. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250014715-9
APA	Lezhnina J. (2021). Russians ' Views on the Necessary Social Policy: Between Mid 2000-ies and the Corona Crisis of 2020. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (4), pp.50-60 DOI: 10.31857/S013216250014715-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 926

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avraamova E.M. O prostranstve vozmozhnostej reformirovaniya sotsial'noj sfery // Obsche-stvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2006. №3. S. 18–22 [Avraamova E.M. (2006) About the space of opportunities for reforming the social sphere. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Modernity]. No 3: 18–22. (In Russ.)]

2. Anikin V.A., Lezhnina Yu.P., Mareeva S.V., Slobodenyuk E.D. Kto i pochemu ischet gosudarstven-noj podderzhki v novoj Rossii? // Mir Rossii. 2020. T. 29. № 1. S. 31–52. [Anikin V.A., Lezhnina Y.P., Mareeva S.V., Slobodenyuk E.D. (2020) Who is looking for the state support in the modern Russia and why? Mir Rossii [World of Russia]. Vol. 29. No. 1: 31–52. (In Russ.)]

3. Dmitriev M.Eh., Nikol'skaya A.V. Osennij perelom v soznanii rossiyan: mimoletnyj vsplesk ili novaya tendentsiya? // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2019. № 2. C. 19–34. [Dmitriev M.E., Nikol'skaya A.V. (2019) Osenniy perelom v soznanii rossiyan: mimoletnyi vsplesk ili novaya tendenciya? Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Mo-dernity]. No. 2: 19-34. (In Russ.)]

4. Salmina A.A. Pomenyalis' li vzglyady rossiyan na sotsial'nuyu politiku? Analiz dinamiki i sravnenie s drugimi stranami. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. №12. C. 91-103 [Salmina A. A. (2019) Have the views of Russians on social policy changed? Dynamics analysis and comparison with other countries. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 12: 91–103 (In Russ.)]

5. Tikhonova N.E., Lezhnina Yu.P., Mareeva S.V., Anikin V.A., Karavaj A.V., Slobodenyuk E.D. Mo-del' dokhodnoj stratifikatsii rossijskogo obschestva: dinamika, faktory, mezhstranovye sravneniya. M.; SPb.: Nestor - Istoriya, 2018. [Tihonova N.E., Lezhnina Yu.P., Mareeva S.V., Anikin V.A., Karavay A.V., Slobodenyuk E.D. (2018) Model' dohodnoy stratifikacii ros-siyskogo obshchestva: dinamika, faktory, mezhstranovye sravneniya [The model of income strati-fication of Russian society: dynamics, factors, cross-country comparisons]. Moscow; SPb.: Nes-tor- Istoriya. (In Russ.)]

6. Andreß H.-J., Heien T. (2001) Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States. European Sociological Review. No. 17(4): 337–356.

7. Arts W., Gelissen J. (2001) Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really mat-ter? Acta Sociologica. No. 44(4): 283–299.

8. Baute S., Meuleman B., Abts K. (2018) Measuring Attitudes towards Social Europe: A Multidimen-sional Approach. Social Indicators Research. No. 137(1): 353–378.

9. Bean C., Papadakis E. (1993) Popular Support for the Welfare State: A Comparison between Institu-tional Regimes. Journal of Public Policy. No. 13.

10. Blekesaune M. (2013) Economic strain and public support for redistribution: A comparative analysis of 28 European countries. Journal of Social Policy. No. 42(1): 57–72.

11. Blekesaune M., Quadagno J. (2003) Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies: A Comparative Analysis of 24 Nations. European Sociological Review. No. 19.

12. Chung H., Meuleman B. (2017) European parents’ attitudes towards public childcare provision: the role of current provisions, interests and ideologies. European Societies. No. 19(1): 49-68.

13. Domanski H., Heyns B. Toward a Theory of the Role of the State in Market Transition: From Bargain-ing to Markets in Post-Communism. European Journal of Sociology (Archives Européennes de Sociologie). No. 36.

14. Edlund J. (2006) Trust in the capability of the welfare state and general welfare state support: Sweden 1997–2002. Acta Sociologica. No. 49(4): 395–417.

15. Finseras H. (2009) Income inequality and demand for redistribution: A multilevel analysis of European public opinion. Scandinavian Political Studies. No. 32(1): 94–119.

16. Gelissen J. (2002) Worlds of Welfare, Worlds of Consent? Public Opinion on the Welfare State. Pub-lisher: Brill, N.H.E.J., N.V. Koninklijke Boekhandel en Drukkerij.

17. Groskind F. (1994) Ideological influences on public support for assistance to poor families. Social Work. No. 39: 81–89.

18. Jæger M.M. (2006) Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: the regime hypothesis revis-ited. European Sociological Review. No. 22(2): 157–170.

19. Mason D.S., Kluegel J., Wegener B. (1995) Social justice and political change: Public opinion in capi-talist and post-communist states. New York: A. de Gruyter.

20. Svallfors S. (2003) Welfare Regimes and Welfare Opinions: A Comparison of Eight Western Coun-tries. Social Indicators Research. No. 64.

21. Taylor-Gooby P., Leruth B. (eds) (2018) Attitudes, Aspirations and Welfare: Social Policy Directions in Uncertain Times.Basinkstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

22. Williams T., Hill M., Davies R. (1999) Attitudes to the Welfare State and the Response to Reform (A Report of Qualitative and Quantitive Research on Attitudes to the Welfare State and to Pro-posals for Reform / Research report (Great Britain. Dept. of Social Security), 88. Corporate Doc-ument Services.