Approbation of Modified Hostility Scale in Russian-speaking sample

 
PIIS020595920024439-8-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920024439-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Leading Researcher, Department of Personality Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Head of the Department of Clinical Psychology of the FSBSI “Mental Health Research Center”
Affiliation:
FSBSI "Mental Health Research Center"
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 44 Issue 4
Pages63-71
Abstract

This article presents the results of an approbation of Modified Hostility Scale. This questionnaire is designed based on Russian translation of Cook-Medley Hostility scale by reducing the number and translation correction of several items. Statistical and content analyzes of data show that Modified Hostility Scale is reliable and convergently valid. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes showed the 3-factor structure of questionnaire: cynicism, negativism, alertness. This structure is semantically close to the 4-factor structure of original Russian translation of Cook-Medley scale. However, our factors are non-orthogonal. This corresponds to the logic of “maternal” questionnaire construction (MMPI) from which the Ho scale (Cook-Medley Hostility scale) was originally taken.

Keywordshostility, aggression, cynicism, negativism, alertness, Ho scale, approbation of questionnaire
Received12.08.2023
Publication date02.10.2023
Number of characters19307
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 112

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Behron R., Richardson D. Agressiya. 2-e izdanie. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2018.

2. Grischenkova A.E. Polovozrastnye osobennosti atributsii vrazhdebnosti shkol'nikov. Psikholog. 2015. №. 4. P. 139–316.

3. Enikolopov S.N. Vrazhdebnost' v klinicheskoj i kriminal'noj psikhologii. National Psychological Journal. 2007. V. 2. №. 1. P. 33–39.

4. Enikolopov S.N. Psikhologiya vrazhdebnosti v meditsine i psikhiatrii. Sovremennaya terapiya psikhicheskikh rasstrojstv. 2007. №. 1. P. 18–22.

5. Enikolopov S.N., Tsibul'skij N.P. Psikhometricheskij analiz russkoyazychnoj versii Oprosnika diagnostiki agressii A. Bassa i M. Perri. Psychological Journal. 2007. V. 28. №. 1. P. 115–124.

6. Enikolopov S.N., Kuznetsova Yu.M., Chudova N.V. Agressiya v obydennoj zhizni. Moscow: Politicheskaya ehntsiklopediya, 2014.

7. Enikolopov S.N., Chudova N.V. Problema proyavlenij vrazhdebnoj ustanovki. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. V. 10. № 54. P. 12. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrascheniya: 01.02.2023)

8. Kuznetsova S.O., Abramova A.A. Vrazhdebnost' i psikhicheskoe zdorov'e [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. Psychology and Law. 2011. V. 1. №. 2. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/psylaw/archive/2011_n2/40886 (data obrascheniya: 15.02.2023)

9. Kuznetsova S.O., Abramova A.A., Enikolopov S.N., Razumova A.V. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti vrazhdebnosti u bol'nykh s shizofreniej, shizoaffektivnymi i affektivnymi rasstrojstvami Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. Series 14. Psychology. 2014. №. 3. P. 92–103.

10. Leont'ev A.N. Obraz mira. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983.

11. Rean A.A. Svoboda: otvetstvennost', negativizm, zabota. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. Series 14. Psychology. 2021. №. 3. P. 83–101.

12. Smirnov S.D. Psikhologiya obraza: problema aktivnosti psikhicheskogo otrazheniya. Moscow: Mosk. gos. Universitet,1985.

13. Sobchik L.N. Vvedenie v psikhologiyu individual'nosti. Moscow: Institut prikladnoj psikhologii. 1997.

14. Yavorskij A.A., Yavorskij R.A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie stigmy, dezadaptatsiya i geteroagressiya. Bulletin of Liberal Arts University. 2015. №. 2. P. 10–18.

15. Barefoot J.C. Developments in the measurement of hostility. Ed. H.S. Friedman. Hostility, coping, & health. American Psychological Association. 1992. P. 13–31.

16. Bentler P.M., Bonnet D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 1980. V. 88. №. 3. P. 588–606.

17. Buss A.H. The psychology of aggression. New York: Wiley, 1961.

18. Byrne B. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications and programming. London: Routledge Academic, 2011.

19. Dodge K.A. et al. Hostile attributional biases in severely aggressive adolescents. Journal of abnormal psychology. 1990. V. 99. №. 4. P. 385–392.

20. Epps J., Kendall P.C. Hostile attributional bias in adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1995. V. 19. P. 159–178.

21. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal. 1999. V. 6. №. 1. P. 1–55.

22. Larkin K.T., Martin R.R., McClain S.E. Cynical hostility and the accuracy of decoding facial expressions of emotions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2002. V. 25. P. 285–292.

23. Moreno J.K., Selby M.J., Fuhriman A., Laver G.D. Hostility in depression. Psychological reports. 1994. V. 75. №. 3. P. 1391–1401.

24. Smith T.W. Hostility and health: current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health psychology. 1992. V. 11. №. 3. P. 139–150.

25. Smith, T.W., Sanders, J.D., Alexander, J.F. What does the Cook and Medley Hostility scale measure? Affect, behavior, and attributions in the marital context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990. V. 58. №. 4. P. 699–708.

26. Tuente S.K., Bogaerts S., Veling W. Hostile attribution bias and aggression in adults-a systematic review. Aggression and violent behavior. 2019. V. 46. P. 66–81.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up