Relationship between Parents and Adult Children: Concepts for Analysis

 
PIIS013216250009614-8-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250009614-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 12
Pages105-115
Abstract

The relevance of studying the relationship between parents and adult children is due to a number of factors that since the beginning of the new century have significantly influenced intergenerational relations around the world. These are technological, economic, political, and demographic changes. The projected decrease in the income of the working middle generation with children, deurbanization, localization, and other circumstances in connection with the global crisis may also affect the dynamics of relations between adult children and parents, which may be the subject of special analysis. Changing the models of interaction between parents and adult children can become one of the adaptive strategies in Russia, where in comparison with other countries the quality of life of people of retirement age is the worst. The article sets the task of systematization of the conceptual apparatus for studying the relationship between parents and adult children. The relevance and scientific significance of the subject area substantiated. Definitions and examples of verification of concepts care, solidarity, conflict, ambivalence and alienation are presented. When analyzing the results of empirical research using these concepts, the study of the components of solidarity is presented in greater detail. At the macro level, the relationship between adult children and parents depends on cultural traditions, level of modernization of various countries, social regime, and urban/rural areas. At the micro level, the results of foreign and Russian studies demonstrate the dependence of these relationships with gender, social class, ethnic group, marital status of children and their parents. The emphasis is placed on the feasibility of using unified indicators and indices of the presented concepts to ensure comparability of the obtained empirical results in order to analyze both short-term and long-term trends. Practical relevance of such research in Russia is linked to the need to develop social support measures and forecast the role of family vs state/private institutions in the care and support of older people.

Keywordsparents, children, grandchildren, gender, age, care, solidarity, conflict, ambivalence, alienation
Received08.05.2020
Publication date24.12.2020
Number of characters27317
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 2100

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Albertini M. (2016) Ageing and Family Solidarity in Europe: Patterns and Driving Factors of Intergenerational Support (Working Paper No. 7678). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2781299 (accessed 18.04.20).

2. Alperovich V.D. (1998) Old Age. Socio-philosophical analysis. Rostov-on-don: SKNTs VSh. (In Russ.)

3. Bengtson V.L. (2001) Beyond the Nuclear Family: The Increasing Importance of Multigenerational Bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 63(1): 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741‐3737.2001.00001.x

4. Bengtson V.L., Giarrusso R., Mabry J.B. and Silverstein M. (2002) Solidarity, Conflict, and Ambivalence: Complementary or Competing Perspectives on Intergenerational Relationships?Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 64 (3): 568–576. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00568.x

5. Blake L. (2017) Parents and Children Who Are Estranged in Adulthood: A Review and Discussion of the Literature. Journal of Family Theory & Review. No. 9 (4): 521–536. DOI:10.1111/jftr.12216

6. Birditt K.S., Miller L.M., Fingerman K.L., Lefkowitz E.S. (2009) Tensions in the Parent and Adult Child Relationship: Links to Solidarity and Ambivalence. Psychology and Aging. No. 24(2): 287–295. DOI: 10.1037/a0015196

7. Bucx F., Raaijmakers Q., Van Wel F. (2010) Life Course Stage in Young Adulthood and Intergenerational Congruence in Family Attitudes. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 72: 117–134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00687.x

8. Burgess E.W. (1926) The Family as a Unit of Interacting Personalities. Family. No. 7: 3–9.

9. Carr D., Utz R.L. (2020) Families in Later Life: A Decade in Review, Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 82 (1): 346–363. DOI:10.1111/jomf.12609

10. Clarke E.J., Preston M., Raksin J., Bengtson V.L. (1999) Types of Conflicts and Tensions between Older Parents and Adult Children.The Gerontologist. Vol. 39. No. 3: 261–270.

11. European Policy Brief (2010) KASS ‐ Family, Kinship and State in Contemporary Europe. Findings from an Interdisciplinary Research Project with an Anthropological Agenda. URL: http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/documents/1269249664_kass___family__kinship_and_state_in_contemporary_europe.pdf (accessed 10.04.20).

