The Identity Problem of Internees During the Collapse of the Russian Empire

 
PIIS0869544X0027862-1-1
DOI10.31857/S0869544X0027862-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: , Moscow, Russian Federation
Journal nameSlavianovedenie
EditionIssue 5
Pages20-28
Abstract

The article deals with the self-identification of civilian prisoners, former subjects of the Russian Empire. On March 3, 1918, the Brest–Litovsk Peace Treaty between the Soviet Russia and the Central Powers was signed. By that time, about 1.5 million prisoners of war and 50 thousand internees were on the territory of the German Empire, who had to be returned to their homeland. This issue was dealt with by the Bureau of Prisoners of War and Internees. The State Archive of the Russian Federation (GA RF) contains materials from the Consulate of the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic (RSFSR) in Berlin, which describe the peculiarities of the interaction between ethnic and civil identification of internees and refugees. Among the refugees there were persons with German passports, which indicated that their owners were Russians, Poles, Lithuanians, Estonians, but they all «want to return to Russia». It was perfectly acceptable for internees from the occupied regions to declare their desire to return to Russia, which was not applied to prisoners of war. Another aspect of the problem is the process of separation, which began in April 1918, which divided the internees into the category of persons from the soviet territories and another category from the occupied territories. This process was driven not systematically, but rather chaotically. The main criterion for separation was the place of birth, but the striving to extract themselves from the gripe of captivity forced the denying the internees’ ethnicity, because then they could leave the camp faster. It seems that it is quite correct to speak about situational citizenship in the context of the collapse of the empire and the post–war settlement. Political reality was the factor that forced certain groups of internees, for example, students, to be apathetic. Therefore, representatives of the Russian consulate were seriously concerned about the delivery of propaganda literature to the camps in an attempt not to lose the former subjects of the Russian Empire and to make from them the Soviet citizens.

 

Keywordsinternment, repatriation, citizenship, ethnicity, situational identity.
Received02.10.2023
Publication date10.04.2024
Number of characters17572
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 50

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Assmann A. Die Wiedererfindung der Nation. Warum wir sie fürchten und warum wir brauchen. München, C.H. Beck Publ., 2020, 334 p.

2. Delpal B. Zwischen Vergeltung und Humanisierung der Lebensverhältnisse Kriegsgefangene in Frankreich 1914–1920. Kriegsgefangene im Europa des Ersten Weltkriegs, Leiden, Brill; Schöningh, 2006, pp. 147–164.

3. Ippolitov S.S. «Ukraintsy kategoricheski zayavili, chto oni russkiye»: voyennoplennyye Pervoy mirovoy voyny v yevropeyskoy politike 1918–1921 gg.». Uchenyye zapiski Krymskogo federal'nogo universiteta imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Seriya «Istoricheskiye nauki», 2019, vol. 5 (71), no. 3, pp. 68–79. (In Russ.)

4. Ippolitov S.S. Russkiye voyennoplennyye Pervoy mirovoy voyny kak gumanitarnaya problema. Izvestiya Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, no. 2 (50), pp. 174–188. (In Russ.)

5. Lannik L. V. Restrukturirovaniye postimperskikh prostranstv: uroki i posledstviya opyta 1918 goda. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn', 2021, no. 3, pp.144–151. (In Russ.)

6. Lazarenko Ye.I. Diplomaticheskaya deyatel'nost' Sovetskoy delegatsii v Moskve i Berline po obmenu voyennoplennykh Pervoy mirovoy voyny v 1918 g. Kul'turnyy landshaft regionov, 2021, no. 1, pp. 8–21. (In Russ.)

7. Lazarenko Ye.I. Dokladnyye zapiski attashe po delam voyennoplennykh pri posol'stve RSFSR v Berline S.M. Semkova kak istoricheskiy istochnik. Vestnik gumanitarnogo obrazovaniya, 2022, no 1 (125), pp. 95–101. (In Russ.)

8. Nagornaya O.S. «Drugoy voyennyy opyt». Rossiyskiye voyennoplennyye Pervoy mirovoy voyny v Germanii (1914–1922). Moscow, Novyy khronograf Publ., 2010, 440 p. (In Russ.)

9. Nagornaya O.S. Gumanitarnyye ustremleniya na pepelishche velikoy voyny, transnatsional'nyye izmereniya opyta repatriatsii voyennoplennykh. Dialog so vremenem. Al'manakh intellektual'noy istorii, 2014, vol. 48, pp. 7–15. (In Russ.)

10. Riker P. Ya – sam kak drugoy. Moscow, Humanitarina literature Publ., 2008, 416 p. (In Russ.)

11. Rostislavleva N.V. «Byl vse eti gody nezabyvayemyye gody grazhdanskim plennym № 52»: o statuse russkikh v Germanii v gody Pervoy mirovoy voyny. Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik, 2020, no. 3 (65), pp. 79–97. (In Russ.)

12. Shatokhina-Mordvintseva G.A. Internirovannyye voyennosluzhashchiye i bel'giyskiye bezhentsy v neytral'nykh Niderlandakh v gody pervoy mirovoy voyny. Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya, 2018, no. 1, pp. 204–220. (In Russ.)

13. Stibbe M. Civilian Internment during the First World War: A European and Global History, 1914 – 1920. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 314 p.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up