Dialect Representation in the Elderly Native Speakers’ Mind on the Territory of the Ilmen Lake District

 
PIIS013161170026399-7-1
DOI10.31857/S013161170026399-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Yaroslav the Wise Novgorod State University
Address: Russia, Velikiy Novgorod
Journal nameRusskaya Rech’
EditionIssue 4
Pages40-50
Abstract

Abstract: The article focuses on the reception of the dialect by its native speakers, namely representatives of the older generation living on the territory of the Ilmen Lake district. Despite the fact that the introduction and imposition of standard Russian language as the only correct and legitimate version through the education system and public institutions could not completely eradicate the local dialect, it did not contribute to its prestige and positive representation in the minds of native speakers. The examples from the interviews with local residents prove that they evaluate their own dialect in axiological categories in relation to the ideal norm – codified Russian. It appears that the native speakers have contradictory opinions regarding their dialect as a reaction to the situation of unbalanced diglossia. In addition, the article analyzes factors contributing to the displacement of regional dialects on the territory of the Ilmen Lake district. The examples of the representatives’ discourse help to describe current linguistic situation in the Lake district villages, the main characteristic of which is that linguistic competences of the representatives vary.

Keywordsdialect representation in the native speaker’s mind, prestige of the language, diglossia, norm, language discrimination
Received04.10.2023
Publication date04.10.2023
Number of characters17203
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 150

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bourdieu P. Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris, Fayard, 1982, pp. 23–58.

2. Boyer H. Matériaux pour une approche des représentations sociolinguistiques. Eléments de définition et parcours documentaire en diglossie. Langue française, 1990, no. 85, pp. 102–124. (In French)

3. Dorian N. The Problem of the Semi-Speaker in Language Death. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1977 (12), pp. 23–32. (In Engl.)

4. Dubrovin S. [Posers in Novgorod (Ethnographic sketch)]. Otechestvennye zapiski, St. Petersburg, 1871, no. 7, pp. 195–220. (In Russ.)

5. Grinevald C., Bert M. Speakers and Communities. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Сambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 45–65. (In Engl.)

6. Kasatkin L. L. [Russian dialects in the light of language policy]. Russkaya dialektologiya [Russian dialectology]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2005, pp. 12–16. (In Russ.)

7. Man'kov A. E. [The dialect of the village of Staroshvedskoe: the problem of structural changes in an endangered language]. Yazykovaya politika i yazykovyye konflikty v sovremennom mire: Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya (Moskva, 16–19 sentyabrya 2014) [Language policy and language conflicts in the modern world: International conference (Moscow, September 16–19, 2014)]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics RAS, Research Center for National and Linguistic Relations, 2014, pp. 463–473. (In Russ.)

8. Vio A., Moskvicheva S. A. [Problem of language representation in native speaker’s mind in context of language border zone: stadying need in Karelian language]. Vestnik RUDN, seriya Psikhologiya i pedagogika, 2013, no. 1, pp. 92–97. (In Russ.)

9. Zakharova K. F., Orlova V. G. Dialektnoye chleneniye russkogo yazyka [Dialectal division of the Russian language]. Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004. 176 p.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up