Peculiarities of Referential Relation of the Pronoun Мы (We) in S. A. Yesenin’s Small Poems

The paper discusses the use of the personal pronoun мы (“we”) as means of denoting a persona in S. A. Yesenin’s “small” poems. The study focuses on referential correlation of the collective subject denoted by the pronoun мы.

The authors undertake a comprehensive contextual analysis of all мы pronouns in the most voluminous poem “Inonia”, in which the cosmogonic theme of the cycle is expressed most explicitly.

The investigation results in the conclusion that in three of four cases the fi rst “equity” participant of the collective subject denoted by the pronoun мы is the persona. However, in the last context we cannot determine the fi rst ‘equity’ participant. As for the second ‘equity’ participant, it cannot be determined in any of four cases.

Referential non-transparency of the pronoun мы has common features with the abstract character of the subjects in the sentences and inclination to non-referential or indefi nitely referential usage of persons’ nominations. Hence we can assume that the fact that it is impossible to identifi cate the collective subject denoted with the pronoun мы might be a poetological peculiarity of the cycle under study.

The authors present the results of contrastive analysis of frequency of the pronoun мы in prerevolutionary S. A. Yesenin’s lyrics and in his “small” poems. The research is based on the material from a poetry subcorpus of Russian National Corpus. In early work of S. A. Yesenin, the pronoun мы is used more rarely and its referential relation is more transparent. It is either defi nite (in narrative poetry and in poems addressed to a certain person) or non-referential (existential мы and universal мы). This confi rms the frequency and referential non-transparency of the pronoun мы in the poetic cycle under consideration. Summarizing the results, the authors claim that the contradictory system of dramatis personae created by means of unidentifi ed collective мы -subjects was one of the causes of polar opposite interpretations of “small” poems.

Keywords

S. A. Yesenin’s “small” poems, language of poetry, grammar of poetry, pronoun мы, referential relation of personal pronouns

Received

29.12.2020

Publication date

29.12.2020

Number of characters

22708

Cite

GOST	Arskaya Y., Mamedov A. Peculiarities of Referential Relation of the Pronoun Мы (“We”) in S. A. Yesenin’s “Small” Poems // Russkaya Rech’ – 2020. – Issue 6 C. 94-106 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/rusrech/s013161170012880-7-1-en (circulation date: 16.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013161170012880-7
MLA	Arskaya, Yuliya A., Mamedov, Akhmed A "Peculiarities of Referential Relation of the Pronoun Мы (“We”) in S. A. Yesenin’s “Small” Poems." Russkaya Rech’ 6 (2020):94-106. DOI: 10.31857/S013161170012880-7
APA	Arskaya Y., Mamedov A. (2020). Peculiarities of Referential Relation of the Pronoun Мы (“We”) in S. A. Yesenin’s “Small” Poems. Russkaya Rech’ (6), pp.94-106 DOI: 10.31857/S013161170012880-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 769

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arskaya Yu. A. [Metamorphoses of the author and his poetics: a linguistic analysis of S. A. Yesenins revolutionary poems]. Russkii yazyk v paradigme sovremennogo obrazovaniya: Rossiya i Ibero-Amerikanskii mir: materialy Mezhdunarodnogo foruma (1011 maya 2018 g. g. Kadis, Ispaniya) [The Russian language in the contemporary education paradigm: Russia and the Ibero-American world: materials of the International forum (May 1011 2018. Cadiz (Spain)]. Rostov-on-Don, Taganrog, Sthouthern Federal Univ. Publ., 2018, pp. 2025. (In Russ.)
2. Esenin S. A. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. V 7 t. T. 2. Stikhotvoreniya (Malen'kie poemy) [Complete Works. In 7 Vols. Vol. 2. Poems (Small Poems)]. Moscow, Nauka, Golos Publ., 1997. 464 p. (In Russ.)
3. Esenin S. A. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. V 7 t. T. 4. Stikhotvoreniya, ne voshedshie v Sobranie stikhotvorenii [Complete Works. In 7 Vols. Vol. 2. Poems not included into Collection of poems]. Moscow, Nauka, Golos Publ., 1996. 544 p.
4. Graneva I. Yu. Mestoimenie my v sovremennom russkom yazyke: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskii podkhod. Avtoref. dis. kand. filol. nauk [The pronoun ìû (we) in modern Russian: communicative and pragmatic approach: Êand. philol. sci. diss. abstract]. Kirov, 2009. 27 p.
5. Graneva I. Yu. [The pronoun ìû (we) and the problem of language conseptualization of the world]. Voprosy kognitivnoi lingvistiki, 2009, no. 2 (019), pp. 8287. (In Russ.)
6. Kuz'mishcheva N. M. Mifopoetika struyashchikhsya obrazov malen'kikh poem v kontekste eposa Sergeya Esenina: monografiya [Flowing images mythological poetics in small poems in context of Sergey Yesenins epos: a monograph]. Irkutsk, IGLU Publ., 2011. 313 p.
7. Lotman Yu. M. [Structure of a literary text]. Ob iskusstve [On the arts]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb Publ., 1998, pp. 14288. (In Russ.)
8. Natsionalnyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus]. Available at: http://ruscorpora.ru  (accessed 09.01.2020).
9. Norman B. Yu. [The Russian pronoun ìû (we): inner dramaturgy]. Russian linguistics, 2002, no. 26 (2), pp. 217234. (In Russ.)
10. Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost' s deistvitel'nost'yu (Referentsial'nye aspekty semantiki mestoimenii) [An utterance and its relation to reality (Referential aspects of pronouns semantics)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1985. 272 p.