12. Fingerman K.L., Huo M., Birditt K.S. (2020) A Decade of Research on Intergenerational Ties: Technological, Economic, Political, and Demographic Changes. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 82 (1): 383–403. DOI: 10.1080/15427609.2012.680843

13. Fry R., Passel J.S. and Cohn D. A Majority of Young Adults in the U.S. Live With Their Parents for the First Time Since the Great Depression. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/09/04/a-majority-of-young-adults-in-the-u-s-live-with-their-parents-for-the-first-time-since-the-great-depression/ (accessed 18.09.20).

14. Furstenberg F.F. (2020) Kinship Reconsidered: Research on a Neglected Topic. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 82 (1): 364–382. DOI:10.1111/jomf.12628

15. Good W. (1963) World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: Free Press.

16. Gurko T.A. (2008) Marriage and Parenting in Russia. Moscow: IS RAN. (In Russ.)

17. Gurko T., Khromacheva A. (2015) Students-sociologist about Family, Gender, and their Attitude to Parents. Vestnik Instituta Sotziologii [Bulletin of Institute of Sociology RAS]. No. 15: 57–71. (In Russ.)

18. Gurko T.A., Orlyansky S.A., Tarchenko V.S. (2019) Students’ Behavior and Attitudes in the Private Sphere. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Social'nye nauki [Vestnik of the Lobachevsky University of Nizhny Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences]. No. 4: 67–78. (In Russ.)

19. Gurko T.A. (2020a) The Concept of Ambivalence in the Study of Family Relations. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 63–73. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250008526-1 (In Russ.)

20. Gurko T.A. (2020b) MutualAssistanceofUrbanParentsandAdultChildren: DifferencesinAge,EducationandIncomeGroups.SociologicheskajanaukaIsocial’najapraktika.Vol. 8. No 3: 134–148. DOI: 10.19181/snsp.2020.8.3.7492 (In Russ.)

21. Hazer O., Öztürk M.S., Gürsoy N. (2015) Effect of intergenerational solidarity on the satisfaction with life. International Journal of Arts & Sciences. October. No. 08 (01): 213–229.

22. Kalmijn M.(2005) Intergenerational solidarity: A review of three theories and their evidence. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6353/fdaed66c1f3e7b3f28679803fe4bbe740dc8.pdf (accessed 18.04.20).

23. Lefevre S., Prokofieva L., Korchagina I., Stankuniene V., Gedvilaite M., Badurashvili I., Sirbiladze M. (2010) The role of family and society in intergenerational solidarity: public opinion in France, Georgia, Lithuania and Russia. Evolution of the family in Europe: East-West. Under the scientific editorship of S.V. Zakharov, L.M. Prokofieva, O.V. Sinyavskaya. Independent Institute of social policy, Moscow: NISP. 353–386. (In Russ.)

24. Litwak E. (1960) Geographic Mobility and Extended Family Cohesion. American Sociological Review. No. 25: 385–394.

25. Parfenova O.A., Petukhova I.S. (2019) Competition for Care of the Elderly: Tactics of Social Services in New Conditions.Monitoring Obshchestvennogo Mneniya: Ekonomichekie i Sotsial'nye Peremeny [Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes]. No. 4: 173–186. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.4.09. (In Russ.)

26. Treas J., Gubernskaya Z. (2012) Farewell to Moms? Maternal Contact for Seven Countries in 1986 and 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 74 (2): 297–311. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00956.x

27. Rogge V.L., Eliseeva I.I., Cadibur T.S. (1976) Experience of Research of Family Group. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 1: 113–120. (In Russ.)

28. Silverstein M., Giarrusso R. (2010) Aging and Family Life: A Decade Review. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 72 (4): 1039–1058. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00749.x

29. Silverstein M., Gans D., Lowenstein A., Giarrusso R., Bengtson V.L. (2010) Older Parent–Child Relationships in Six Developed Nations: Comparisons at the Intersection of Affection and Conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family. No. 72 (4): 1006–1021. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00745.x

30. Swartz T.T. (2009) Intergenerational Family Relations in Adulthood: Patterns, Variations, and Implications in the Contemporary United States. Annual Review of Sociology. No. 35: 191–212. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134615

31. Tkach O.A. (2015) "Caring Home": Care for Elderly Relatives and Problems of Cohabitation. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological studies]. No. 10: 94–102. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up