Post-protest Attitudes in the Armenian Society

 
PIIS013216250008494-6-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250008494-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of Department, Applied Sociology Department, Faculty of Sociology
Affiliation: Yerevan State University
Address: Armenia, Yerevan
Occupation: Assoc. Prof.
Affiliation: Southern Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 2
Pages53-62
Abstract

Results of a study conducted one year after mass protests in Armenia (‘Velvet Revolution’) of spring 2018 are presented and discussed in the article. The aim of the study is to examine public attitudes towards gains and outcomes of the power change in Armenia, towards effectiveness of new ruling elites, as well as to measure rating of prime-minister Nikol Pashinyan and level of public support for the post-revolutionary elites. One of the hypotheses is that being a protest leader, Pashinyan is still perceived separately from institutional forms of political power, so that growing gap between public trust to him personally and to political institutions and other individual representatives will continue feeding his authoritarian leadership. While personal image of Pashinyan is still based on his direct communication with public both offline and online, political institutions are criticized for the lack of political reforms directed to acute socio-economic problems; if deepened, this critics might finally question legitimacy of Pashinyan himself. Besides, although former opposition came to power with slogans of struggle against authoritarian regime of the previous elites, there is still a high risk of reproducing of the same authoritarian political culture in a new populist form.

Keywordsmass political protests, ‘Velvet Revolution’, public attitudes, trust, leadership
AcknowledgmentThe research was supported by Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. The authors thank colleagues for their support in the field studies.
Received27.02.2020
Publication date16.03.2020
Number of characters21186
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1336

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Атанесян А.В. «Бархатная революция» в Армении: потенциал, достижения и риски политикопротестной активности // Полис. Политические исследования. 2018.  № 6. С. 80–98. [Atanesyan A.V. (2018) «Velvet Revolution» in Armenia: Potential, Gains and Risks of Political Protest Activity. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Polis. Political Studies. No. 6: 80–98. (In Russ.)].

2. Атанесян А.В. Влияние социальных сетей на протестное поведение (на примере Армении) // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 3. С. 73–84. [Atanesyan A.V. (2019). The Impact of Social Networks on Protest Activities (The Case of Armenia). Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3: 73–84. (In Russ.)].

3. Наумов А.О. Роль неправительственных организаций в «цветных революциях» // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2018. № 71. С. 207–225. URL: http://e-journal.spa.msu.ru/uploads/vestnik/2018/vipusk__71._dekabr_2018_g./problemi_upravlenija_teorija_i_praktika/naumov.pdf (дата обращения 06.06.2019). [Naumov A.O. (2018). The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in Color Revolutions. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyj vestnik [Public Administration, E-Journal]. No. 71: 207-225. (In Russ.)]. (accessed 06.06.2019)].

4. Родькин П.Е. Революция потеряла цвет. «Цветные революции» 2004–2014: гуманитарный и коммуникационный феномен войны нового типа. М.: Совпадение, 2015. [Rodkin P.E. (2014) Revolution Lost its Color. «Colored Revolutions» of 2004–2014: Humanitarian and Communicative Phenomenon of a New Type War. Moscow: Sovpadenie. (In Russ.)].

5. Сундиев И.Ю., Смирнов А.А. Теория и технологии социальной деструкции (на примере «цветных революций»). М.: Русск. биогр. ин-т, Ин-т эконом. страт., 2016. [Sundiev I.Y., Smirnov A.A. (2016) Theory and Technology of Social Destruction. Moscow: Russk. boigr. in-t, In-t ekon. strat. (In Russ.)].

6. Giragosian R. (2019). Paradox of Power: Russia, Armenia and the Europe after the Velvet Revolution. European Council on Foreign Relations. August. URL: https://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/russia_armenia_and_europe_after_the_velvet_revolution.pdf (accessed 04.09.2019).

7. Shirinyan A. (2019). Armenia’s Foreign Policy Balancing in an Age of Uncertainty. Research Paper. Chatham House, Russia and Eurasia Programme, March. URL: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2019-03-14-Armenia3.pdf (accessed 04.09.2019).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up