Number Marking of the Verb in the East Caucasian Languages

 
PIIS160578800023671-4-1
DOI10.31857/S160578800023671-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: HSE University
Address: 20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow, 101000, Russia
Journal nameIzvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka
EditionVolume 81 Issue 6
Pages102-114
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a review of dedicated number marking on verbs in the East Caucasian languages. The review is based on the data drawn from grammatical descriptions. First of all, possible ways to analyze number marking on verbs are discussed: 1) as agreement, i.e. as an operation by which morphological features are copied from one word form onto another, 2) as a special category of verbal number. Second, the article discusses the ways in which number is marked on verbs and the factors by which this marking is conditioned. As it turns out, the Nakh and the Avar-Ando-Tsez branches feature number marking strategies, which are limited to a lexically defined set of verbs. Number markers in this case are localized in the verb stem. On the other hand, in many branches of the family, a different situation is also common: number marking is conditioned by the TAM-forms of the verb, i.e. by grammatical factors. Third, the diachrony of number marking is considered. The article proposes that the verb forms which are marked for number often go back to copular constructions where the predicate position is occupied by a participial form. As a result of grammaticalization of these constructions into verbal forms, the original nominal number marking on the participle develops into verbal number marking.

KeywordsEast Caucasian languages, Nakh-Dagestan languages, verb, number agreement, verbal number, intragenetic typology
AcknowledgmentAcknowledgements. The support from the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics is gratefully acknowledged. The author also thanks N.R. Dobrushina for valuable remarks and comments on the draft version of the text.
Received19.12.2022
Publication date19.12.2022
Number of characters32304
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 212

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Hammarström, H., Forkel, R., Haspelmath, M., Bank, S. Glottolog 4.4. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.5281/ Zenodo.4761960. (available online at http://glottolog.org, accessed on 2022.10.29.).

2. Forker, D. Gender agreement is different. Linguistics. 2018, Vol. 56 (4), pp. 865–894.

3. Kibrik, A.E., Seleznev, M.G. Sintaksis i morfologiya glagolnogo soglasovaniya v tabasaranskom yazyke [Syntax and Morphology of Verbal Agreement in Tabasaran]. A.E. Kibrik (red.). Tabasaranskie etyudy [Studies in Tabasaran]. Moscow, 1982, pp. 17–33. (In Russ.)

4. Helmbrecht, J. The syntax of personal agreement in East Caucasian languages. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung. 1996, Vol. 49 (2), pp. 127–148.

5. Sumbatova, N. Person hierarchies and the problem of person marker origin in Dargwa: facts and diachronic problems. Authier G., Maisak T. (eds.). Tense, aspect, modality and finiteness in East Caucasian languages. Bochum: Diversitas linguarum, 2011, pp. 313–160.

6. Kibrik, A.Je. Direct-oblique agreement of attributes in Daghestanian. Plank F. (ed.) Double case: agreement by Suffixaufnahme. Oxford, 1995, pp. 216–229.

7. Daniel, M.A. Soglasovanie po kosvennosti v nakhsko-dagestanskikh yazykakh: obzor empiricheskih dannykh [Agreement in Obliqueness in East Caucasian: A Formal Survey]. Rhema. 2021, No. 2, pp. 102–130. (In Russ.)

8. Alekseev, M.E. Sravnitel'no-istoricheskaya morfologiya avaro-andijskikh yazykov [Comparative morphology of the Avar-Andic languages]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. (In Russ.)

9. Bond, O., Corbett, G.G., Chumakina, M., Brown, D. Archi: Complexities of agreement in cross-theoretical perspective. Oxford University Press, 2016.

10. Ganenkov, D.S., Majsak, T.A. Padezh, soglasovanie i argumentnaya struktura v nakhsko-dagestanskikh yazykakh [Case, Agreement and Argument Structure in the East Caucasian Languages]. Acta linguistica petropolitana. Trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovanij RAN [Acta linguistica petropolitana. Proceedings of the Institute for Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2017, Vol. 13, Part. 1. (In Russ.)

11. Tatevosov, S.G. Chasti rechi. Kategoriya klassa [Parts of Speech. The Category of Noun Class]. Kibrik, A.E., Tatevosov, S.G., Lyutikova, E.A., Kazenin, K.I (eds.). Bagvalinskij yazyk: Grammatika. Teksty. Slovari [Bagvalin Language: Grammar. Texts. Dictionaries]. Moscow, Nasledie Publ., 2001. (In Russ.)

12. Sumbatova, N.R. Lichnaya ierarkhiya i lichnoe soglasovanie v yazykakh nakhsko-dagestanskoj semji [Person Hierarchy and Person Agreement in the East Caucasian Languages]. Lander, Yu.A., Sumbatova, N.R. Darginskij govor seleniya Tanty: grammaticheskij ocherk, voprosy sintaksisa [Tanty Dargwa: a Grammar Sketch, Issues in Syntax]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoj kultury Publ., 2015, pp. 540–565. (In Russ.)

13. Durie, M. The Grammaticization of Number as a Verbal Category. Proceedings of the Twelth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1986, pp. 355–368. doi:10.3765/bls.v12i0.1876.

