The Soviet Union and the May Thirtieth Movement in Shanghai

 
PIIS013128120021382-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013128120021382-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Assistant Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of History, Saint-Petersburg State University
Address: 5, Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation
Journal nameProblemy Dalnego Vostoka
EditionIssue 4
Pages128-143
Abstract

This article focuses specifically on the Soviet factor in The May Thirtieth Movement in Shanghai, including the degree of central and local Soviet authorities' involvement in the preparation and course of the Movement and financial assistance to Chinese strikers. It also examines Soviet intelligence activities in Shanghai during this period. Until May 30 the central organs of the USSR and the RCP(b) were not the initiators of the Movement. The largest workers' movement in Shanghai occurred spontaneously and was not under the control of the Comintern or the Politburo. However, we cannot completely deny the existence of attempts to organize and control the Movement by the Soviet Consulate as early as the first days of the strikes and it has been documented that the practical actions of Soviet agents began even before the Politburo began to pay attention to the Shanghai events. The All-Union Central Trade Union Council represented the "legal" support for the strikers by the Soviet authorities. The arrival of a delegation of Soviet trade unions in Shanghai was open and contained no elements of secret diplomacy. In the field of "secret politics", G.N. Voitinsky was sent to Shanghai to lead the Movement through the CCP. During the May Thirtieth Movement, Soviet intelligence had to work in intensified mode. However, in the Shanghai municipal police files we can only find references to the activities of Soviet spies at the beginning of the Movement. The reason for this is that all police attention in July and August was concentrated on the so-called "Dosser case", which was essentially of a small scale, but was hyped up by the Shanghai press and the Municipal Council of International Settlement. Nevertheless, one should not exaggerate the influence of the Soviets on the May Thirtieth Movement. The Soviets could only control, through the CCP and the General Trade Union, the workers' and partly the students' part of the strikes. The leading role in the May Thirtieth Movement was still held by the Shanghai merchants, not by the Politburo and the Comintern.

KeywordsShanghai, China, Russia, USSR, The May Thirtieth Movement, Russian Émigré, Soviet Intelligence, Revolution
Received23.05.2022
Publication date01.09.2022
Number of characters43332
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 260

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Antisovetskie podlogi, istoriya fal'shivok, faksimile i kommentarii (Anti-Soviet Forgeries, the History of Forgeries, Facsimiles and Commentary). M.: Litizdat NKID, 1926. 170 s. (In Russ.)

2. Balmasov S.S. Beloemigranty na voennoj sluzhbe v Kitae (White Émigré in Military Service in China). M.: ZAO Centropoligraf, 2007. 559 s. (In Russ.)

3. Kryukov V.M., Kryukov M.V. Vesna i osen' revolyucionnoj diplomatii: Pervoe desyatiletie sovetskoj politiki v Kitae (Spring and Autumn of Revolutionary Diplomacy: The First Decade of Soviet Policy in China). Vol. 2. M.: Pamyatnik istoricheskoj mysli, 2015. 608 s. (In Russ.)

4. Novejshaya istoriya Kitaya 1917–1927 (The Modern History of China 1917–1927) / pod red. M.I. Sladovskogo. M.: Nauka, 1983. 398 s. (In Russ.)

5. Peng Ming. Istoriya kitajsko-sovetskoj druzhby (The History of Sino-Soviet Friendship) / per. s kit. A.F. Kotovoj. Moscow: Izd. social'no-politicheskoj literatury, 1959. 360 s. (In Russ.)

6. Perepiska I.V. Stalina i G.V. CHicherina s polpredom SSSR v Kitae L.M. Karahanom: dokumenty, avgust 1923 g. — 1926 g (Correspondence of I.V. Stalin and G.V. Chicherin with Soviet Ambassador to China L.M. Karakhan: documents, August 1923–1926). M.: Natalis, 2008. 704 s. (In Russ.)

7. Sun Yizhi. Russkie shtrejkbrekhery i Dvizhenie 30 maya 1925 g. v Shanhae (Russian Strikebreakers and the May Thirtieth Movement in Shanghai). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 8, Istoriya. 2021. No. 4. S. 88–102. (In Russ.)

8. Tihvinsky S.L. Istoriya Kitaya. 1919–1949: bor'ba za ob"edinenie i nezavisimost' Kitaya (The History of China. 1919–1949: Struggle for the Unification and Independence of China). M.: Nauka, 2006. 716 s. (In Russ.)

9. Usov V.N. Sovetskaya razvedka v Kitae v 20-e gody XX veka (The Soviet Intelligence in China in the 1920s). ed. 2. M.: Dom Konfuciya, 2011. 384 s. (In Russ.)

10. VKP(b), Komintern i nacional'no-revolyucionnoe dvizhenie v Kitae (The All-Union Communist Party, Comintern and the National Revolutionary Movement in China) / pod red. Guo Henyv, M.L. Titarenko i dr. Vol. 1. M.: Buklet, 1994. 518 s. (In Russ.)

11. Yuriev M.F. Revolyuciya 1925–1927 gg. v Kitae (The Revolution of 1925–1927 in China). M.: Nauka, 1968. 518 s. (In Russ.)

12. Kotenev A.M. Shanghai: Its Municipality and the Chinese. Shanghai: North-China Daily News & Herald, 1927. 548 p.

13. 鄧中夏. 中國職工運動簡史 (Deng Zhongxia. A Brief History of China's Labour Movement). 上海: 新華書店, 1949年. 299 页. (In Chin.)

14. 维经斯基在中国的有关资料 (Material on Voitinsky in China). 北京: 中国社会科学院出版社, 1982年. 510 页. (In Chin.)

15. 五卅运动 (The May Thirtieth Movement). 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1991年. 第1卷. 612 页. (In Chin.)

16. 五卅运动 (The May Thirtieth Movement). 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1991年. 第2卷. 757 页. (In Chin.)

17. 姚金果, 苏杭, 杨云若. 共产国际,联共(布)与中国大革命 (Yao Jingguo, Su Hang, Yang Yunruo. The Comintern, All-Union Communist Party and the Great Chinese Revolution). 福州: 福建人民出版社, 2002年. 532 页. (In Chin.)

18. 中华民国史 (History of the Republic of China) / 李新主编. 北京: 中华书局, 2012年. 第5卷. 579页. (In Chin.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up