Methodological problems of engineering psychology and ergonomics of the technogenic world

 
PIIS020595920020493-8-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920020493-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: St. Petersburg state University
Address: St. Petersburg, 199034, St. Petersburg, 7–9, Universitetskaya Emb
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 43 Issue 3
Pages25-33
Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the methodological basis of engineering psychology and ergonomics, in the context of the development of global technogenic environments. We have carried out a critical analysis of the current classical methodological system of ergonomics and engineering psychology. We have shown its limitations in solving problems arising from the creation of complex ergatic and sociotechnical systems, including artificial intelligence technologies, and have substantiated new research directions in the field of sociotechnical ergonomics within the framework of the post-non-classical paradigm of scientific rationality. Theoretical concepts based on models of cyclic self-organization, social induction, with the use of quantum-like reasoning, allowing to create constructive models for solving the issues of taking into account the human factor in the design of complex sociotechnical and ergatic systems and environments in the context of the evolution of the global technogenic environment, are considered.

Keywordsengineering psychology, artificial intelligence, methodology, post-non-classical engineering psychology, organized complexity, abduction, reduction, complex ergatic systems, technogenic world, technosymbiosis
Publication date23.06.2022
Number of characters25039
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 434

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Аssistivnye tekhnologii [Assistive technologies]. World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/ru/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology (accessed: 06.01.2022). (In Russian)

2. Bodrov V.A. Sovremennyj etap razvitiya otechestvennoj inzhenernoj psihologii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2009. V. 30. № 6. P. 66–80. (In Russian)

3. Bodrov V.A., Dikaya L.G., Zhuravlev A.L. Osnovny`e napravleniya i rezul`taty` inzhenerno-psixologicheskix issledovanij v Institute psixologii RAN. Aktual`ny`e problemy` psixologii truda, inzhenernoj psixologii i e`rgonomiki. Issue 2. Eds. V.A. Bodrov, A.L. Zhuravlev. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psixologii RAN”, 2011. P. 15–34. (In Russian)

4. Voloshin V.V. Abdukciya, gipoteza AD HOC i kontekst otkrytiya. Vestnik DonNU. Ser. B: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2020. № 2. P. 82–89. (In Russian).

5. Golikov YU.YA. Sovremennye koncepcii avtomatizacii i podhody k cheloveku i tekhnike. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2002. V. № 1. P. 18–30. (In Russian).

6. Golikov YU.YA. Vozmozhnost' ispol'zovaniya predstavlenij o celostnosti kak teoreticheskogo osnovaniya metodologii razrabotki vysokih tekhnologij. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya truda, 2020. V. 5. № 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.opwp.2020.15.2.001. (In Russian).

7. Golikov YU.YA. Razvitie konceptual'nyh predstavlenij o celostnosti kak teoreticheskogo osnovaniya metodologii razrabotki vysokih tekhnologij. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya truda, 2020. V. 5. № 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.opwp.2020.17.4.001. (In Russian).

8. Zhuravlev A.L., Lepskij V.E. Problema sub"ekta v inzhenernoj psihologii i ergonomike (upravlencheskij aspekt). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2018. V. 39. № 4. P.7–16. (In Russian).

9. Karpov A.A. Kognitivnye issledovaniya assistivnogo mnogomodal'nogo interfejsa dlya beskontaktnogo cheloveko-mashinnogo vzaimodejstviya. Informatika i ee primeneniya, 2012. V. 6. № 2. P. 77–86. (In Russian).

10. Kostin A.N., Golikov YU.YA. Organizacionno-processual'nyj analiz psihicheskoj regulyacii slozhnoj deyatel'nosti. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2014. 448 p. (In Russian).

11. Luchinin V.V. Formirovanie shestogo tekhnologicheskogo uklada. Evolyuciya biotekhnosfery. Biotekhnosfera, 2011. № 1–2 (13–14). P. 5–10. (In Russian).

12. Nikiforov G.S. Nadezhnost' professional'noj deyatel'nosti. S. Petersburg. Izd-vo S-Peterb. un-ta, 1996. 172 p. (In Russian).

13. Oboznov A.A., Akimova A. YU., Runec O.V. Fenomeny sverhdoveriya i sverhnedoveriya operatora k interfejsu “chelovek – iskusstvennyj intellekt”. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Organizacionnaya psihologiya i psihologiya truda, 2021. V. 6. № 2. DOI: 10.38098/ipran.opwp_2021_19_2_001 (In Russian).

