Transformation of parameters of communications in the communicative behavior of youth in social networks

 
PIIS020595920009331-0-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920009331-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor of the Department of the Organization of Continuing Education of the Faculty of Continuing Professional Education
Affiliation: FGBOU V RNIMU named after N.I. Pirogov, Ministry of Health of Russia
Address: Moscow, Ostrovityanova str., 1
Occupation: Professor of the Department of Continuing Education, Faculty of Continuing Professional Education
Affiliation: FGBOU V RNIMU named after N.I. Pirogov, Ministry of Health of Russia
Address: Ostrovityanova str., 1
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Organization of Continuing Education of the Faculty of Continuing Professional Education
Affiliation: FGBOU V RNIMU named after N.I. Pirogov, Ministry of Health of Russia
Address: Ostrovityanova str., 1,
Occupation: head of Health Psychology and NeuropsychologyDepartment Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor
Affiliation: Kursk State Medical University
Address: Russian Federation, 305041, Kursk, st. K. Marx, 3
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
Edition
Pages78-91
Abstract

The article considers the possibilities of cognitive and pragmalinguistic approaches to the study of communicative behavior of users of social networks of the Internet. In two stages (in 2013–2014 and 2018–2019 years), the features of message parameters in the communicative behavior of young people in social networks were studied: the range and quality of speech units, communicative patterns and the modality of communication. The main sample was 155 accounts of young people (average age 21.2 ± 1.46). Using the methods of critical discourse analysis and functional pragmatics, 16,181 messages and 118 dialogues were analyzed. It is established that the message structure in the communicative behavior of youth in social networks is characterized by a transformation from verbal-figurative to figurative-symbolic. During the study period, an increase in the ambivalence of speech messages (up to 16%) and a decrease in the positive orientation of communicative strategies (a decrease in sympathy strategies from 255 to 187) and, as a result, the formation of non-constructive communicative patterns were revealed. A picture of the modality of the speech model of communicative behavior in the period 2018-2019. significantly different from the picture of 2013–2014. the prevalence of the negative modality of voice messages (43%) over the positive (41%) and the emergence of ambivalent voice messages (16%).

KeywordsCommunicative behavior, message parameters, communication pattern, communication modality, message subject
Received25.04.2020
Publication date04.08.2020
Number of characters34083
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1189

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Analiticheskij portal WeAreSocial. URL: https://wearesocial.com. (in Russian)

2. 14th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, ICCWS 2019; Stellenbosch; South Africa; 28 February 2019 – 1 March 2019. (in Russian)

3. Davydova Yu.V. Opredelenie tematicheskoj relevantnosti soobshchenij v zadache monitoringa virtual'nyh social'nyh setej dlya obespecheniya informacionno-psihologicheskoj bezopasnostilichnosti. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2019. V. 7. № 4. P. 11–18. (in Russian)

4. Mityagina V.A. Unifikaciya v kommunikativnom povedenii: fenomen vezhlivosti. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2005. № 3. P. 39–45. (in Russian)

5. Morozova A.A. Problemnye moment kommunikativnogo vzaimodejstviya v social'nyh setyah. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie. V. 93. 2014. № 26 (355). P. 76–80. (in Russian)

6. Nikishina V.B., Petrash E.A., Zapesockaya I.V. Lingvosemanticheskie harakteristiki kommunikativnogo povedeniya molodezhi v social'nyh setyah. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. № 5. P. 69–79. (in Russian)

7. Onlajn-portal statistiki Statista. URL: https://www.statista.com/. (in Russian)

8. Rippinen T.O., Slobodskaya E.R. Vzaimosvyazi lichnostnyh osobennostej podrostkov s povsednevnym ispol'zovaniem komp'yutera. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2014. V. 35. № 4. P. 30–37. (in Russian)

9. Ryazanova N.YU., Spercyan K.M. Sravnitel'nyj analiz metodov opredeleniya emocional'noj okraski soobshchenij v social'nyh setyah s primeneniem obucheniya s uchitelem. Novye informacionnye tekhnologii v avtomatizirovannyh sistemah. 2018. № 21. P. 417–423. (in Russian)

10. Sistema monitoringa social'nyh media “Brand Analytics”. URL: https://br-analytics.ru. (in Russian)

11. Terent'eva I.N. Setevye kommunikacii: novaya real'nost' upravleniya. Vestnik NGTU im. R.E. Alekseeva. Seriya “Upravlenie v social'nyh sistemah. Kommunikativnye tekhnologii”. 2016. P. 23–27. (in Russian)

12. Shpomer E.A. Princip kritiki v kommunikativnom povedenii: k problem sootnosheniya kommunikativnyh zakonov I tipologii yazykovyh lichnostej kommunikantov. Nauchno-informacionnyj zhurnal “Armiya i obshchestvo”. 2011. № 1(25). P. 45–49. (in Russian)

13. De Bruijn G.-J. To frame or not to frame? Effects of message framing and risk priming on mouth rinse use and intention in an adult population-based sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2018. V. 42, № 2. 15 April 2019. P. 300-314.

14. Guillot-Wright S. P., Lu Y., Torres E. D., et al. Design and Feasibility of a School-Based Text Message Campaign to Promote Healthy Relationships. School Mental Health. 2018. V. 10. № 4. P. 428–436.

15. Housley W., Webb H., Williams M. et al. Interaction and Transformation on Social Media: The Case of Twitter Campaigns. Social Media and Society. 2018. V.4. № 1.

16. Johnston C., Davis W.E. Motivating exercise through social media: Is a picture always worth a thousand words? Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 2019. V.41. P. 119–126.

17. Jorgensen M.V., Phillips L.G. Discourse-analysis. Theory and method. Kharkov: Publisher: Humanitarian centre, 2008.

18. Majid S., Lopez C., Megicks P., & Lim W.M. Developing effective social media messages: Insights from an exploratory study of industry experts. Psychology&Marketing. 2019. V. 36. № 6. P. 551–564.

19. Pancer E., Chandler V., Poole M., & Noseworthy T.J. How Readability Shapes Social Media Engagement. Journal of Consumer Psychology. V. 29. № 2. April 2019. P. 262–270.

20. Rubenking B. Emotion, Attitudes, Norms and Sources: Exploring Sharing Intent of Disgusting Online Videos. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019. V. 96. P. 63–71.

21. Swickert R.J., Hittner J.B., Harris J.L., Herring J.A. Relationships among Internet use, personality and social support. Computers in Human Behavior. 2002. V. 18. № 4. P. 437–451.

22. Tseng T.H., Hsieh S.H. Determinants of emoticon usage in mobile instant messaging: a construal level theory perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2019. V. 38. № 3. 4 March. P. 289–301.

23. Vashishtha S., Susan S. Fuzzy Rule based Unsupervised Sentiment Analysis from Social Media Posts. Expert Systems with Applications. 2019. V. 138, № 112834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112834.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up