Cohabitation of men and women: problems of institutionalization in the context of traditional values

The article discusses the features of legal regulation of the participation of cohabitants in civil, family and housing relations, analyzes the advantages of cohabitation in comparison with traditional marriage, as well as the disadvantages of this form of family relations.

The question of the possibility of institutionalization of cohabitation in the Russian legislation is investigated. It is argued that it is inadmissible both to legally equate extramarital cohabitation with a registered marriage, and to extend to cohabitants new, additional to existing, legal guarantees, as it contradicts traditional family values and public opinion of the majority of the population of Russia.

In order to protect the property rights of a child born to persons who are not married, the necessity of introducing into the family and civil law as an independent institution of the third type of common property (along with common joint and common shared property) – common united property. Proposals are made for the legal regulation of the peculiarities of ownership, use and disposal of property in common united property.

Keywords

marriage, family, traditional values, family values, registration of marriage, konkubinat, registered partnership, shared property, shared ownership property

Received

06.12.2019

Publication date

23.12.2019

Number of characters

31498

Cite

GOST	Yakushev P. Cohabitation of men and women: problems of institutionalization in the context of traditional values // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2019. – Issue 12 C. 104-112 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S013207690007823-7-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690007823-7
MLA	Yakushev, Pavel "Cohabitation of men and women: problems of institutionalization in the context of traditional values." Gosudarstvo i pravo 12 (2019):104-112. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690007823-7
APA	Yakushev P. (2019). Cohabitation of men and women: problems of institutionalization in the context of traditional values. Gosudarstvo i pravo (12), pp.104-112 DOI: 10.31857/S013207690007823-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1154

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Albikov R.I. General provisions the legal regulation of joint property of spouses // Family and Housing Law. 2012. No. 3. P. 3 (in Russ.).

2. Alyautdinov S. The family and Islam. SPb., 2011. P. 225 (in Russ.).

3. Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. Musnad [hadith book]. Riyadh: al-afqar al-dawliya, 2002. P. 1125 (in Russ.).

4. Vartanyan M.O. Actual relations in decisions of the European court of human rights and Russian judicial practice // Family and Housing Law. 2017. No. 2. P. 3 - 5 (in Russ.).

5. Ganaga V.V. Marriage (partnership) as a means of budgetary savings in the welfare state: the German experience // Bulletin of the Institute of Volga region management. 2014. No. 2 (41). P. 33 - 40 (in Russ.).

6. Demographic Yearbook of Russia. 2017: statistical compendium. M., 2017. P. 68 - 71 (in Russ.).

7. Samokhina T. In the state Duma criticized the idea to equate cohabitation to marriage // Ross. gas. 2018. 22 Jan. (in Russ.)

8. Isupova O.G. Russian consensual unions of the beginning of the XXI century (according to the international comparative study) // Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes. 2015. No. 2 (126). P. 153 - 164 (in Russ.).

9. Kovaleva A.V. Civil marriage as a destabilizer of the family institution // Power and management in the East of Russia. 2009. No. 1 (46). P. 148 (in Russ.).

10. Lavrov Yu. N. Property legal relations of spouses in Russia: dis. ... PhD in Law. SPb., 2002. Pp 61 (in Russ.).

11. Laletina A.C. Comparative legal study of contractual regulation of property relations of spouses in the law of the Russian Federation and France: dis. ... PhD in Law. M., 2004. P. 4 (in Russ.).

12. Lawson T., Garrod J. Sociology. A - Z Dictionary-reference. M., 2000. P. 36, 37 (in Russ.).

13. Nechaeva A.M. Family Law: actual problems of theory and practice. M., 2007. P. 87 (in Russ.).

14. About results of the All-Russian census of the population of 2010 the Message of Rosstat // Demoscope. Weekly. 2011. 19 - 31 Dec. (No. 491 - 492) (in Russ.).

15. The foundations of the social concept of the Russian Orthodox Church. Sect. X. Questions of personal, Family and public morality // Official website of the Russian Orthodox Church. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/419128.html (accessed: 20.08.2018) (in Russ.).

16. Panin V.C. Actual marriage relations: problems of theory, legislation and practice: dis. ... PhD in Law. M., 2013. P. 3 (in Russ.).

17. Savelyev D.B. Agreements in the family sphere: Textbook. M., 2018. P. 53 (in Russ.).

18. Tarusina N.N. Family Law: in the "orchestration" of sovereignty and judicial discretion. M., 2014. P. 112, 113 (in Russ.).

19. Chursina V.N. Civil marriage as a manifestation of the crisis of family and marriage relations // Risks in the changing social reality: the problem of forecasting and management: materials of international studies. scientific-practical Conf., Belgorod, 19 - 20 November 2015. Belgorod, 2015. P. 692, 693 (in Russ.).

20. Demographic statistics: a review of definitions and methods of data collection in 44 European countries / A. Albano, V. Corsini, A. Gereffi. European Union. Luxembourg, 2015. P. 62, 63 (in Russ.).