Socio-geographic aspects of conservation of ethnocultural identity and traditional forms of natural use in Setomaa

 
PIIS221979310017152-0-1
DOI10.37490/S221979310017152-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Pskov State University
Address: Russian Federation, Pskov
Affiliation: Estonian University of Life Sciences
Address: Estonia,Tartu
Journal namePskov Journal of Regional Studies
EditionVolume 17. No4 /2021
Pages47-56
Abstract

The systems of traditional intercommunal interaction, the peculiarities of settlement and the features of the ethno-territorial economic specialization of Setos that have developed over the centuries allow highlighting the most significant factors that are important for the preservation of their cultural identity. Currently, the territorial specificity of ethnocultural unity was strongly influenced by three factors: firstly, this is the division of the traditional territory of residence of the ethnic group by state borders, and the difficulties of cross-border interaction have significantly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and secondly, these are trends in demographic processes — depopulation and migration outflow from rural areas, thirdly, determined by changes in the economic and technological structure of the craft traditions of the ethnos to the needs of the tourism sector. The purpose of the study is to identify, systemize and substantiate modern forms of transmission from generation to generation of the traditions of Seto trades and crafts in conditions of territorial and partly social disunity of the ethnic group. The methods of socio-economic and cultural interaction within and outside the traditional territory of settlement of this ethnic group were also studied. It is important to identify the elements of the traditional culture of Seto that have retained their relevance in the modern way of life, and along with them — meaningfully new types of economic activity of local and network Seto ethnocultural communities.

KeywordsRussian-Estonian border, Seto, traditional culture, trades and crafts, ethno-economic systems
Received12.10.2021
Publication date05.12.2021
Number of characters19009
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.
1 Introduction. Socio-political changes over the past hundred years have significantly changed both the social structure and the technological order, have led to changes in the demographic processes and in the structure of Seto settlement, as well as the forms of maintenance and reproduction of the ethnocultural component of the ethnic society. In the changing economic order over the decades of the second half of the twentieth century, traditional crafts gradually receded into the past and the connection between generations in the transfer of traditional technologies and methods of economic activity was weakened. The traditional communal and tribal land use was replaced by collective forms of agriculture, and then the introduction of intensive technologies and a radical enlargement of production volumes as part of the development of regional ago-industrial complexes. In parallel with these trends, there was an outflow of migrants to cities, weakening and breaking of family and clan ties, aging of the population and depopulation of remote farms and villages in the territory of Setomaa both in the south-east of Estonia and in the Pechora district of the Pskov region.
2 Among the stable and strong positive trends, one can note the burst of national self-awareness of the Setos in the late ХХ early ХХI centuries, when the national self-identification and the revival of community at the communicative and socio-political levels again began to attract the attention of both young representatives of the indigenous ethnic groups themselves, who also live outside of Setomaa and the public. Digital communication technologies played a significant role in this rise of ethnocultural consciousness and the acquisition of new forms of interaction as well as interaction in the Internet communities and social networks, SMM-promotion of the phenomenon of cultural “otherness” and the search for ethnic ancestral roots. In parallel the collection and systematization, as well as the dissemination of traditional technologies, trades and crafts through Internet resources, moreover, both on a commercial basis, including project and grant, and as a meaningful ethnocultural component of the network communication of social groups and communities.
3 Modern socio-economic and political transformations contributed to the thinning of cultural interaction, the erosion of the established forms of interactions of the Seto ethnic group, the settlement area of which is currently fragmented and rapidly decreasing. At the beginning of the XXI century, after almost two decades of gradual liberalization of the cross-border regime and some support from governments of Estonia and Russia for ethnocultural contacts, the interaction of ethno-territorial communities, separated by the border Russian and Estonian Setos, again turned out to be complicated due to the introduction of restrictions on movement associated with the pandemic of COVID-19.
4 Assessment of the possibilities of preserving ethnic identity and forms of communication of the divided small ethnic group Seto in the modern socio-economic structure of society is a debatable topic from both demographic and humanitarian-cultural points of view.
5 Purpose of the study — systematization and substantiation of new forms of ethnic self-identification and transmission from generation-to-generation traditions of Seto trades and crafts as well as methods of social, economic and of the settlement of this ethnic group. It is important to identify what has remained and is being reconstructed from the traditional Seto culture, and what is meaningfully new filling of local and network ethnocultural communities.
6 It took: 1) track the changes that have occurred in the socio-economic and technological spheres (in the part where it concerns the assessment of the conformity of local traditions of the past and the present, the authenticity of handicrafts); 2) explore modern forms and methods of transmission of traditions of Seto culture, its preservation, reproduction and development; 3) to determine the possibilities of preserving the ethnos and its material and spiritual culture in conditions of territorial disunity.
7 State of knowledge of the problem. Due to the fact that the traditional settlement area of the Seto is old-developed and located in close proximity to state border of Estonia and Russia, features of their settlement, way of life and cultural traditions within Setomaa have been studied in sufficient detail, and expeditions were carried out almost on a regular basis throughout the ХХ century, as well as in recent decades. So, for example, information on the population and the area of settlement of the Seto was collected and presented in the reports of expeditions more than a century ago, in the works of the first researchers of Setomaa, such as M. Mirotvortsev [8], Ju. Trusman [16; 17], Ja. Gurt [2], V. Buck [21]. But it is rather difficult to construct an estimate of the dynamics of the population and to link the data of several studies, since the number of Setos varied depending on the clarity of the clarity of the ethnic self-identification of the local population in different historical periods.

