Discourse: Current Trends and Perspectives of Psycholinguistic Research

Publication type Article
Status Published
Occupation: Head Laboratory of Psychology of Speech and Psycholinguistics IP RAS
Affiliation: FSBUN Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Russian Federation
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 39 № 6

The article deals with prospects of psycholinguistic studies of discourse at the present stage of science and practice development. The characteristic of discourse approach is given, the current directions of research connected with various aspects of discourse organization and its functioning in society are reviewed. It is shown that trends in the development of this science area will be determined in many ways: by the influence of growing attention to the diversity of contexts and communicative situations, by the consideration of the psychological characteristics of communication partners, by the interest in the process of interaction and discourse effects, and also by the impact of globalization and technological changes. The development of researches on discourse types that appear because of new information technologies (SMS discourse, post-event discourse in the Internet, etc.) is projected. Personological and ethnopsycholinguistic studies on the discursive indicators of personal characteristics, ethnocultural specificity of discourse and intercultural understanding are likely to be elaborated. Discursive abilities are claimed to be equally important subject in communication studies. At the same time, the growing role of communication brings to the forefront issues of conversational strategies, tactics, and their definitions that as a whole might determine the prospects for studying interactions (live/online) in different spheres of life and optimization of conversation management. Various approaches to studying discourse effects and conceptualization of worldview in discourse are considered to be promising and practically relevant as well as research on how improve a foreign language and discursive skills. The future results might help to provide for both human-computer interaction and information-psychological security. The integrating role of cognitive studies on discourse, which brings psycholinguistics closer to neurosciences, is emphasized.

Keywordsdiscourse, new discourse types, discourse influence, discursive personology, interlocutors’ intentions, conversational tactics, conceptualization of reality, tendencies of development, forecast
Publication date22.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 2097

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Almaev N. A. Primenenie kontent-analiza v issledovaniyakh lichnosti: metodicheskie voprosy. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2012.

2. Afinogenova V. A., Pavlova N. D. Intentsional'nye patterny v replikakh sobesednikov // Ehksperimental'naya psikhologiya. 2015. T. 8. № 2. S. 36–44.

3. Vezhnovets E. A. Kommentarii v sotsial'nykh setyakh: proizvodstvo i vosproizvodstvo internet-diskursa // Sovremennyj diskurs-analiz. 2016. Vyp. 15. S. 35–58.

4. Voronin A. N. Diskursivnye sposobnosti: teoriya, metody izucheniya, psikhodiagnostika. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2015.

5. Grebenschikova T. A., Zachesova I. A. Intentsional'nyj aspekt vzaimodejstviya v semejnom dialoge // Voprosy psikholingvistiki. 2012. № 16. S. 106–113.

6. Grebenschikova T. A., Zachesova I. A. Psikhologiya povsednevnogo diskursa. Intentsional'nyj aspekt. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014.

7. Dejk T. A. van. Diskurs i vlast'. Reprezentatsiya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikatsii. M.: LIBROKOM, 2013.

8. Diskurs v sovremennom mire. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya / Pod red. N. D. Pavlovoj, I. A. Zachesovoj. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2011.

9. Zhuravlev A. L., Pavlova N. D. K mezhdistsiplinarnoj problematike diskursa // Situatsionnaya i lichnostnaya determinatsiya diskursa / Pod red. N. D. Pavlovoj, I. A. Zachesovoj. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2007. S. 6–11.

10. Zagorovskaya O. V., Litvinova O. A., Litvinova T. A., Seredin P. V., Serdyuk M. E. Diagnostirovanie sklonnosti avtora pis'mennogo teksta k autoagressivnomu povedeniyu // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gos. un-ta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya. 2015. № 3. S. 98–104.

11. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoj rechi / 6-e izd., dopolnen. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2012.

12. Kibrik A. A., Podlesskaya V. I. Problema segmentatsii ustnogo diskursa i kognitivnaya sistema govoryaschego / Kognitivnye issledovaniya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2006. S. 138–158.

