The use of substantivised participles in the Old Church Slavonic language

In the article, the use of substantivized participles in Old Church Slavonic translations is investigated in comparison with the use of participles in Greek originals. The author claims that the only criterion in determining the substantivization/absence of substantivization of the participial forms in the text is their fulfillment of the function of the naming of linguistic concepts. From this point of view, the Greek and Old Church Slavonic material is analyzed and various types of nominations by substantival participles are considered. Attention is paid not only to single-word nominations in the shape of participial forms but also to multi-word nominations with participial forms.

Keywords

Old Church Slavonic, Greek originals, substantival participles, multi-word nominations.

Received

12.08.2020

Publication date

12.08.2020

Number of characters

32304

Cite

GOST	Efimova V. The use of substantivised participles in the Old Church Slavonic language // Slavianovedenie – 2020. – Issue 4 C. 88-99 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://slav.jes.su/S0869544X0010422-7-1 (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S0869544X0010422-7
MLA	Efimova, Valeriya "The use of substantivised participles in the Old Church Slavonic language." Slavianovedenie 4 (2020):88-99. DOI: 10.31857/S0869544X0010422-7
APA	Efimova V. (2020). The use of substantivised participles in the Old Church Slavonic language. Slavianovedenie (4), pp.88-99 DOI: 10.31857/S0869544X0010422-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 823

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Večerka R. Syntax aktivních participií v staroslověnštině. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství, 1961.

2. SHCHajnke K. Nablyudeniya nad upotrebata na starob"lgarskite prichastiya // Palaeobulgarica. 1984. God. 8. № 2. S. 78–85.

3. Robinson M.A., Pierpont W.G. The New Testament in the original Greek: Byzantine Texform. Southborough, Mass., 2005.

4. Septuaginta / Ed. A. Rahlfs. Ed. 5. London, 1952. Vol. I–II.

5. Zaimov J, Kapaldo M. Supras"lski ili Retkov sbornik. Sofiya, 1982–1983. T. 1–2.

6. Patrologiae sursus completus. Series graeca / Ed. Migne J.-P. Paris, 1864. T. LXXXI.

7. Boyer J.L. The Classification of Participles: A Statistical Study // Grace Theological Journal. 1984. Vol. 5. N 2. P. 163–179.

8. Blass F., Debrunner A. A Greek grammar of the New Testament and other early Christian literature. Cambridge; Chicago: University Press, 1961.

9. Wallace D.B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basic: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Michigan: Zondervan Pablishing House, 1996.

10. Efimova V.S., ZHelyazkova V. Neskol'koslovnye naimenovaniya lic v drevnejshih slavyanskih rukopisyah // Palaeobulgarica. 2014. God. 38. № 3. S. 33–48.

11. Efimova V.S. K opredeleniyu statusa neskol'koslovnyh naimenovanij lic v staroslavyanskih tekstah // Slavyanskij al'manah. 2015. № 3–4. M., 2015. S. 352–367.

12. Vereshchagin E.M., Kostomarov V.G. YAzyk i kul'tura. Tri lingvostranovedcheskie koncepcii: leksicheskogo fona, reche-povedencheskih taktik i sapientemy. M., 2005.

13. Efimova V.S. K probleme vyyavleniya faktorov, vliyavshih na vybor sposoba nominacii v drevnejshih slavyanskih perevodah // Slavyanskoe i balkanskoe yazykoznanie. Paleoslavistika: Slovo i tekst. M., 2012. S. 139–151.

14. Hodova K.I. Upotreblenie padezhej pri sintaksicheskih proizvodnyh glagola v staroslavyanskom yazyke // Problemy indoevropejskogo yazykoznaniya. M., 1964. S. 122–160.

15. Karcevski S. Du dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique // Karcevski S. Inédits et introuvables. Paris: Peeters, 2000. P. 3–8.

16. Booij G. Phrasal names: A constructionist analysis // Special issue on Words and Phrases. Word Structure. 2009. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 219–240.

17. Bally Ch. Traité de stylistique française. 2 e ed. Heidelberg, 1921.

18. Kubryakova E.S. O raznostrukturnyh edinicah nominacii i meste proizvodnogo slova sredi etih edinic // Słowotwórstwo a inne sposoby nominacji. Katowice, 2000. S. 24–31.