Assistance in the field of organizational civic behavior

The paper presents an information-analytical survey of the results of Western (American) researches on rendering helping in organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Such behaviors go beyond the role instructions that individuals do on the job and are acts of altruism or helping for give support to his colleagues, which is represents aid to organization as a whole. In this article ОСВ is considered as the whole complex of different kinds of reactive and(or) proactive helping. Reactive helping is an altruistic response to a perceived need by a colleague or the organization itself. Proactive helping is motivated by needs which originate from inside the helper. New framework toward the study of helping behavior is discussed. It bases oneself on the extent to which the two helping behaviors vary in the same individual. Thus most helping generally represents a mix of reactive and proactive motives. Side by side with positive consequences of reactive and proactive helping the author further discusses more nuanced view of OCB about the “dark” side of citizenship behavior. A number of researches seeks to develop a deeper understanding of the conditions under which OCB “does more harm than good”. Although the consideration of mentioned works do not dispute the notion that OCB have many positive qualities, it is necessary to admit more balanced view of such behaviors including “dark” side of ОСВ.

Keywords

organizational citizenship behavior (ОСВ), helping behavior, reactive helping, proactive helping, social network, the “dark” side of ОСВ

Acknowledgment

The study was supported by the RFFR (Department of Humanities and Social Sciences), grant No. 17-06-00777.

Received

22.12.2018

Publication date

22.12.2018

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Sventsitsky A. Assistance in the field of organizational civic behavior // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2018. – V. 39. – № 6 C. 95-101 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920002255-6-1 (circulation date: 11.10.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920002255-6
MLA	Sventsitsky, A. "Assistance in the field of organizational civic behavior." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 39.6 (2018):95-101. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920002255-6
APA	Sventsitsky A. (2018). Assistance in the field of organizational civic behavior. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 39(6), pp.95-101 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920002255-6

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1795

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1986.

2. Blau P. Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: Wiley, 1964.

3. Bolino M. C., Klotz A. C., Turnley W. H., Harvey J. Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2013. V. 34. P. 542Ts559.

4. Bolino M. C., Turnley W. H., Niehoff B. P. The other side of the story: Reexaming prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior // Human Resource Management Review. 2004. V. 14. P. 229Ts246.

5. Cialdini R. B., Kenrick D. T. Altruism as hedonism: A social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1976. V. 34. P. 907Ts914.

6. Clary E. G., Snyder M. The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1999. V. 8. P. 156Ts159.

7. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. The UwhatF and UwhyF of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior // Psychological Inquiry. 2000. V. 11. P. 227Ts268.

8. Fineman S. On being positive: Concerns and counterpoints // Academy of Management Review. 2006. V. 31. P. 270Ts291.

9. Grant A. M. Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence performance, and productivity // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2008. V. 93. P. 48Ts58.

10. Grant A. M., Mayer D. M. Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2009. V. 94. P. 900Ts912.

11. Morrison E. W. Role definitions and organizational citizenship behaviour: The importance of the employeeTs perspective // Academy of Management Journ. 1994. V. 37. P. 1543Ts1567.

12. Morrison E. W. Doing job well: An investigation of prosocial rule-breaking // Journ. of Management. 2006. V. 32. P. 5Ts28.

13. Organ D. W. Organizational citizenship behavior: ItTs construct clean-up time // Human Performance. 1997. V. 10. P. 85Ts97.

14. Organ D. W., Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage, 2006.

15. Penner L. A., Midili A. R., Kegelmeyer J. Beyond job attitudes: A personality and social psychology perspective on the causes of organizational citizenship behavior // Human Performance. 1997. V. 10(2). P. 111Ts132.

16. Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B. An examination of the psychometric properties and nomological validity of some revised and reduced substitutes for leadership scales // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 1994. V. 79. P. 702Ts713.

17. Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B. The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research // Human Performance. 1997. V. 10. P. 133Ts151.

18. Podsakoff N. P., Whiting S. W., Podsakoff P. M., Blume B. D. Individual and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2009. V. 94. P. 122Ts141.

19. Rioux S. M., Penner L. A. The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2001. V. 86. P. 1306Ts1314.

20. Salamon S. D., Deutsch Y. OCB as a handicap: An evolutionary psychological perspective // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2006. V. 27. P. 185Ts199.

21. Sonnentag S., Grant A. M. Doing good at work feels good at home, but not right away: When and why perceived prosocial impact predicts positive affect // Personnel Psychology. 2012. V. 65. P. 495Ts530.

22. Spector P. E. Introduction: The dark and light sides of organizational citizenship behavior // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2013. V. 34. P. 540Ts541.

23. Spitzmuller M., Van Dyne L. Proactive and reactive helping: Contrasting the positive consequences of different forms of helping // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2013. V. 34. P. 560Ts580.

24. Van Dyne L., Cummings L. L., McLean Parks J. Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters) // Research in Organizational Behavior. 1995. V. 17. P. 215Ts285.

25. Van Dyne L., Ellis J. B. Job creep: A reactance theory perspective on organizational citizenship behavior as over-fulfillment of obligations / J.A.M. Coyle-Shapiro, L. M. Shore, M. S. Taylor, L. E. Tetrick (Eds.) // The employment relationship: Examing psychological and contextual perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. V. 181Ts205.

26. Vigoda-Gadot E. Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations // Journ. for the theory of Social Behavior. 2006. V. 36. P. 77Ts93.

27. Weyant J. M. Effects of mood states, costs, and benefits on helping // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology. 1978. V. 36. P. 1169Ts1176.

28. Willer R., Flynn F. J., Zak S. Structure, identity, and solidarity: A comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange // Administrative Science Quarterly. 2012. V. 57. P. 119Ts155.

29. Williams L. J., Anderson S. E. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors // Journ. of Management. 1991. V. 17(3). P. 601Ts617.