The Distinctive Features of L. N. Tolstoy’s Epistolary Style in his Correspondence with A. A. Tolstoy

The article analyzes the distinctive features of L. N. Tolstoy’s correspondence with A. A. Tolstoy. The research allows us to witness the changes in the writer’s epistolary style over the course of nearly half a century. The division of L. N. Tolstoy and A. A. Tolstoy’s correspondence into several periods, correlating with the stages of Tolstoy’s life, makes it possible to determine that the reason for the change in the style was the evolution in the worldview of L. N. Tolstoy. The analysis of the composition, the themes, the means of artistic expression, the manner and the language features has revealed the artistic techniques inherent to Tolstoy’s epistolary style in different time periods. During the first period there were experiments with the form of presentation and language. Most distinctive features of the author’s epistolary style were established in 1860s. In the 1870s and 1880s, however, the religious theme came to the fore. The letters to A. A. Tolstoy contain invaluable information about the internal transformations of the writer. They reflect his moral and spiritual quest, worldview crisis, the change of spiritual guidelines and the formation of new beliefs. The disagreements of the addressees became the reason why the epistolary conversation took the form of religious controversy. The last period of their dialogue (the 1890s, early 1900s) has a confessional character. The versatility of the correspondence style indicates its importance in the epistolary heritage of the writer, as well as the need for further research of not only the biographical, but also theartistic component.

Keywords

epistolary style, form and content, means of artistic expression, language and thematic of letters, artistic image, religious polemics, revelation

Received

01.04.2020

Publication date

01.04.2020

Number of characters

25846

Cite

GOST
MLA	Shcherbinina, Аnna A. "The Distinctive Features of L. N. Tolstoy’s Epistolary Style in his Correspondence with A. A. Tolstoy." Russkaya Rech’ 1 (2020):78-90. DOI: 10.31857/S013161170008299-7
APA	Shcherbinina А. (2020). The Distinctive Features of L. N. Tolstoy’s Epistolary Style in his Correspondence with A. A. Tolstoy. Russkaya Rech’ (1), pp.78-90 DOI: 10.31857/S013161170008299-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 940

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Azarova N. I. [Epistolary novel-confession]. L. N. Tolstoy and A. A. Tolstaya. Perepiska (1857–1903) [Correspondence (1857–1903)]. Resp. ed. L. D. Gromova-Opulskaya, I. G. Ptushkina. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2011, pp. 623–683. (In Russ.)

2. Lazarchuk R. M. [Correspondence L. N. Tolstoy with T. A. Ergolskaya and A. A. Tolstaya and epistolary culture of the late 18th – first third of the 19th c.]. L. N. Tolstoi i russkaya literaturno-obshchestvennaya mysl' [L. N. Tolstoy and Russian literary and social thought]. Ed. G. Ya. Galagan, N. I. Prutskova. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1979, pp. 85–98. (In Russ.)

3. Petrovskaya E. V. [Correspondence L. N. Tolstoy with A. A. Tolstoy as a holistic text]. Yasnopolyanskii sbornik 1998 [Yasnaya Polyana collection], 1999, pp. 171–180. (In Russ.)

4. Salmanova I. F. [The nature of confession in the correspondence of L. N. Tolstoy and A. Tolstaya]. Nauka. Kul'tura. Iskusstvo: aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki v 4 tomakh [Science. Culture. Art: actual problems of theory and practice in 4 vols.]. Vol. 1. Resp. ed. S. N. Borisov. Belgorod, Publ. House of Belgorod Stat. Inst. of Arts and Culture, 2016, pp. 159–165. (In Russ.)

5. Tolstoi L. N. and Tolstaya A. A. Perepiska (1857–1903) [Correspondence (1857–1903)]. Resp. ed. L. D. Gromova-Opulskaya, I. G. Ptushkina. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2011. 974 p.

6. Tolstoi L. N. [Letters]. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 90 tomakh [Complete works in 90 vols.]. Ed. V. G. Chertkova. Moscow, Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaya Literatura Publ., 1928–1958. Vol. 60–74.