The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Balancing between Culturalism and Scientism

 
PIIS013216250012418-2-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250012418-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: Sociological Institute of FCTAS RAS
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 2
Pages26-38
Abstract

The Strong Program in cultural sociology by J. Alexander and his colleagues since the mid-1980s is considered а major carrier of the cultural turn in sociology. Supporters and critics of the Strong Program tend to focus on its central thesis of “cultural autonomy” and on the challenge it poses to traditional, institutionally oriented social science. On the contrary, the article focuses on the “scientific” intensions of the Strong Program and the resulting ambiguities, limitations and contradictions for cultural-sociological theorizing. 

Keywordscultural sociology, cultural autonomy, scientism, analytical theorizing, sociological paradigm of civilizational analysis
AcknowledgmentThe work was supported by RFBR (Research project No. 19-011-00950).
Received24.02.2021
Publication date25.03.2021
Number of characters37497
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1100

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Adams S. (2019) Beyond a Socio-Centric Concept of Culture: Johann Arnason’s Macro-Phenomenology and Critique of Sociological Solipsism. Thesis Eleven. No. 1: 96–116.

2. Adams S., Arnason J. P. (2016) Sociology, Philosophy, History: A Dialogue. Social Imaginaries. No. 1: 151–190.

3. Alexander J.C. (1996) Cultural Sociology or Sociology of Culture? Culture. No. 3–4: 1–5.

4. Alexander J.C., Smith Ph. (2003) The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics. In: Alexander J.C. (ed.) The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 11–26.

5. Alexander J.C., Smith Ph. (2010) The Strong Program: Origins, Achievements, and Prospects. In: Hall J.R., Grindstaff L., Lo M.-Ch. (eds) Handbook of Cultural Sociology. London; New York: Routledge: 13–24.

6. Alexander J.C., Smith Ph. (2013) The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Elements of a Structural Hermeneutics. In: Alexander J. (ed.) The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Moscow: Praksis: 56–94. (In Russ.)

7. Alexander J.C., Smith Ph. (2019) The Strong Program: Meaning First. In: Grindstaff L., Lo M.-Ch., Hall J.R. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Cultural Sociology: 2nd Edition. London; New York: Routledge: 13–22.

8. Alexander J. C. (1982) Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Vol. 1: Positivism, Presuppositions, and Current Controversies. London: Taylor & Francis.

9. Alexander J. C. (1990) Introduction: Understanding the “Relative Autonomy” of Culture. In: Alexander J. C., Seidman S. (eds) Culture and Society: Contemporary Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 1–27.

10. Alexander J. C. (2007) Analytical Debates: Understanding the “Relative Autonomy” of Culture. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [The Russian Sociological Review]. No. 1: 17–37. (In Russ.)

11. Alexander J. C. (2010) On the Intellectual Origins of “Strong Program”. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [The Russian Sociological Review]. No. 2: 5–10. (In Russ.)

12. Alexander J. C. (2013) Local Cosmopolitanism. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 134–136. (In Russ.)

13. Arnason J. P. (2001) Civilizational Patterns and Civilizing Processes. International Sociology. No. 3: 387–405.

14. Arnason J. P. (2003) Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden; Boston: Brill.

15. Arnason J. P. (2010a) The Cultural Turn and the Civilizational Approach. European Journal of Social Theory. No. 1: 67–82.

16. Arnason J. P. (2010b) Interpreting History and Understanding Civilizations. In: Joas H., Klein B. (eds) The Benefit of Broad Horizons: Intellectual and Institutional Preconditions for a Global Social Science: Festschrift for Bjorn Wittrock on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Leiden: Brill: 167–184.

17. Bachmann-Medick D. (2017) Cultural Turns New Orientations in the Study of Culture. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie. (In Russ.)

18. Camic C., Joas H. (2004) The Dialogical Turn in Contemporary Sociological Theory. In: Camic C., Joas H. (eds) The Dialogical Turn: New Roles for Sociology in the Postdisciplinary Age. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield: 1–19.

19. Farkhatdinov N. (2010) “Culture and Method.” One More Product of Cultural Sociological Factory. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [The Russian Sociological Review]. No. 2: 118–123. (In Russ.)

20. Giddens A. (2005) The Constitution of Society. Moscow: Akadem. proekt. (In Russ.)

21. Gouldner A. (2003) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)

22. Joas H., Knobl W. (2011) Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)

23. Kane A. (1991) Cultural Analysis in Historical Sociology: The Analytic and Concrete Forms of the Autonomy of Culture. Sociological Theory. No. 1: 53–69.

24. Kravchenko S. A. (2010) J. Alexander’s Cultural Sociology: Genesis, Concepts, Possibilities of Tools. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 13-22. (In Russ.)

25. Kurakin D. (2010) Editor’s Afterword: The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Commentaries on Theory, Methodology, and History. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie [Russian Sociological Review]. No. 2: 155–178. (In Russ.)

26. McLennan G. (2005) The “New American Cultural Sociology”: An Appraisal. Theory, Culture & Society. No. 6: 1–18.

27. Olick J. K. (2010) What is “The Relative Autonomy of Culture”? In: Hall J. R., Grindstaff L., Lo M.-Ch. (eds) Handbook of Cultural Sociology. London; New York: Routledge: 97–108.

28. Parsons T. (1971) The System of Modern Societies. Moscow: Aspekt-Press. (In Russ.)

29. Steensland B. (2009) Restricted and Elaborated Modes in the Cultural Analysis of Politics. Sociological Forum. No. 4: 926–934.

30. Turner J. (1994) Analytical Theorizing. THESIS: Teoriya i istoriya jekonomicheskih i social'nyh institutov i sistem [THESIS: Theory and History of Economic and Social Institutions and Systems]. No. 4: 119–157. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up