THE ROLE OF THE PROGRAMME OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT IN ATTACHMENT DISORDER BEHAVIOR AMONG CHILDREN IN SUBSTITUTE FAMILIES

Occupation: professor, head of child and parent mental health and early intervention division at department of psychology
Affiliation: St. Petersburg University
Address: Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Liliya Aslamazova

Occupation: associate professor at the department of pedagogical psychology
Affiliation: Adyghe State University
Address: Russian Federation

E. Vershinina

Occupation: Senior researcher, laboratory of information technologies and mathematical simulation
Affiliation: Pavlov Institute of Physiology Russian Academy of Science
Address: Russian Federation

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 40 issue 3

Pages

53-63

Abstract

The study is aimed to examine manifestations of the attachment disorder behaviors in children with institutional experience living in substitute families, before and after the program of psychological support, in comparison with the behavior of children in families of biological parents depending on disability status and the degree of participation of substitute families in the program. The group of children in substitute families comprised 201 people (108 typical, 93 with disabilities, the age before the program – 4–10.5 years, after — 5–12 years), in biological families — 125 (65 typical, 60 with disabilities, age of assessment — 4.5–13.5 years). The support program consisted of 4 stages of activities directed to promote interaction between children and substitute caregivers and attachment development in children. The Attachment Disorder Сhecklist was used in the longitudinal study with an interval of about 17 months to assess the negative manifestations of attachment behaviors. The results show that for groups of typical children and children with disabilities in substitute families the mean group values of the attachment behaviors’ negative manifestations decrease after the support program in general and at the maximum and average, but not at the minimum degree of participation. After the program the mean group values of the negative manifestations in foster children is higher than in children in biological families, both in the group of typical children (for the total score and all areas) and children with disabilities (for the total score, in the social and emotional areas); the differences between children in substitute and biological families reduce with the increase of participation in the program. The results are discussed from the perspective of theoretical and empirical research data on effects of interaction and attachment based intervention programs on the behavior of children with institutional experience.

Keywords

children, typical and disabled, institutional experience, substitute family, attachment behavior, psychological support program

Received

28.03.2019

Publication date

25.04.2019

Number of characters

29839

Cite

GOST	Muhamedrahimov R., Aslamazova L., Vershinina E. THE ROLE OF THE PROGRAMME OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT IN ATTACHMENT DISORDER BEHAVIOR AMONG CHILDREN IN SUBSTITUTE FAMILIES // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2019. – V. 40. – issue 3 C. 53-63 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920004554-5-1 (circulation date: 14.10.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004554-5
MLA	Muhamedrahimov, R., Aslamazova, Liliya, Vershinina, E. "THE ROLE OF THE PROGRAMME OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT IN ATTACHMENT DISORDER BEHAVIOR AMONG CHILDREN IN SUBSTITUTE FAMILIES." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 40.3 (2019):53-63. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004554-5
APA	Muhamedrahimov R., Aslamazova L., Vershinina E. (2019). THE ROLE OF THE PROGRAMME OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT IN ATTACHMENT DISORDER BEHAVIOR AMONG CHILDREN IN SUBSTITUTE FAMILIES. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 40(3), pp.53-63 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920004554-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 2441

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agarkova V.V., Mukhamedrakhimov R.Zh. Osobennosti nablyudaemogo povedeniya detey v vozraste 5–8 let s opytom i bez opyta institutsionalizatsii. Psikhologiya — nauka budushchego: Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii molodykh uchenykh. 14–15 noyabrya 2017 goda, Moskva. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2017. P. 20–24. (in Russian)

2. Archakova T.O. EHkologicheskiy podkhod k rabote s zameshchayushchimi sem'yami v SSHA i Evrope. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya, 2012. № 3. P. 86–97. (in Russian)

3. Zakharova Zh.A. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie zameshchayushchey sem'i, prinyavshey na vospitanie rebenka iz uchrezhdeniya gosudarstvennogo popecheniya. Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova. 2015. V. 21. P. 216–220. (in Russian)

4. Makhnach A.V., Laktionova A.I., Postylyakova Yu.V. Rol' resursnosti sem'i pri otbore kandidatov v zameshchayushchie roditeli. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2015. V. 36. № 1. P. 108–122. (in Russian)

5. Oslon V.N. Organizatsionnaya model' psikhosotsial'nogo soprovozhdeniya zameshchayushchey sem'i. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2015. V. 7. № 2. P. 1–13. (in Russian)

