Demand for the Eras

 
PIIS013216250013029-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250013029-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Assoc. Prof., Faculty of Economic Sciences
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 3
Pages3-16
Abstract

Based on the concept of subjectively perceived history, the citizens' demand for historical types of social conditions that existed at different stages of Russian development in the Soviet and Post–soviet period (1950–2019) is estimated. We use a method that allows us to construct a continuous curve of "demand for eras" on the basis of a free choice of years in which the well-being of an individual and his reference group was maximized (minimized) due to certain set of goods (bads) inherent in these years. The limits of transformation of the demand curve for eras in connection with future changes in the relative weight of Soviet generations and Millennials in Russian society are shown. Changes within these limits do not qualitatively change its current form. It is shown that the growth of the social value of a modern period of history can be achieved on the basis of a set of goods identical to the ones of the era of "developed socialism". The degree of polarization of historical memory is measured by period: the polarization is minimal in relation to the 1960s–1970s, the 1990s (with a negative sign), and the first decade of the 2000s, but increases in relation to the second half of the 1980s and the second decade of the 2000s. Along with financial and economic difficulties, the latter period is characterized by a perceived lack of psychological integrity, but its potential is determined by the historical vote for it of the younger part of Millennials. It is statistically proved that individual differences in choosing the best era and the differentiation of views on the era of the 2000s are determined by belonging to a generation, income, level of education and family composition.

Keywordssocial preferences, gross national happiness, post-communist nostalgia, historical memory, historical conscious
AcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant No. 16-18-10270.
Received19.03.2021
Publication date26.03.2021
Number of characters30624
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1011

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Abramov R.N. (2019) Attitude to the Late Soviet Past as an Object of Sociological Research. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 5: 108–120. (In Russ.)

2. Barash R.E. (2019) The Historical Memory of the Russia’s Citizens Under the Influence of Current Social and Political Context. Sotsial'no-politicheskie nauki [Social and political sciences]. Vol. 9. No. 5: 22–27. (In Russ.)

3. Boele O. (2011) Remembering Brezhnev in the New Millennium: Post-Soviet Nostalgia and Local Identity in the City of Novorossiisk. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review. Vol. 38: 3–29.

4. Bowd G. (2016) (N)ostalgie? Communism in French literature since 1989. French Cultural Studies. Vol. 27. No. 4: 361–371.

5. Evans A.B., Jr. (1977) Developed Socialism in Soviet Ideology. Soviet Studies. Vol. 29. No. 3: 409–428

6. Fabrykant M., Magun V. (2019) Dynamics of National Pride Attitudes in Post-Soviet Russia, 1996–2015. Nationalities Papers. Vol. 47. No. 1: 20–37.

7. Frey B.S., Stutzer A. (2010) Happiness and Public Choice. Public Choice. Vol. 144. No. 3/4: 557–573.

8. Gorshkov M.K., Petukhov V.V. (eds.) (2017) Russian Society and Challenges of the Time. Book Five. Moscow: Ves’ Mir. (In Russ.)

9. Gorshkov M.K., Sheregi F.E. (2020) The Youth of Russia under the Lens of Sociology: Results of Years of Research. Мoscow: FNISTS RAN. (In Russ.)

10. Latov Y.V. (2018) Paradoxes of Memory of the Recent Past: USSR under Brezhnev, Russia under Yeltsin and Putin in Perception of the Current Generation of Russians. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies]. No. 5: 116–133. (In Russ.)

11. Lee M. (2011) Nostalgia as a Feature of "Glocalization": Use of the Past in Post-Soviet Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 27. No. 2: 158–177.

12. Matejova M. (2018) Why Was 'Communism Better'? Rethinking Inequality and the Communist Nostalgia in Central Europe. Journal of Comparative Politics. Vol. 11. No. 1: 66–83.

13. Nye J.S. (2009) Get Smart: Combining Hard and Soft Power. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 88. No. 4: 160–163.

14. Pillay D. (2020) Happiness, Wellbeing and Ecosocialism – a Radical Humanist Perspective. Globalizations. Vol. 17. No. 2: 380–396.

15. Shirokalova G.S. (2020) Historical Memory of the Young People: Village vs. City. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 28–37. (In Russ.)

16. Schmid U. (2010) Constitution and Narrative: Peculiarities of Rhetoric and Genre in the Foundational Laws of the USSR and the Russian Federation. Studies in East European Thought. Vol. 62. No. 3: 431–451.

17. Todorova M., Zsuzsa G. (eds) (2010) Post-Communist Nostalgia. N.Y., Oxford: Berghahn Books.

18. Toshchenko Zh. T. (2000) Historical Consciousness and Historical Memory. Analysis of the Current State. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia [New and recent history]. No. 4: 3–14. (In Russ.)

19. Zarubina N.N. (2017) Historical Memory as a Source of Knowledge About the Specifics of the Russian Civilization. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' [Social Sciences and Contemporary World]. No. 2: 52–63. (In Russ.)

20. Zweynert J. (2014) ‘Developed Socialism’ and Soviet Economic Thought in the 1970s and Early ’80s. Russian History. Vol. 41: 354–372.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up