13. Klimchuk V. A. Motivatsionnyj diskurs lichnosti: kolichestvennye kharakteristiki i sravnitel'nyj analiz // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obschestvo. 2015. T. 6. № 1. S. 68–83.

14. Kubrak T. A. Spetsifika psikhologicheskogo vozdejstviya kinodiskursa // Psikhologicheskoe vozdejstvie: Mekhanizmy, strategii, vozmozhnosti protivodejstviya M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2012. S. 202–222.

15. Kushakova N. O. Spetsificheskie zhanry sms-diskursa // Kommunikativnye issledovaniya. 2016. № 1 (7). S. 60–72.

16. Latynov V. V. Psikhologiya kommunikativnogo vozdejstviya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013.

17. Latynov V. V. Psikhologicheskie zakonomernosti ob'yasneniya neehtichnykh postupkov // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2015. T. 36. № 1. S. 61–70.

18. Morozov V. P. Neverbal'naya kommunikatsiya. Ehksperimental'no-psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2011.

19. Nestik T. A., Zhuravlev A. L., Yurevich A. V. Prognoz razvitiya psikhologicheskoj nauki i praktiki k 2030 g. // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2016. T. 37. № 5. S. 45–64.

20. Pavlova N. D. Mekhanizmy i sredstva psikhologicheskogo vozdejstviya v diskurse // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2013. T. 6. № 32. S. 3.

21. Pavlova N. D., Grebenschikova T. A. Intent-analiz postsobytijnogo diskursa v internete // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya: ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2017. T. 10. № 52. S. 8.

22. Pavlova N. D., Grebenschikova T. A. Intent-analiz. Osnovaniya, protsedura, opyt ispol'zovaniya. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2017.

23. Psikhologiya diskursa: problemy determinatsii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti / Pod red. A. L. Zhuravleva, N. D. Pavlovoj, I. A. Zachesovoj. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.

24. Sedov K. F. Diskurs i lichnost': ehvolyutsiya kommunikativnoj kompetentsii. M.: Labirint, 2004.

25. Sergeeva A. S., Kirillov B. A., Voronina E. Yu. Kommentarij kak forma diskursa professional'nogo virtual'nogo soobschestva (na primere IT) // Psikhologiya diskursa: problemy determinatsii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016. C. 84–101.

26. Ushakova T. N. Rozhdenie slova. Problemy psikhologii rechi i psikholingvistiki. M., 2011.

27. Tseptsov V. A., Oliv T., Piola A., Kellogg R. Resursy rabochej pamyati v protsesse planirovaniya rechi na rodnom i inostrannom yazyke // Problemy psikhologii diskursa M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2005. S. 165–179.

28. Chernyavskaya V. E. Diskurs vlasti i vlast' diskursa: problemy rechevogo vozdejstviya. M.: Flinta: Nauka, 2006.

29. Shejgal E. I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. M.: Gnozis, 2004.

30. Yazyk i mysl': sovremennaya kognitivnaya lingvistika. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2015.

31. Yazykovaya lichnost': modelirovanie, tipologiya, portretirovanie (sibirskaya lingvopersonologiya) / Pod red. N. D. Goleva, N. N. Shpil'noj. M.: LENAND, 2014.

32. Coe K., Kensk K., Rains S. Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments // Journal of Communication. 2014.V. 64(4). P. 658–679.

33. Heritage J. Conversation analysis: practices and methods // Qualitative research: theory, method and practice (3rd edition). Ed. D. Silverman. L.: Sage, 2011. P. 208–230.

34. Muddiman A., Stroud N. J. News values, cognitive biases, and partisan incivility in comment sections // Journal of Communication. 2017. 67. R. 586–609.

35. Stroud N.J., Scacco J.M., Muddiman A., Curry A. L. Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ Facebook sites // Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 2015. 20. P. 188–203.

Система Orphus