14. Corbett, G.G. Number. Cambridge: 2000.

15. Mattiola, S. Typology of pluractional constructions in the languages of the world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2019.

16. Mattiola, S. Pluractionality: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass. Vol. 14(3), doi:10.1111/lnc3.12366. 2020.

17. Shluinsky, A.B. K tipologii predikatnoj mnozhestvennosti: organizaciya semanticheskoj zony [Towards a Typology of Predicative Plurality: the Structure of the Semantic Zone]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Topics in the Study of Language]. 2006, No. 1, pp. 46–75. (In Russ.)

18. Mithun, M. Lexical categories and the evolution of number marking. Hammond, M., Noonan, M. (eds.). Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics. New York: Academic Press, 1988, pp. 211–234.

19. Applegate, R.B. Ineseño Chumash Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 1972.

20. Frajzyngier, Z. Ergativity, number, and agreement. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1985. Vol. 11, pp P. 96–106.

21. Mithun, M. The languages of native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

22. Veselinova, L. Suppletion in verb paradigms (Typological Studies in Language, Vol. 67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.

23. Acquaviva, P., Daniel, M. (eds.). Number in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Walter de Gruyter GmbH: Berlin, Boston, 2022.

24. Dobrushina, N. Moods in Mehweb. Daniel et al. (eds.) The Mehweb language: Essays on phonology, morphology and syntax. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2019, pp. 117–165.

25. Koryakov, Yu.B. Darginskie yazyki i ikh klassifikaciya [The Dargwa Languages and Their Classification]. T.A. Majsak et al. (eds.). Durkhsi khazna. 2021, pp. 139–154. (In Russ.)

26. Magomedbekova, Z.M. Karatinskij yazyk: grammaticheskij analiz, teksty, slovar [The Karata Language: Grammar Analysis, Texts, Dictionary]. Tbilisi, 1971. (In Russ.)

27. Corbett, G.G. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

28. Salimov, H.S. Gagatlinskij govor andijskogo yazyka [The Gagatli Dialect of Andi]. Makhachkala, 2010. (In Russ.)

29. Yakovlev, N.F. Morfologiya chechenskogo yazyka [The Morphology of Chechen]. Grozny, 1960. (In Russ.)

30. Nichols, J. Ingush grammar. Berkeley, 2011.

31. Desheriev, Yu.D. Bacbijskij yazyk: fonetika, morfologiya, sintaksis, leksika [The Batsbi Language: Phonetics, Morphology, Syntax, Vocabulary]. Leningrad, 1953. (In Russ.)

32. Berg van den, H. A grammar of Hunzib. München, 1995.

33. Komri, B., Khalilov, M.Sh., Khalilova, Z.M. Grammatika bezhtinskogo yazyka: Fonetika. Morfologiya. Slovoobrazovanie [The Grammar of Bezhta: Phonetics, Morphology, Word Formation]. Leipzig – Makhachkala, 2015. (In Russ.)

34. Magometov, A.A. Agulskij yazyk (Issledovanie i teksty) [The Agul Language: a Study and Texts]. Tbilisi, 1970. (In Russ.)

35. Zakirova, A.N. Soglasovanie po chislu v andijskom yazyke: ekspansiya iz paradigmy sushchestvitelnykh [Number Agreement in Andi: Expansion from the Nominal Paradigm]. Rodnoj yazyk [Mother Language]. 2020, No. 2, pp. 94–123. (In Russ.)

36. Zakirova, A.N. Soglasovanie prilagatelnykh po chislu v andijskikh dialektakh: glagol [Number Agreement of Adjectives in Dialects of Andi: the Verb]. T.A. Majsak, N.R. Sumbatova, Ya.G. Testelec (eds.). Durkhsi khazna. Sbornik statej k 60-letiyu R.O. Mutalova [Durkhasi hazna. Collection of Articles for the 60th Anniversary of R.O. Mutalov]. Moscow, Buki Vedi Publ., 2021. S. 94–114. (In Russ.)

37. Magometov, A.A. Tabasaranskij yazyk: (Issledovanie i teksty) [Tabasaran: a Study and Texts]. Tbilisi, 1965. (In Russ.)

38. Givón, T. Syntax: an introduction (Vol. 1). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.

39. Lehmann, Ch. Universal and Typological Aspects of Agreement. Seiler, H., Stachowiak, F.J. (eds.). Apprehension, Vol. 2, Narr, Tübingen, 1982, pp. 201–267.

40. Fuß, E. The rise of agreement: A formal approach to the syntax and grammaticalization of verbal inflection (Vol. 81). John Benjamins Publishing, 2005.

41. Kuteva, T., Heine, B., Hong, B., Long, H., Narrog, H., Rhee, S. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

42. Creissels, D. Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung. 2008, No. 61 (4), pp. 309–325.

43. Lomtadze, E.A. Mravlobitis c'armoeba k'ap'uč'ur-hunzuri enis zmnaši [The Formation of Plural in the Hunzib Verb]. Iberijsko-kavkazskoe yazykoznanie [Iberian-Caucasian Linguistics]. 1953, Vol. V, pp. 417–446. (In Georgian)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up