views: 134
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Bityukova V. R., Prusikhin O. E. (2022), Integral assessment of environmental situation in closed administrative units in Russian Federation, Regional'nye issledovanija, 2022, no. 1, pp. 102–114. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2022-1-9.
2. Bityukova V. R. (2014), Integral assessment of the ecological situation of Russian cities. Regional'nye issledovanija, no. 4, pp. 49–57. (In Russ.).
3. Bobylev S. N., Minakov V. S., Solov'eva S. V., Tret'jakov V. V. (2012), Jekologo jekonomicheskij indeks regionov RF. Metodika i pokazateli dlja rascheta [Ecological economic index of regions of the Russian Federation. Methodology and indicators for calculation], Moscow, WWF Russia, RIA Novosti, 147 p. (In Russ.).
4. Borodkin F. M., Ajvazjan S. A. (2006), Social'nye indikatory [Social indicators], Moscow, JuNITI-DANA, 607 p. (In Russ.).
5. Dobrolyubova Yu. S. (2015), Review of foreign socio-ecological ratings of cities and their comparison with Russian counterparts, Regional'nye issledovanija, no. 4, pp. 65–75. (In Russ.).
6. Zhdanchikov P. A., Ilyina I. N. (2023), The index of urban success: to substantiate the methodology and methods of data collection, Regional economy: theory and practice, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 230–254. (In Russ.).
7. Zhikharevich B. S., Klimanov V. V., Maracha V. G. (2020), Resilience of the territory: concept, measurement, governance, Regional'nye issledovanija, no. 3, pp. 4–15. https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2020-3-1. (In Russ.).
8. Zavodskikh A. A. (2020), Building an index of inclusive development of regions, Pskov Journal of Regional Studies, no. 2 (42), pp. 19–41. (In Russ.).
9. Zemlyansky D. Yu., Makhrova A. G., Medvednikova D. M. (2020), Methodological approaches to the compilation of complex indices of socio-economic development of cities, Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 5. Geography, no. 4, pp. 21–31. (In Russ.).
10. Kukarin M. V., Rokotyanskaya V. V. (2021), Improving the methodology for assessing the sustainable development of municipalities, Vestnik universiteta, no. 6, pp. 96–103. (In Russ.).
11. Makeeva E. Y., Ivashkovskaya I. V., Ruzhanskaya L. S., Popov K. A. (2021), Relationship between regional socio-economic development and corporate ratings of Russian companies, Jekonomika regiona, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 86–102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-1-7.
12. Malinin V. N., Orleanskaja E. S. (2013), Analysis of the environmental and economic index of Russian regions, Obshhestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana), no. 4 (29), pp. 229–234. (In Russ.)
13. Molyarenko O. A. (2014), The prospects of municipal statistics and local self-government data collection problems, Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Social'no-jekonomicheskie nauki, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 125–139. (In Russ.).
14. Jekologicheskij sled sub’ektov Rossijskoj Federacii [Ecological footprint of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation] (2017), Boev P. A. (ed.), Moscow, WWF Russia, 72 p. (In Russ.).
15. Araújo R. V., Espejo R. A., Constantino M., de Moraes P. M., Taveira J.C., Lira F. S., Herrera G. P., Costa R. (2021), Eco-efficiency measurement as an approach to improve the sustainable development of municipalities: A case study in the Midwest of Brazil, Environmental Development, vol. 39, 100652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2021.100652.
16. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide (2008), E. Giovannini, M. Nardo, M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, A. Tarantola, A. Hoffman, Paris, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 162 р.
17. Henrysson M., Papageorgiou A., Björklund A., Vanhuyse F., Sinha R. (2022), Monitoring progress towards a circular economy in urban areas: An application of the European Union circular economy monitoring framework in Umeå municipality, Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 87, 104245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104245.
18. Jiang P.-C., Feng G.-F., Yang H.-C. (2022), New measurement of sovereign ESG index, Innovation and Green Development, vol. 1, no. 2, 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2022.100009.
19. Kilic H. S., Yalcin A. S. (2021), Comparison of municipalities considering environmental sustainability via neutrosophic DEMATEL based TOPSIS, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, vol. 75, 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100827.
20. Liang Z., Zhang M., Mao Q., Yu B., Ma B. (2018), Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments, Int J Environ Res Public Health, no. 15 (7), 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071473.
21. Tsang A., Frost T., Cao H. (2023), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review, The British Accounting Review, vol. 55, no. 1, 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101149.
22. Zakharova E. N., Prokhorova V. V. (2015), Modeling of Sustainable Development of the Region on the Basis of Cognitive Analysis, Asian Social Science, no. 11. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n7p362.
23. Zhi L., Xiaoling O., Kerui D., Yang Z. (2017), Does government transparency contribute to improved eco-efficiency performance? An empirical study of 262 cities in China, Energy Policy, vol. 110, no. 20, pp.79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.001.