views: 392

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Goldovanskaya I. B. (2018), Seto (Seto) People as a Phenomenon of Regional Culture of the North-West of Russia, Cultural landscape of the borderlands: past, present, future. Materials of the II International scientific conference, Pskov, pp. 63–68. (In Russ.).

2. Gurt J. About the Pskov Estonians, or the so-called “setukez” (1906), News of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society, 1905, vol. XLI, SPb., pp. 1–22. (In Russ.).

3. Zadorin M. Yu., Hramtsova A. A., Solovyova A. N. (2018), Setu: history and current status of the ethnic and cultural community in Russia, International scientific review of the problems and prospects of modern science and education. Collection of scientific articles XLVII International correspondence scientific and practical conference, ed. Emma Morgan, Boston, Problems of Science, pp. 43–52. (In Russ.).

4. Gadlo A. V., ed. (1998), Historical and ethnographic essays of the Pskov territory, Pskov, 315 p. (In Russ.).

5. Kolpakova Yu. V. (2013), Information about the set in the XVI–XX centuries. based on the materials of the Russian State Archive of Ancient Acts (RGADA) and the State Archive of the Pskov Region, Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Social'no-gumanitarnye i psihologo-pedagogicheskie nauki”, no. 2, pp. 162–172. (In Russ.).

6. Manakov A. G., Potapova K. N. (2013), An ethnic-social portrait of the Setos of Pechorskii District, Pskov Region (through Case Studies of 1999–2011), Etnograficeskoe Obozrenie, no, 2, pp. 177–187. (In Russ.).

7. Manakov A. G., Suvorkov P. E. (2017), Age-sex structure and employment of the Setos of the Pechora region according to the results of the study in the fall of 2016, Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Estestvenny`e i fiziko-matematicheskie nauki”, no. 10, pp. 35–43. (In Russ.).

8. Peacekeepers M. (1860), About the estates or semi-verts of the Pskov province, Memorable book of the Pskov province for 1860, Pskov, pp. 45–61.

9. Vasilyeva T. V., Manakov A. G., Slinchak A. I., Terenina N. K. (2014), Essays on the ethnography and historical geography of the western frontier of the Pskov region, Pskov, 162 p. (In Russ.).

10. Potapova K. N. (2012), The results of the study of identity to the Set of Pechora district of the Pskov region in the post-Soviet period, Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Estestvennye i fiziko-matematicheskie nauki”, no 1, pp. 104–110. (In Russ.).

11. Richter E. V. (1979), Integration of the Setos with the Estonian nation, Eesti talurahvamajandusejaolmearengujooni 19 ja 20 sajandil [Essays on the development of the economy and life of Estonian peasants in the 19th and 20th centuries], Tallinn, pp. 90–119. (In Russ.).