14. Petrenko V.F., Suprun A.P. Vliyanie sistemy referencii na konstruirovanie obraza mira v psihologii i fizike, Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. V 42. № 4. P. 50–58. (In Russian).

15. Pirs CH. Nachala pragmatizma. Trans. V.V. Kiryushchenko, M.V. Kolopotina. S.Petersburg: Laboratoriya metafizicheskih issledovanij filosofskogo fakul'teta SPbGU; Aletejya, 2000. P. 301–310. (In Russian).

16. Rechinskij A.V., Sergeev S.F. Razrabotka pol'zovatel'skih interfejsov. YUzabiliti-testirovanie interfejsov informacionnyh sistem: ucheb. posobie. S.Petersburg: Izd-vo Politekhn. un-ta, 2012. 145 p. (In Russian).

17. Sergeev S.F. Inzhenerno-psihologicheskoe proektirovanie slozhnyh ergotekhnicheskih sred: metodologiya i tekhnologii. Aktual'nye problemy psihologii truda, inzhenernoj psihologii i ergonomiki. Eds. V.A. Bodrov, A.L. Zhuravlev. № 1. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2009. P. 429–449. (In Russian).

18. Sergeev S.F. Regulyaciya, samoregulyaciya, samoorganizaciya, samorazvitie v ponyatijnom bazise psihologii. Aktual'nye problemy psihologii truda, inzhenernoj psihologii i ergonomiki. № 4. Ed. V.A. Bodrov, A.L. Zhuravlev. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2012. P. 238–259. (In Russian).

19. Sergeev S.F. Nauka i tekhnologiya XXI veka. Kommunikacii i NBIKS-konvergenciya. Global'noe budushchee 2045. Konvergentnye tekhnologii (NBIKS) i transgumanisticheskaya evolyuciya. Ed. D.I. Dubrovskogo. Moscow: OOO “Izdatel'stvo MBA”, 2013. P. 158–168. (In Russian).

20. Sergeev S.F. Intellektnye simbionty v ergaticheskih sistemah. Nauchno-tekhnicheskij vestnik informacionnyh tekhnologij, mekhaniki i optiki, 2013. № 2 (84). P. 149–154. (In Russian).

21. Sergeev S.F. Ergonomika i inzhenernaya psihologiya tekhnogennogo mira: voprosy metodologii, teorii i praktiki. Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya psihologii truda i organizacionnoj psihologii Eds. L.G. Dikaya, A.L. Zhuravlev, A.N. Zankovskij. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2015. P. 47–56. (In Russian).

22. Sergeev S.F. Psihologicheskie aspekty robotizacii v evolyucii tekhnogennogo mira. Aktual'nye problemy psihologii truda, inzhenernoj psihologii i ergonomiki. № 7 Eds. A.A. Oboznova, A.L. Zhuravleva. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2015. P. 388–407. (In Russian).

23. Sergeev S.F. Psihologiya tekhnointegracii i tekhnomodifikacii cheloveka: teoretiko-metodologicheskij basis. Aktual'nye problemy psihologii truda, inzhenernoj psihologii i ergonomiki. № 8 Ed. A.A. Oboznov, A.L. Zhuravlev. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 30–49. (In Russian).

24. Stepin V.S. Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt, Al'ma Mater, 2015. (In Russian).

25. Strelkov YU.K. Inzhenernaya i professional'naya psihologiya: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedenij. Moscow: Izdatel'skij centr “Akademiya”; Vysshaya shkola, 2001. 360 p. (In Russian).

26. Hrennikov A.YU. Social'nyj lazer: Oruzhie massovogo porazheniya 21-go veka. [b. m.]: Izdatel'skie resheniya, 2021. 164 p. (In Russian).

27. SHvab K. CHetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyuciya. Moscow: “EksmoPress”, 2016. 138 p. (In Russian).

28. Haven. E., Khrennikov. A. Quantum social science; Cambridge University Press, 2013. 310 p.

29. Kahneman. D., Tversky. A. Prospect theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 1979. V. 47. № 2. P. 263–291.

30. Sergeev S.F., Khomyakov A.V. Operator’s perception of groups of dynamic objects. Journal of Optical Technology, 2021. V. 88. № 6. P. 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOT.88.000337

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up