Мodes of Temporality in the Narratives about the Accessibility of the Urban Environment

 
PIIS013216250010208-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250010208-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov
Address: Russian Federation, Saratov
Occupation: Professor, Head of International Laboratory of Social Integration Research
Affiliation: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 2
Pages92-102
Abstract

Expanding the accessibility of space and the environment is one of the central tasks of social policy and public attention, strengthening equality and justice. At first glance, such a problem is primarily revealed in spatial metaphors, such as barriers, restrictions, access, borders. However, spatial logic only partially allows us to explain the phenomena of oppression and emancipation, inclusion and exclusion. The social model allows us to map and identify the disabling contours of the spatial environment, but underestimates the patterns of oppression produced by temporal factors. The article reveals the cognitive possibilities of the temporal turn in studies of the accessibility of the urban environment for people with disabilities. The analysis is based on qualitative interviews in four Russian cities with activists from among people with disabilities. The authors consider the opinions of informants about how relations with social and physical environment evolve over the years, and what changes occur in the moments of everyday interaction. We are talking about such macrostructural characteristics of temporality as age, season, obsolescence and updating of technologies, changes of political priorities. Other modes of temporality are the changes in social attitudes, the intensity of collective actions, the transformation of the perception of accessible environment. The prospect of everyday temporality is revealed at the micro level of social interactions, in which the rhythms of urban life are violated and reconfigured, subjectivity is revealed, and acts of exclusion and inclusion occur. People with disabilities, our contemporaries and interlocutors, in their narratives, revealed the connection between moments of time and social phenomena and processes, reflected the changes occurring in themselves and the environment in the processes of their interactions.

Keywordstemporality, time, disability, activists, city, mobility, everyday life, qualitative interview, walk along interview
AcknowledgmentThe research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant № 18-18-00321.
Received24.02.2021
Publication date25.03.2021
Number of characters35321
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 982

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Глазков К. П., Стрельникова А.В. Мобильные методы: движение как часть исследовательской стратегии // Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация. 2016. Том 7. № 10. С. 79-90. [Glazkov K. P., Strelnikova A. V. (2016) Mobile methods: Movement as a part of research strategy, Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 7(10): 79–90. (In Russ.)]

2. Паченков О. Публичное пространство города перед лицом вызовов современности // НЛО №117 (5). 2012. [Pachenkov O. (2012) Public urban space in front of the challenges of modernity, NLO. 117(5) (In Russ.)]. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/authors/p/pachenkov/ (accessed 14.06.2020).

3. Урри Дж. Мобильности / пер. с англ. А.В. Лазарева. М.: Праксис, 2012. [Urry J. (2012) Mobilities. Moscow: Praxis (In Russ)]

4. Ярская В.Н. (ред.) Социальный урбанизм: темпоральный контекст доступности на примере российских городов. М.: Вариант, 2020. [Yarskaya V. (2020) Social urbanism: temporal context of accessibility on the example of Russian cities. Moscow: Variant]

5. Ярская В. Н., Ярская-Смирнова Е. Р. Право на город в парадигме мобильности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2018. № 45. C. 165–173. [Yarskaya V.N., Iarskaia-Smirnova E.R. (2018) Right to the city in mobility paradigm. Tomsk University Tribune. No. 45: 165–173] DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/45/17(In Russ.)]

6. Ярская-Смирнова В.Н. О роли темпоральности в жизни людей с ограниченными возможностями // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 3. С. 42–48. [Yarskaya-Smirnova V. (2019) On the role of temporality in life of people with disabilities, Sociological Research, No. 3: 42–48 (In Russ.)] DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004277-7.

7. Bigby C., Wiesel I. (2018) Using the concept of encounter to further the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities: What has been learned? // Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 6(1): 39-51 doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2018.1528174

8. Burch S., Rembis M. (2014) Disability Histories. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

9. Goffman E. (2013) Encounters. Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books.

10. Hickman L., Serlin D. (2019) Towards a crip methodology for critical disability studies. In: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Disability: Looking Towards the Future: Volume 2. Ed.by K. Ellis, R. Garland-Thomson, M. Kent, R. Robertson. Abingtonk, New York: Routledge: 131-141.

11. Hughes B. (2019) A Historical Sociology of Disability: Human Validity and Invalidity from Antiquity to Early Modernity. London: Routledge.

12. Kafer E. (2013) Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

13. Parr S., Duchan J., Pound C. (2003) Time please! Temporal barriers in aphasia. In: Aphasia inside out: Reflections on communication disability/ Ed.by S. Parr, J. Duchan, C. Pound. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press: 127–143.

14. Paterson K. (2012) It’s about time! Understanding the experience of speech impairment. In: Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, Ed.by N. Watson, S. Vehmas Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies: 165–177.

15. Priestley M. (2001) Disability and the Life Course. Cambridge University Press.

16. Soldatic K., Magee L., Robertson Sh. (2019) Temporal negotiations of social inclusion: temporality, mobility, and encounter in disabled people’s lifeworlds: Commentary on “Using the concept of encounter” (Bigby & Wiesel, 2018), Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 6(1): 52–57. doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2019.1580150

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up