All
 
|
 
 


Approbation of the error-oriented motivation scale by K.L. Schell (eoms)
 
PIIS020595920008571-4-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920008571-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Nina Pidbutska 
Occupation: Associate professor of Department of pedagogy and psychology of social systems management
Affiliation: National technical university “Kharkiv polytechnic institute”
Address: Kharkiv, Kharkiv, Kyrpychova street, 2, Ukraine
A. Knysh
Occupation: Associate professor of Department of pedagogy and psychology of social systems management
Affiliation: National technical university “Kharkiv polytechnic institute”
Address: Kharkiv, Kyrpychova street, 2, Ukraine
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 41 Issue 2
Pages127-138
Abstract

The article presents the results of approbation of The Error-Oriented Motivation Scale on the Russian sample (N = 467) (EOMS: The Error-Oriented Motivation Scale). The questionnaire allows to assess the level of respondent’s motivation in situations of mistake on one of three directions. The orientation of motivation to learn from mistakes reflects a person’s willingness to recognize mistakes, find and eliminate the causes of their occurrence, and is also an indirect indicator of positive self-attitude (Cronbach’s α – 0.777). The orientation of motivation to feel anxiety about making mistakes indicates a person’s obsession with avoiding mistakes, this manifests itself in repeated and intrusive double-checking of work results, which negatively affects the speed of its implementation, and also reduces the creative potential of activities (Cronbach’s α – 0.791). The orientation of motivation to conceal mistakes reflects a person’s need to maintain an image of infallibility in the eyes of others, which leads to a lack of reflection on the sources and causes of mistakes, and also does not contribute to personal and professional growth (Cronbach’s α – 0.749). A confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the three-factor structure of the questionnaire (χ2 =519.44, RMSEA=0.06, CFI=0.94, CI=0.9-0.6). As a result of testing, it was shown that the Russian-language version of the questionnaire is a valid psychometric tool with a high retest reliability, which can be used not only to assess the response to errors, but also more widely as a predictor of the respondent's professional or educational success.

KeywordsReaction to a mistake, achievement motivation, self-attitude, internality
Received23.02.2020
Publication date04.03.2020
Number of characters24380
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1738

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Boginskaja Ju.V., Gluzman Ja.A. Formirovanie motivacii dostizhenij u sovremennoj molodezhi. Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. 2016. № 1–4. P. 15–17. (in Russian)
2. Vindeker O.S. Vnutrilichnostnye determinanty motivacii dostizhenija. Izvestiia Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 1, Problemy obrazovaniia, nauki i kultury. 2010. № 1. P. 110–117. (in Russian)
3. Gordeeva T.O. Motivatsiia dostizheniia: teorii, issledovaniia, problemy. Sovremennaia psikhologiia motivatsii. Ed. D.A. Leontev. Moscow: Smysl, 2002. P. 47–102. (in Russian)
4. Gordeeva T.O. Motivatsiia: novye podkhody, diagnostika, prakticheskie rekomendatsii. Sibirskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2016. № 62. P. 38–53. (in Russian)
5. Kamneva E.V., Annenkova N.V. Vzaimosviaz motivatsii dostizheniia i stilia povedeniia v konfliktnoi situatsii. Psikhologiia tretego tysiacheletiia: sbornik materialov II Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno–prakticheskoi konferentsii Ed. B.G. Meshcheriakov. Dubna: Gosudarstvennyi universitet “Dubna”, 2015. P. 161–164. (in Russian)
6. Mirsaetova A.A. Motivatsiia dostizheniia uspekha lichnosti: psikhologicheskii aspekt. Srednee professionalnoe obrazovanie. 2010. № 5. P. 56–60. (in Russian)
7. Nastolnaia kniga prakticheskogo psikhologa. Sost. S.T. Posokhova, S.L. Soloveva. Moscow: AST: Khranitel; St. Petersburg: Sova, 2008. P. 141–157. (in Russian)
8. Panina I.N. Razvitie motivatsii dostizheniia uspekhov i drugikh, sviazannykh s trudovoi deiatelnostiu, kachestv lichnosti u sotrudnikov organizatsii. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2017. № 5. P. 257–259. (in Russian)
9. Psikhologicheskie testy dlia professionalov. Avt.–sost. N.F. Greben. Minsk: Sovremennaia shkola, 2007. (in Russian)
10. Rean A.A. Psikhologiia lichnosti. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2013. (in Russian)
11. Rean A.A. Prakticheskaia psikhodiagnostika lichnosti. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001. (in Russian)
12. Sorokina O.A. Razvitie motivatsii dostizheniia u studentov cherez professionalnye zadachi. Vestnik Ufimskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i servisa. Nauka, obrazovanie, ekonomika. Seriia: Ekonomika. 2015. № 1(11). P. 193–196. (In Russian).
13. Argyris C. On organizational learning. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1992.
14. Catino M., Pariotta G. Learning from errors: Cognition, emotions and safety culture in the Italian Air Force. Organizational Studies. 2013. V. 34(4). Р. 437–467.
15. Çikrıkci Ö., Topkaya Y., Yılar B., Zorluoğlu S.L. Structural Validity of Turkish Version of the Error Oriented Motivation Scale (EOMS) for University Students. The Online Journal of Counseling and Education. 2014. V. 3(4). P. 1–16.
16. DeShon R.P., Gillespie J.Z. A Motivated Action Theory Account of Goal Orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005. V. 90(6). P. 1096–1127.
17. Elliot A.J., McGregor H. A 2X2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. V. 80. P. 501–519.
18. Frese M. Error management in training: Conceptual and empirical results. Organizational Learning and Technological Change. Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences. Eds.: Zucchermaglio C., Bagnara S., Stucky S.U. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1995. V. 141. P. 112–124.
19. Kaplan A., Maehr M.L. The Contributions and Prospects of Goal Orientation Theory. Educational Psychology Review. 2007. V. 19. P. 141–184.
20. Keith N., Frese M. Effectiveness of error management training: A meta–analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008. V. 93. P. 59–69.
21. Kraig L. Schell The Error–Oriented Motivation Scale: An examination of structural and convergent validity [Electronic resource]. Personality and Individual Differences. 2012. V. 52. P. 352–356. URL: https://www.angelo.edu/faculty/kschell/downloads/Schell_EOMS2012.pdf  (last access: 14.05.2019).
22. Rybowiak V., Garst H., Frese M., Batinic B. Error Oriented Questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1999. V. 20. P. 527–547.
23. Seyle D.C., Swann W.B.,Jr. Being oneself in the workplace: Self–verification and identity in organizational contexts. LEA's organization and management series. Identity and the modern organization. Eds.: C.A. Bartel, S. Blader, A. Wrzesniewski. Mahwah, New Jersey, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2007. P. 201–222.
24. Van Dyck C. Mastering the dual challenges of errors: risk and uncertainty as contingencies for control and learning. Tijdschrift voor toegepaste Arbowetenschap. 2009. V. 2. P. 36–45.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up