Социологические исследованияНомер 2Модусы темпоральности в нарративах о доступности городской среды
Всего подписок: 0, всего просмотров: 937
Оценка читателей: голосов 0
1. Глазков К. П., Стрельникова А.В. Мобильные методы: движение как часть исследовательской стратегии // Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация. 2016. Том 7. № 10. С. 79-90. [Glazkov K. P., Strelnikova A. V. (2016) Mobile methods: Movement as a part of research strategy, Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 7(10): 79–90. (In Russ.)]
2. Паченков О. Публичное пространство города перед лицом вызовов современности // НЛО №117 (5). 2012. [Pachenkov O. (2012) Public urban space in front of the challenges of modernity, NLO. 117(5) (In Russ.)]. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/authors/p/pachenkov/ (accessed 14.06.2020).
3. Урри Дж. Мобильности / пер. с англ. А.В. Лазарева. М.: Праксис, 2012. [Urry J. (2012) Mobilities. Moscow: Praxis (In Russ)]
4. Ярская В.Н. (ред.) Социальный урбанизм: темпоральный контекст доступности на примере российских городов. М.: Вариант, 2020. [Yarskaya V. (2020) Social urbanism: temporal context of accessibility on the example of Russian cities. Moscow: Variant]
5. Ярская В. Н., Ярская-Смирнова Е. Р. Право на город в парадигме мобильности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2018. № 45. C. 165–173. [Yarskaya V.N., Iarskaia-Smirnova E.R. (2018) Right to the city in mobility paradigm. Tomsk University Tribune. No. 45: 165–173] DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/45/17(In Russ.)]
6. Ярская-Смирнова В.Н. О роли темпоральности в жизни людей с ограниченными возможностями // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 3. С. 42–48. [Yarskaya-Smirnova V. (2019) On the role of temporality in life of people with disabilities, Sociological Research, No. 3: 42–48 (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004277-7.
7. Bigby C., Wiesel I. (2018) Using the concept of encounter to further the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities: What has been learned? // Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 6(1): 39-51 doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2018.1528174
8. Burch S., Rembis M. (2014) Disability Histories. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
9. Goffman E. (2013) Encounters. Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books.
10. Hickman L., Serlin D. (2019) Towards a crip methodology for critical disability studies. In: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Disability: Looking Towards the Future: Volume 2. Ed.by K. Ellis, R. Garland-Thomson, M. Kent, R. Robertson. Abingtonk, New York: Routledge: 131-141.
11. Hughes B. (2019) A Historical Sociology of Disability: Human Validity and Invalidity from Antiquity to Early Modernity. London: Routledge.
12. Kafer E. (2013) Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13. Parr S., Duchan J., Pound C. (2003) Time please! Temporal barriers in aphasia. In: Aphasia inside out: Reflections on communication disability/ Ed.by S. Parr, J. Duchan, C. Pound. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press: 127–143.
14. Paterson K. (2012) It’s about time! Understanding the experience of speech impairment. In: Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, Ed.by N. Watson, S. Vehmas Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies: 165–177.
15. Priestley M. (2001) Disability and the Life Course. Cambridge University Press.
16. Soldatic K., Magee L., Robertson Sh. (2019) Temporal negotiations of social inclusion: temporality, mobility, and encounter in disabled people’s lifeworlds: Commentary on “Using the concept of encounter” (Bigby & Wiesel, 2018), Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 6(1): 52–57. doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2019.1580150