12. Richter E. V. (1954), Results of ethnographic work among the Set of the Pskov region in the summer of 1952, Materials of the Baltic ethnographic-anthropological expedition (1952). Proceedings of Miklouho-Maclay Institute of ethnography, New series, vol. XXIII, Moscow, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, pp. 183–193. (In Russ.).

13. Richter E. V. (1961), Material culture of the Seto in the XIX — early XX century (on the issue of the ethnic history of the Seto), Author's abstract. dis. ... Cand. ist. Sciences, Moscow — Tallinn, 22 p. (In Russ.).

14. Suvorkov P. E., Manakov A. G. (2019), Simulation modeling of demographic development in the 21st century Setos (Setos) of the Pechora region of the Pskov region and the Vyru district of Estonia, Natural and historical and cultural heritage of Eastern Europe as an object of socio-geographical research, Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Pskov, Pskov State University Publ., pp. 136–143. (In Russ.).

15. Terenina N. K. (2014), Reflection of the landscape items of south-eastern Estonia and Pechora district (Pskov region) in the setu folklore heritage, Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Estestvennye i fiziko-matematicheskie nauki”, no. 5, pp. 108–116. (In Russ.).

16. Trusman Yu. (1897), About the origin of the Pskov-Pechora half-believers, Zhivaya starina, no. 1, St. Petersburg, pp. 37–47. (In Russ.).

17. Trusman Y. (1890), Semi-Vertians of the Pskov-Pechersk TerritoryZhivaya starina, no. I, St. Petersburg, pp. 31–62. (In Russ.).

18. Hagu P. S. (1983), Agrarian rituals and beliefs of the Setos, Ph. D. thesis ist. Sciences, Tartu, 386 p. (In Russ.).

19. Hagu P. S. (1983), Calendar ritual of Russians and Setos of the Pechora region, Archeology and history of Pskov and the Pskov land, Pskov, pp. 51–52. (In Russ.).

20. Annist A. (2014), Heterotoopiast hegemooniaks: võim ja kultuur Setomaal, Maastik ja mälu. Eesti pärandiloome arengujooni, Toim H. Sooväli-Sepping, I. Kaljundi. Tallinn, TÜ kirjastus, pp. 418–440. (In Est.).

21. Buck V. (1909), Petseri eestlased, Tartu, Postimees Publ., 79 p. (In Est.).

22. Eichenbaum К. (1998), Rahvakultuuri ja traditsioonide järjepidevus, Ajaloolise Setomaa põlisasustuse säilimise võimalused, Võru, Võru Instituut Publ., no. 2, pp. 61–76.(In Est.).

23. Hiiemäe M. (2003), Lõuna-Eesti territooriumi jaotused rahvakalendri tavandi näitel, Tü Lekkar, no. 11, pp. 31–44. (In Est.).

24. Kalkun A. (2014), Fasts and Feasts in Estonians`Representations of the Seto Culture, Jornal of Etnology and Folkloristics, vol. 8 (1), pp. 53–73.

25. Kiristaja A. (2013), Setomaa kohanimed. (Seto Instituudi Toimatised, 1) [Värska; Tallinn]. (In Est.).

26. Külvik M., Palo K., Puura I., comp. and eds. (2016), Setomaa 1. Nature, Tartu, Estonian National Museum, 543 p. (In Est.).

27. Manakov A. G., Kliimask J. (2020), Russian-Estonian Border In The Context Of Post-Soviet Ethnic Transformations, Geography, Environment, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 16–20. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-68.

28. Manakov A. G., Terenina N. K. (2015), The Baltic Finnish peoples divided by state and administrative borders: territorial development of the Karelians, Vepsians, and Setos, Baltic Region, no. 1 (23), pp. 96–107. https://doi.org/10.5922 / 2079-8555-2015-1-8.

29. Reissar L. (1996), Setumaa läbisajandite: Petserimaa, Tallinn, Kupar Publ., 270 р. (In Est.).

30. Valk H., Lillak A., Selart A., comp. and eds. (2009), Setomaa 2. Ancient History from Ancient to 1920, Tartu, Estonian National Museum, 480 p. (In Est.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up