Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1415
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Blagojević S. Akademski diskurs pod lupom kontrastivne analize // Lingvističke analize. Zbornik u čast 25 godina Instituta za strane jezike u Podgorici. Podgorica: Institut za strane jezike, 2004. S. 97–109. [Blagojević S. (2004) My Zodiac Sign Is Virgo. Academic discourse under lupus contrast analysis. In: Language Analysis. Proceedings in Honor of the 25-year-old Institute of Foreign Languages in Podgorica. Podgorica: Institute of foreign languages: 97-109. (In Croat.)]
2. Blagojević S. Autorovo ograđivanje kao retorička strategija u akademskom diskursu: kontrastivna analiza // Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakultata. Novi Sad, 2007. 37. S. 125–133. [Blagojević S. (2007) Author's fence as a rhetorical strategy in Academic discourse: contrast analysis. In: Proceedings of the Faculty of Philosophy. 37. Novi Sad: 125–133. (In Croat.)]
3. Blagojević S. „Mi” kao „mi” ili „mi” kao „ja”: prvo lice množine kao eksponent autorovo prisustva u akademskom pisanom diskursu // Zbornik matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku. Novi Sad. 2011. 54/2. S. 207–218. [Blagojević S. (2011) "We" as " we " or " we " as "I": the first person plural as an Exhibitor of the author's presence in Academic written discourse. In: Proceedings of Serbian Philology and linguistics. 54/2. Novi Sad: 207–218. (In Croat.)]
4. Blagojević S. Diskursna refleksivnost u akademskim tekstovima – kontrastivni pristup // Leksika, gramatika, diskurs. Zbornik u čast Veri Vasić. Novi Sad. 2014. S. 439–457. [Blagojević S. (2014) Discourse reflexivity in academic texts-contrast approach. In: Vocabulary, Grammar, Discourse. Choir in honor of Vera Vasich. Novi Sad: 439–457. (In Croat.)]
5. Fuko M. Reči i stvari. Beograd: Nolit, 1971. [Fuko M. (1971) Words and Things. Belgrade: Nolit. (In. Serb.)]
6. Katnić-Bakaršić M. Između diskursa moći i moći diskursa. Zagreb: Naklada Zoro, 2012. [Katnić-Bakaršić M. (2012) Between the Discourse of Power and the Power of Discourse. Zagreb: Naklada Zoro. (In Croat.)]
7. Klikovac D. O naučnom funkcionalnom stilu // Književnost i jezik. Beograd. 2004. 51/1–2: 23–38. [Klikovac D. (2004) About scientific functional style. Literature and Language. 51/1–2: 23–38. (In. Serb.)]
8. Ristić D. Značenja delanja: sociološka analiza diskurzivnih praksi ideologije. Doktorska disertacija. Novi Sad, 2015. [Ristić D. (2015) Division Values: a Sociological Analysis of the Discursive Practices of Ideology. Doctoral thesis. Novi Sad. (n Croat.)]
9. Crismore A., Farnsworth R. (1990) Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In: Nash, W. (eds). The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE: 118‒136.
10. Keller R. (2013) Doing Discourse Research: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London: Sage Publications.
11. Lyons J. (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Mauranen A. (1993) Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Text-Linguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
13. Toumi N. (2009) A model for the investigation of reflexive metadiscourse in research articles. Language Studies Working Papers. University of Reading. 1: 64 73.