All
 
|
 
 


Modern Concepts of Psychology: Evolution of Understanding the Logic of their Organization
 
PIIS020595920029015-2-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920029015-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
A. N. Plyusch 
Occupation: senior researcher
Affiliation: National Technical University of Ukraine “Kyiv Polytechnic Institute named after Igor Sikorsky”
Address: Ukraine, Kyiv
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 44 №6
Pages114-123
Abstract

A post-nonclassical methodology was used, within which simple, complex, self-developing systems are considered. In accordance with the methodology, the system of concepts is considered as a set of autonomous terms, on the basis of which theories are constructed, which are part of the semiotic space of their authors. Semiotic space as a microcosm of individual meanings and meanings, formed in the process of life, serves as a model of the world, an instrument of self-organization of the subject, and a potential mechanism for joint development. Considering that the mental organization of the researcher and the organization of his social context are interdependent and linked by circular causality, the complexity of their organization turns out to be conjugate. The same principle applies to the collective subject of science. Science as a social institution of society reproduces the complexity of the organization of society, and the complexity of the mental instrument of scientists becomes associated with the complexity of the organization of their scientific community and the problems of society that it solves. In the history of science, there is an evolution of basic metaphors for understanding scientific knowledge from an archive of knowledge and a network tool for researchers to a quantum compass, which indicates the directions of development of society based on joint activities in building the future, suggesting the possibility of its self-development in this process. The system of concepts as a fragment of the mental tool of researchers in understanding its development reproduces the logic of the evolution of scientific knowledge. Understanding the organization of a system of concepts, depending on the methodology of researchers, is transformed from the classification of concepts to their system-network organization, and from them to the hypertext of a self-developing collective subject of science.

Keywordspost-non-classical methodology, system of concepts, mental tool, quantum compass, self-developing collective subject of science, hypertext
Publication date30.12.2023
Number of characters32264
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 62

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Vasil'kova V.V. Seti v social'nom poznanii: ot metafory k metateorii. Zhurn. sociologii i social'noj antropologii. 2012. V. 15. № 5 (64). P. 11–25. (In Russian)
2. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Analiz sovremennyh ponyatij v psihologii. Chast' I. Opyt sistematizacii ponyatij. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. № 3. V. 42. P. 5–15. (In Russian)
3. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Analiz sovremennyh ponyatij v psihologii. Chast' II. Razrabotka uchenyh instituta psihologii RAN. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. № 4. V. 42. P. 5–15. (In Russian)
4. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Sistemno-setevaya organizaciya sovremennyh ponyatij psihologii (na primere razrabotok sotrudnikov Instituta psihologii RAN). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2022. № 3. V 43. P. 5–14. (In Russian)
5. Klochko V.E. Samoorganizaciya v psihologicheskih sistemah: problemy stanovleniya mental'nogo prostranstva lichnosti (vvedenie v transspektivnyj analiz). Tomsk: Tomskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2005. (In Russian)
6. Kol'cova V.A. Gumanitarnoe znanie: istoriya i perspektivy razvitiya. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 37–71. (In Russian)
7. Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. Saint Petersburg: “Iskusstvo-SPB”, 2000. (In Russian)
8. Ot sravnitel'noj k mezhkul'turnoj filosofii. Ed. M.T. Stepanyanc. Moscow: Nauka; Vost. lit., 2022. (In Russian)
9. Patyaeva E.Yu. Klassicheskoe, neklassicheskoe i postneklassicheskoe znanie v sovremennoj psihologii. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 160–194. (In Russian)
10. Petrenko V.F. Osnovy psihosemantiki. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2005. (In Russian)
11. Plyushch A.N. Ponimanie identichnosti v kontekste kul'turno-istoricheskoj psihologii. Psihologiya. 2023. № 2. P. 338–354. (In Russian)
12. Plyushch A.N. Stanovlenie sub"ekta: ot bessub"ektnosti k metasub"ektnosti. Voprosy psihologii. 2020. № 3. P. 14–26. (In Russian)
13. Ponomarev Ya.A. Metodologicheskoe vvedenie v psihologiyu. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. (In Russian)
14. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Ed. A.L. Zhuravleva, A.V. Yurevicha. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. (In Russian)
15. Rubinshtejn S.L. Bytie i soznanie. Moscow: Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1957. (In Russian)
16. Sergienko E.A. Psihicheskoe razvitie s pozicij sistemno-sub"ektnogo podhoda. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2021. (In Russian)
17. Stepin V.S. Filosofiya nauki. Obshchie problemy. Moscow.: Gardariki, 2006. (In Russian)
18. Chelovek kak otkrytaya celostnost'. Eds. L.P. Kiyashchenko, T.A. Sidorov. Novosibirsk: Akademizdat, 2022. (In Russian)
19. Fuko M. Prostranstvo, znanie i vlast'. Intellektualy i vlast': Izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu. Moscow: Praksis, 2006. P. 215–236. (In Russian)
20. Yanchuk V.A. Sociokul'turno-interdeterministskaya dialogicheskaya perspektiva pozicionirovaniya v psihologicheskom mnogoobrazii. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 385–409. (In Russian)
21. Yachin S.E. Sostoyanie metakul'tury. Vladivostok: Dal'nauka, 2010. (In Russian)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up