On the Typology of  Orthographic Variance  in the Russian Language

Variance as a phenomenon of writing is an insufficiently studied phenomenon since it is rejected by normative orthography. Meanwhile, there are different points of view on the role and status of written fluctuations from in terms of the orthographic norm. This article discusses some types of spelling variance, distinguished in accordance with various criteria: a) synchronous and diachronic, b) conventional and codified, c) related to letter transmission, non-letter characters and to letter case, d) categorical and local, e) lexical and morphological, f) dictionary- and context-related, g) interpretative.

Diachronic spelling variance is a consequence of linguistic evolution. With the passage of time, outdated orthograms go out of orthographic use to give way to others. The usage variability is mainly related to neological processes in the language and, unlike a common mistake, it is based on internal linguistic contradictions. Codified variability is extremely rare, since there is a directive for monovariance of codification. Variance related to letter transmission is the least acceptable type of deviation in the view of some linguists. Non-letter variance (fused-hyphenated and fused-separated spellings, as well as variants involving the choice of uppercase/lowercase grapheme) are more related to semantic differences. Categorical variance affects an entire category of spelling phenomena, and local variance affects a separate lexeme or nest. Lexical variance concerns the word in its entire morphological paradigm, while morphological variance refers to individual word forms. With contextual variance, the choice of spelling is determined by context or discourse; variants of this type are especially common in the field of using capital graphemes, as well as in those cases when the affiliation of words with parts of speech is revealed by the context. With interpretative variance, the orthographic choice is based on a semantic criterion and depends on how the writer interprets the situation.

Keywords

orthography, spelling, variant, variance (variability), norm, codification

Publication date

27.06.2022

Number of characters

19875

Cite

GOST	Nechaeva I. On the Typology of Orthographic Variance in the Russian Language // Russkaya Rech’ – 2022. – Issue 3 C. 47-59 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/rusrech/s013161170020744-7-1-en (circulation date: 25.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013161170020744-7
MLA	Nechaeva, I. V. "On the Typology of Orthographic Variance in the Russian Language." Russkaya Rech’ 3 (2022):47-59. DOI: 10.31857/S013161170020744-7
APA	Nechaeva I. (2022). On the Typology of Orthographic Variance in the Russian Language. Russkaya Rech’ (3), pp.47-59 DOI: 10.31857/S013161170020744-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 383

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Beshenkova E. V., Ivanova O. E. Teoriya i praktika normirovaniya russkogo pis'ma [Theory and practice of normalization of Russian writing]. Moscow, Leksrus Publ., 2016. 424 p.
2. Brandt R. F. [On the pseudoscientific character of our spelling science]. Filologicheskie zapiski, 1901, no. 1–2, pp. 1–58. (In Russ.)
3. Bukchina B. Z. [Orthographic versions]. Literaturnaya norma i variantnost'. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1981, pp. 215–233. (In Russ.)
4. Grigor'eva T. M., Ponomareva S. V. [Norm and variability in Russian orthography]. Lingvisticheskii ezhegodnik Sibiri. Krasnoyarsk, 2001, no. 3, pp. 13–27. (In Russ.)
5. Grot Ya. K. Spornye voprosy russkogo pravopisaniya ot Petra Velikogo donyne [Moot points of Russian orthography from the time of Peter the Great to this day]. Moscow, Knizhnyi dom “Librokom”, 2017. 402 p.
6. Gvozdev A. N. Izbrannye raboty po orfografii i fonetike [Selected works on orthography and phonetics]. Moscow, Izdatel'stvo pedagogicheskikh nauk RSFSR, 1963. 284 p.
7. Kuz'mina S. M. [About softening of morals of russian orthography (on the problem of spelling variability)]. Zhizn' yazyka. Sbornik statei k 80-letiyu M. V. Panova. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul'tury Publ., 2001, pp. 406–411. (In Russ.)
8. Lopatin V. V. [Spelling and variability]. Yazyk kak materiya smysla. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publ., 2007, pp. 259–262. (In Russ.)
9. Naumenko S. V. [Spelling variation in scientific discussions and practice]. Voprosy kul'tury rechi. Issue 11. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyanskoi Kul'tury Publ., 2012, pp. 143–148. (In Russ.)
10. Nechaeva I. V. [Word-formation motivation of foreign words: spelling aspect of the problem]. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2005, no. 1 (9), pp. 83–95. (In Russ.)
11. Nechaeva I. V. [On shop(p)ing, mini(-)van, and the enigmas of orthographic codification]. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2012, no. 1 (23), pp. 72–89. (In Russ.)
12. Nechaeva I. V., Pertsov N. V. [On variability in Russian orthography]. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2020, no. 1, pp. 10–35. (In Russ.)
13. Panov M. V. [About the improvement of Russian orthography]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1963, no. 2, pp. 81–93 (In Russ.)
14. Shapiro A. B. Uporyadochennoe russkoe pravopisanie [Ordered Russian spelling]. Moscow, Izd-vo MGU, 1956, 38 p.
15. Shmelev A. D. [Acceptable spelling variation or a common mistake?] Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2021, no. 1 (41), pp. 9–30. (In Russ.)
16. Shmelev A. D. [Codification of Russian orthography and the spelling of human proper names with a capital letter – is there a problem?]. Russkaya rech', 2020, no. 4, pp. 42–53. (In Russ.)
17. Vinogradov V. V. [Culture of speech and orthography]. Literaturnaya gazeta, June 13 1964. (In Russ.)