6. Oslon V.N., Kholmogorova A.B. Psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie zameshchayushchey professional'noy sem'i. Voprosy psikhologii. 2001. № 4. P. 39–52. (in Russian)

7. Popova I.N. Aktual'nye problemy professional'nogo soprovozhdeniya zameshchayushchey semeynoy zaboty. Psikhologiya i pedagogika: metodika i problemy prakticheskogo primeneniya. 2012. № 26. P. 107–111. (in Russian)

8. Khanova N.A., Aver'yanova N.I., Minaeva N.V., Shipulina I.A., Zhuravleva Yu.V. Opyt mediko-sotsial'nogo soprovozhdeniya detey iz zameshchayushchikh semey. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. № 6. P. 62–69. (in Russian)

9. Shul'ga T.I., Sem'ya G.V. Osobennosti soprovozhdeniya zameshchayushchikh semey, vospityvayushchikh detey s OVZ: metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow: IIU MGOU, 2015. (in Russian)

10. Shustova L.P. Sistema psikhologo-pedagogicheskogo soprovozhdeniya zameshchayushchikh semey. Metodist. 2013. № 7. P. 61–63. (in Russian)

11. Ainsworth M.D.S., Bowlby J. An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 1991. V. 46. № 4. P. 333–341.

12. Brown J.D., Rodger S. Children with disabilities: Problems faced by foster parents. Children and Youth Services Review. 2009. V. 31. P. 40–46.

13. Chaffin M., Hanson R., Saunders B.E., Nichols T., Barnett D., Zeanah Ch., Berliner L., Egeland B., Newman E., Lyon T., LeTourneau E., Miller-Perrin C. Report of the APSAC Task Force on Attachment Therapy, Reactive Attachment Disorder, and Attachment Problems. Child Maltreatment, 2006. V. 11. № 1. P. 76–89.

14. Dozier M., Peloso E., Lindhiem O., Gordon M.K., Manni M., Sepulveda S., Ackerman J., Bernier A., Levine S. Developing evidence based interventions for foster children: An example of a randomized clinical trial with infants and toddlers. Journal of Social Issues, 2006. V. 62. P.767–785.

15. Kaminski J.W., Claussen A.H. Evidence base update for psychosocial treatments for disruptive behaviors in children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2017. V. 46. P. 1–23.

16. Muhamedrahimov R.J., Agarkova V.V., Vershnina E.A., Palmov O.I., Nikiforova N. V., McCall R.B., Groark C.J. Behavior problems in children transferred from a socioemotionally depriving institution to St. Petersburg (Russian Federation) families. Infant Mental Health Journal, 2014. Vol. 35. № 2. P. 111–122.

17. Nelson Ch.A., Fox N.A., Zeanah Ch.H. Romania's Abandoned Children: Deprivation, Brain Development, and the Struggle for Recovery. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 2014.

18. Nowak C., Heinrichs N.A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P-Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modeling: Effectiveness and moderating variables. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2008. V. 11. P. 114–144.

19. Reber K. Children at Risk for Reactive Attachment Disorder: Assessment, Diagnosis and Treatment. Progress: Family Systems Research and Therapy, 1996. V. 5. P. 83–98.

20. Rutter M., Beckett C., Castle J., Colvert E., Kreppner J., Mehta M., et al. Effects of profound early institutional deprivation: An overview of findings from a UK longitudinal study of Romanian adoptees. Wrobel G., Neil B. (eds.) International advances in adoption research for practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2009. P. 147–168.

21. Smyke, A. T., Zeanah, C. H., Fox, N. A., Nelson, C. A., & Guthrie, D. Placement in foster care enhances quality of attachment among young institutionalized children // Child Development, 2010. V. 81. P. 212–223.

22. Stern D.N. The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. NY: Basic Books, 1985.

23. The St. Petersburg–USA Orphanage Research Team. The effects of early social-emotional and relationship experience on the development of young orphanage children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 2008. V. 73. №3. Serial № 291. St. Petersburg, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009.

24. Tully L.A., Hunt C. Brief parenting interventions for children at risk of externalizing behavior problems: A systematic review // Journal of Child and Family Study. 2017. V. 25. P. 705–719.

25. Van Ijzendoorn M.H., Juffer F. Adoption as intervention: Meta-analytic evidence for massive catch-up and plasticity in physical, socio-emotional and cognitive development // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2006. V. 47. P. 1228–1245.