Социологические исследованияНомер 7Проблема «структура/действие» В ХХI в.: изменения в социальной реальности и выводы для исследовательской повестки
Всего подписок: 0, всего просмотров: 1743
Оценка читателей: голосов 0
1. Девятко, И. Ф. Социологические теории деятельности и практической рациональности. 2003. М.: Аванти плюс. [Deviatko I. (2003). Sociological theories of agency and practical ratioality. Moscow.: Avanti plus. (In Russ.)]
2. Иванов Д.В. К теории потоковых структур // Социологические исследования. 2012. №4. С. 8–16. [Ivanov D.V. (2012) Concerning the theory of stream structures. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Studies]. No. 4: 8–16. (In Russ.)]
3. Кравченко С.А. Усложняющиеся метаморфозы — продукт «стрелы времени» и фактор социоприродных турбулентностей // Социологические исследования. 2018. №9. С. 3–11. [Kravchenko S.A. (2018) Increasingly Complex Metamorphoses – the Product of “Arrow of Time” and Factor of Socio-Naturаl Turbulences. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 3–11. (In Russ.)]
4. Сорокин П.С. Российская социологическая традиция в международном научном дискурсе: особенности, проблемы и перспективы. Социологические исследования. 2017. №1. 117–126. [Sorokin P.S. (2017). Russian sociological tradition in the context of international discourse: specific features, problems, and perspectives. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological studies]. No. 1: 117–126. (In Russ.)]
5. Тощенко, Ж. Т. Социология жизни как концепция исследования социальной реальности. Социологические исследования. 2000. №2. 3–12. [Toschenko Z.T. (2000) Sociology of life as a concept for research in social reality. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological studies]. No. №2: 3–12. (In Russ.)]
6. Archer M. S. (2007) Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press.
7. Bloom N., Liang J., Roberts J., Ying Z. J. (2015) Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 130. No. 1: 165–218.
8. Brynjolfsson E., Rock D., Syverson C. (2017) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics. National Bureau of Economic Research.
9. Frichot H., Runting H. (2017) In captivity: The real estate of co-living. In Architecture and Feminisms. Routledge: 140–149.
10. Goffman E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Doubleday.
11. King A. (2010) The odd couple: Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British social theory. The British journal of sociology. Vol. 61: 253–260.
12. King A. (2019) Emotion, interaction and the structure-agency problem: Building on the sociology of Randall Collins. Thesis Eleven. Vol. 154. No. 1: 38–51.
13. Kuzminov Ya., Sorokin P., Froumin I. (2019) Generic and Specific Skills as Components of Human Capital: New Challenges for Education Theory and Practice. Foresight and STI Governance. Vol. 13. No. 2: 19–41.
14. Lizardo O. (2010) Beyond the antinomies of structure: Levi-Strauss, Giddens, Bourdieu, and Sewell. Theory and Society. Vol. 39. No. 6: 651–688.
15. Mayhew S. (ed.) (2004) A Dictionary of Geography (Article: Governmentality) Oxford University Press.
16. Merkel J. (2018) ‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets. Urban Studies. Vol. 56. No. 3: 526–547.
17. Meyer J. W. (2010) World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual review of sociology. Vol. 36: 1–20.
18. Mironenko I. A., Sorokin P. S. (2018) Seeking for the Definition of “Culture”: Current Concerns and their Implications. A Comment on Gustav Jahoda’s Article “Critical Reflections on some Recent Definitions of “Culture’”’. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. Vol. 52. No. 2: 331–340.
19. Schoon I., Lyons-Amos M. (2016) Diverse pathways in becoming an adult: The role of structure, agency and context. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2016. Vol. 46: 11–20.
20. Schultz T.W. (1975) The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 13. No. 3: 827–846.
21. Schultz T.W. (1978) Prize Lecture. NobelPrize.org. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1979/schultz/lecture/ (accessed 11.03.20).
22. Smelser N. (1992) Sexual differences and social rewarding. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. [Sociological studies]. No. 10: 79–88. (In Russ.)
23. Sorokin P.A. (1947) Society, Culture and Personality: A system of general sociology. New York: Harper.
24. Sorokin P. (2016) ‘Global sociology’ in different disciplinary practices: Current conditions, problems and perspectives. Current Sociology. Vol. 64. No. (1): 41–59.
25. Sorokin P. (2015) The Russian sociological tradition from the XIXth century until the present: Key features and possible value for current discussions. The American Sociologist. Vol. 46. No. (3): 341–355.
26. Sorokin P. (2017) Vision and mission of sociology: Learning from the Russian historical experience. The American Sociologist. Vol. 48. No. (2): 135–171.
27. Touraine A. (2003) Sociology without societies. Current sociology. Vol. 51. No. 2: 123–131.
28. Udehn L. (2002) The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual review of sociology. Vol. 28: 479–507.
