The Indo-Pacific Strategy of the Republic of Korea

 
PIIS013128120025775-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013128120025775-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of the Center for Korean Studies
Affiliation: Institute of China and Contemporary Asia Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 32, Nakhimovskiy Av., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Occupation: Leading Research Fellow, Center for Korean Studies
Affiliation: Institute of China and Contemporary Asia, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 32, Nakhimovskiy Av., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Journal nameProblemy Dalnego Vostoka
EditionIssue 3
Pages58-69
Abstract

The Indo-Pacific Strategy, formulated in the US National security strategy in December 2017, is a link in the global system of military-political blocs and associations. These structures have been created by the United States to preserve the dominance of the historical West in an era of global changes that challenge to the spread of the so-called unipolar world with the United States playing a dominant role worldwide. Moreover, it is clear that the more the role of the suzerain of the unipolar world is undermined, the more quirky, diverse and dangerous become the attempts to preserve this dominant role by involving countries that previously took a neutral position to the actions of the unilateralists.

 

The article analyzes South Korean policy regarding the Indo-Pacific Strategy. The authors of this article consider its political and economic aspects, including the role of the ROK in the institutionalization of the association, which includes countries that support it. At the same time, the authors premise that South Korea, being within the structure of the American global influence system for many decades, cannot ignore any American strategy. Therefore, discussion resolves around the pace and conditions that South Korea must fulfill in order to engage and implement this externally imposed structure, and what benefits it seeks to gain from its participation. At the same time, the authors express doubt in the possibility of transforming the Indo-Pacific block, being created under the auspices of the US, into a significant international structure capable of altering the vector of ongoing global changes. And this leads to the conclusion about how consistent with the national interests, even in the medium term, of the Republic of Korea and its participation in the American strategy of IPR. Moreover, the Indo-Pacific Initiative of the ROK, which has pro-American orientation, both in foreign policy and economic spheres, including priority (military industry, IT industry, "green" technologies, etc.), may inadvertently harm its own interests and cooperation with the main economic partner - China. This could result in adverse consequences for South Korea in the near future.

KeywordsRepublic of Korea, Indo-Pacific Strategy, ASEAN, cyber security, supply chain
Received03.04.2023
Publication date28.06.2023
Number of characters33020
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 85

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Belyj dom obnarodoval novuyu Indo-Tihookeanskuyu strategiyu SSHA (White House announced new Indo-Pacific strategy). TASS. 11.02.2022. URL: https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/13686677/ (accessed: 10.02.2023). ). (In Russ.)

2. Chips and Science Act. Congress.gov. 09.08. 2022. URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4346/text (accessed: 02.04.2023).

3. Choi Jae Duk. A Study on the Competition of the U.S.- China and Change of International Order. Voprosy natsionalnih I federativnyh otnoshenii. Issue 3 (96). Vol. 13. Pp. 1092-1109.

4. Koncepciya vneshnej politiki Rossijskoj Federacii. Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta RF 31 marta 2023 g (The concept of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation. Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation on March 31, 2023). Oficial'nyj sajt prezidenta RF. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/70811. (accessed: 01.04.2023). (In Russ.)

5. Manning, Robert. Indo-Tihookeanskaya strategiya SSHA (Indo-Pacific Strategy of USA). Rossiya v global'noj politike. 21.08.2018 URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/indo-tihookeanskaya-strategiya-ssha/ (accessed: 29.03.2023). (In Russ.)

6. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. December 2017, Washington, White House. 2017.

7. Putin V.V. Rossiya i Kitaj – partnyorstvo, ustremlyonnoe v budushchee (Russia and China – a partnership looking to the future). Oficial'nyj sajt prezidenta RF. 19.03.2023. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/70743 (accessed: 21.03.2023). (In Russ)

8. Sovmestnoe zayavlenie Rossijskoj Federacii i Kitajskoj Narodnoj Respubliki ob uglublenii otnoshenij vseob"emlyushchego partnyorstva i strategicheskogo vzaimodejstviya, vstupayushchih v novuyu epohu (Joint Statement of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China on deepening Comprehensive Partnership and strategic Cooperation entering a new era). URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/supplement/5920 (accessed: 22.03.2023). (In Russ.)

9. Strategy for Free, Peaceful, and Prosperous Ino-Pacific Region. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea. December 28, 2022. URL: https://www.mofa.go.kr/eng/brd/m_5676/view.do?seq=322133/ (accessed: 05.04.2023).

10. Summit for Democracy: Invited Participants. U.S. Department of State. URL: https://www.state.gov/participant-list-the-summit-for-democracy (accessed: 21.02.2023).

11. Zueva A.G. Sovremennye vyzovy ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva RK i SSHA (Modern Challenges of Economic Cooperation between the Republic of Korea and the United States). Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka, 2023. No. 1. S. 96–105. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120024220-3. (In Russ)

12. Zaklyazminskaya E.O. Al'yans Chip 4: protivorechiya storon i pozicii Kitaya (Alliance Chip 4: contradictions of the parties and China's position). Analytical materials of ICCA RAS. 03.02.2023. URL: https://www.iccaras.ru/analiticheskie-materialyi.html (accessed: 13.03.2023). (In Russ)

13. 김효정, 오수진, 김지연. 日에 구속력없는 '각자발표' 논란…2015년 위안부 합의와도 달라 (Kim Hyeo Hong, O Soo Jin, Kim Ji Eon. The Turmoil due to the Report of the Absence of the Duty of Japan...It Differs even from the 2015 Agreement on “Vianbu” ). Yonhap News Agency. 07.03.2023. URL: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20230307156800504?section=politics/all&site=editors_picks_ ews_view (accessed: 02.04.2023). (In Kor.)

14. 윤 석열 정부 120대 국정과제 (자유, 평화, 번영에 기여하는 들러벌 중추국가) (120 Objectives of the Policy of the Government of Yun Seok Yeol (Global State Contributing to Freedom, Peace and Prosperity)). 2022년 7월. 대한민국 정부. (In Kor.)

15. 한일정상 공동기자회견 발표문 (Text of the joint press conference following the summit of the leaders of the Republic of Korea and Japan). Yonhap News Agency. URL: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20230316170600001?section= politics/all&site =topnews01_related (accessed: 14.03.2023). (In Kor.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up