A Radical Contester: Sociology of Russian Scholarship through the Prism of a Deviant Case

 
PIIS013216250005899-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013216250005799-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Leading Researcher; Full Professor
Affiliation:
Central Economic Mathematical Institute RAS
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Address: Canada, Newfoundland
Journal nameSotsiologicheskie issledovaniya
EditionIssue 7
Pages125-136
Abstract

The article discusses academic freedom in the Russian institutional context. The establishment of some distance to what a scholar is studying and his/her ability to change the research methodology depending on particular circumstances are considered as elements of academic freedom. A case study of the scholarly career of Professor Viktor Makarenko informs the analysis. This case is deemed to be extreme/deviant.

Keywordsacademic freedom, Russian power, Russian world, scientific communication, content analysis
Received16.07.2019
Publication date16.07.2019
Number of characters29393
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1462

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Berlin I. (1969) Two Concepts of Liberty, In: Berlin I. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 118-172.

2. Boltanski L., Thévenot L. (1991) De la justification: les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard.

3. Brubaker R. (1996) Nationalism reframed: nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Bryman A., Bell E., Teevan J.J. (2012) Social Research Methods. 3rd Canadian edition. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.

5. Dean M. (2009) Three conceptions of the relationship between power and liberty. In: Clegg S.R., Haugaard M. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Power. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE: 177–193.

6. Flyvbjerg B. (2006) Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry. No. 12(2): 219–245.

7. Foucault M. (2011) The Courage of Truth (The Government of Self and Others II). Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983–1984. Transl. by G. Burchell. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

8. Makarenko V.P. (1987) Bureaucracy and the State: Lenin’s analysis of the bureaucracy in tsarist Russia. Rostov-on-Don: RGU. (In Russ.)

9. Makarenko V.P. (1989) Bureaucracy and Stalinism. Rostov-on-Don: RGU. (In Russ.)

10. Makarenko V.P. (2002) Analytical political philosophy: Essays in political conceptology. Moscow: Praksis. (In Russ.)

11. Makarenko V.P. (2005) Political conceptology: An overview of research agenda. Moscow: Praksis. (In Russ.)

12. Makarenko V.P. (1998) Russian Power: theoretical and sociological aspects. Rostov-on-Don: Sev.-Kav. nauchn. tsentra vyssh. shk. (In Russ.)

13. Makarenko V.P. (2009) Scientific and everyday knowledge – intellectual modes? Politicheskaya kontseptologiya [Political conceptology]. No. 2: 5–028. (In Russ.)

14. Makarenko V.P. (2011) Scientific counter-revolution: ideas of M. Petrov as a source of inspiration. Rostov-on-Don: Rostizdat. (In Russ.)

15. Makarenko V.P. (2018) Violence and political bureaucracy. Rostov: YUFU. (In Russ.)

16. Merton R.K. (1973) Multiple discoveries as Strategic Research Site. In: Merton R.K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago and London: the University of Chicago Press: 371–382.

17. Oleinik A. (2011) Market as a Weapon: The socio-economic machinery of dominance in Russia. London: Routledge.

18. Oleinik A.N. (2019) Scientific Transactions: Networks and hierarchies in the social sciences. Moscow: Infra-M. (In Russ.)

19. Pivovarov Yu.S. (2006) Russian political tradition today. Moscow: INION. (In Russ.)

20. Pivovarov Yu.S., Fursov А.I. (1998) Inheritance of power and Russian power. Politiya – Vestnik ROPTS [Politia]. No. 1 (Spring). (In Russ.)

21. Rubtsov A.V. (2018) Civilizational choice in the post-Soviet context. Politicheskaya kontseptologiya [Political conceptology]. No 3: 17–32. (In Russ.)

22. Schuetz A. (1944) The Stranger: An Essay in Social Psychology. American Journal of Sociology. No. 49(6): 499–507.

23. Shalak V.I. (2004) Content-analysis. Moscow: Omega-L. (In Russ.)

24. Shchedrovitsky P.G. (2000) Russian world and the trans-national Russian. Russian Journal. http://old.russ.ru/politics/meta/20000302_schedr.html (accessed 11.03.2019). (In Russ.)

25. Sloterdijk P. (2009) Critique of Cynical Reason. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)

26. Sulyak S.G. (2012) Moldova and Russian world. Rusin [Rusin]. No. 3(29): 5–32. (In Russ.)

27. Suslov M. (2012) Geographical Metanarratives in Russia and the European East: Contemporary Pan-Slavism. Eurasian Geography and Economics. No. 53(5): 575–595.

28. Tishkov V.A. (2013) Russian people: history and meaning of the national self-consciousness. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

29. Тuskov А.А., Нikolaenko А.А. (2016) Concept of ‘Russian power’. Vladivostok: DVFU. (In Russ.)

30. Weber M. (1968) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Ed. by Guenther R. and Wittich C. New York: Bedminster Press.

31. Zhirinovksy V.V. (2007) Russian power: An address to citizens of Russia. Moscow: LDPR. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up