NATO's Pivot to the East: Motives and Problems

 
PIIS013128120028839-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013128120028839-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of the Center for Japanese Studies
Affiliation: Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of the RAS
Address: 32, Nakhimovsky Av., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Journal nameProblemy Dalnego Vostoka
EditionIssue 6
Pages9-20
Abstract

The article examines such a new phenomenon in world geopolitics as NATO's desire to expand its activities to the Asia-Pacific region. Along with Washington, in recent years, Western European states have been showing increasing concerns about China's growing economic and military relations, seeing it as a threat to their interests not only in the field of economics and technology, but increasingly in the field of security. China's economic, technological, and military-political ambitions are traditionally of particular concern to neighboring Japan. Promoting the idea of the indivisibility of the security of the Indo-Pacific and European regions, Tokyo intends to involve a number of European states in the geopolitical plan to contain China, despite the fact that geographically they are on the opposite side of the planet from China. The NATO leadership, which shares the concept of the indivisibility of the security of the two regions, in its own doctrinal documents, along with Russia, also brings China to the forefront as a threat to its security. In the Asia-Pacific region, NATO intends to strengthen security relations with Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. However, the coincidence of the interests of Japan and Western European states in containing the "rising China" makes Japan actually the main conductor of the expansion of NATO's activities in the Asia-Pacific region. At the NATO summit in Vilnius in 2023, Japan and the North Atlantic Alliance agreed on a document outlining 16 areas of cooperation until 2026. NATO's pivot to the Asian East causes wariness not only in Beijing and Moscow, but also in a number of Asia-Pacific countries. Critics of NATO's advance into Asia fear that it could lead to increased tension and destabilization in the field of regional security.

KeywordsChina, Russia, Japan, NATO, Indo-Pacific region, indivisible security, "Chinese threat"
Received03.11.2023
Publication date27.12.2023
Number of characters34738
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 5, views: 145

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Individually Tailored Partnership Programme between NATO and Japan for 2023–2026. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. July 12, 2023. URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_217797.htm?selectedLocale=en (accessed: 15.07.2023).

2. Hanssen Ulv, Hagström Linus. The errors of NATO’s East Asia engagement. East Asia Forum. August 25, 2023. URL: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2023/08/25/the-errors-of-natos-east-asia-engagement/ (accessed: 28.08.2023).

3. Kistanov V.O. «Global'naya Britaniya»: kurs na ATR s antikitajskim uklonom ("Global Britain": heading for the Asia-Pacific region with anti-Chinese slope). Vostochnaya Aziya: fakty i analitika. 2021. No. 3. S. 6–18. DOI: 10.24412/2686–7702–2021–3–6–18. (In Russ.)

4. Kistanov V.O. Kitaj kak fokus strategii YAponii v sfere bezopasnosti (China as the focus of Japan's security strategy). Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka. 2023. No. 3. S. 40–57. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120026064–1. (In Russ.)

5. Koga Kei. How AUKUS Plus could add to Indo-Pacific coalition building. East Asia Forum. November 1, 2023. URL: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2023/11/01/how-aukus-plus-could-add-to-indopacific-coalition-building/?utm_source=subscribe2&utm_medium=e mail&utm_campaign=postnotify&utm_id=2253034&utm_title=How%20AUKUS%20Plus%20could%20add%20to%20Indo-Pacific%20coalition%20building (accessed: 02.11.2023).

6. Narine Shaun. NATO should tread carefully in the Indo-Pacific. Asia Times. May 30, 2023. URL: https://asiatimes.com/2023/05/nato-should-tread-carefully-in-the-indo-pacific/ (accessed: 22.09.2023).

7. National Security Strategy of Japan. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. December 2022. URL: https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/siryou/221216anzenhoshou/nss-e.pdf (дата обращения: 05.03.2023).

8. NATO 2022 Strategic Concept. Adopted by Heads of State and Government at the NATO Summit in Madrid. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. June 29, 2022. URL: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept-ru.pdf (accessed: 15.09.2023).

9. Paramonov O. Kemp-Devid i «aziatskoe NATO» (Camp David and the "Asian NATO"). Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 23.08.2023. URL: https://interaffairs.ru/news/show/41896?ysclid=llxu2ehde9927966703 (accessed: 25.09.2023). (In Russ.)

10. Stoltenberg Jens. A Stronger NATO for a More Dangerous World. Foreign Affairs. July 10, 2023. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/europe/stronger-nato-more-dangerous-world-vilnius-jens-stoltenberg (accessed: 12.09.2023).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up