Implementation of Indo-Pacific military policy in North-East Asia and Chinas response

Occupation: Postgraduate student, the Faculty of World Politics
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: 1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation, Moscow State University

Journal name

Problemy Dalnego Vostoka

Edition

Issue 3

Pages

82-99

Abstract

This article examines the current structure of US military forces in Japan and South Korea and the implementation of the Indo-Pacific military policy of the United States in Northeast Asia, and briefly describes China's response to the Indo-Pacific military policy of the United States. Since the Second World War, the US has had huge national interests in Northeast Asia, and the region is one of the main areas in which the US promotes its democratic values and concentrates its military and strategic planning. In recent years, as China's military modernization has accelerated, the People's Liberation Army of China (PLA) has become increasingly active in East Asia and the Western Pacific. The rapid rise of mainland China is being felt by the US and is one of the main reasons why the US has shifted its attention to the Asia-Pacific region in the second half of the Obama administration's presidential term. The Indo-Pacific strategy is an important component of the US security strategy formally proposed by the Trump administration, and its effectiveness in Northeast Asia will largely determine the continuity and success of US strategy in the Indo-Pacific. The concrete implementation of US military policy in the Indo-Pacific region will inevitably affect the security situation in the region, change relations between countries in the region, and will also have an important impact on the future political landscape of the world.

Keywords

Indo-Pacific Strategy, Northeast Asia, US, China, Japan, South Korea, armed forces, security

Received

20.10.2021

Publication date

21.06.2022

Number of characters

46282

Cite

GOST	Wu Y. Implementation of Indo-Pacific military policy in North-East Asia and China's response // Problemy Dalnego Vostoka – 2022. – Issue 3 C. 82-99 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://pdv.jes.su/S013128120019371-9-1 (circulation date: 10.10.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013128120019371-9
MLA	Wu, Yanbin "Implementation of Indo-Pacific military policy in North-East Asia and China's response." Problemy Dalnego Vostoka 3 (2022):82-99. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120019371-9
APA	Wu Y. (2022). Implementation of Indo-Pacific military policy in North-East Asia and China's response. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka (3), pp.82-99 DOI: 10.31857/S013128120019371-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 681

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. A free and open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision. U.S. Department of state. 04.11.2019. URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf (accessed: 14.09.2021).

2. Adaptive Commands：Maintaining peace and security in a changing world // Indo-Pacific Defense Forum. July 30, 2018. URL:https://ipdefenseforum.com/2018/07/adaptive-commands/ (accessed:08.10.2021).

3. Benefits and Costs Associated with the U.S. Military Presence in Japan and South Korea // United States Government Accountability Office. March, 2021. URL: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21–270.pdf (accessed: 08.10.2021).

4. China's National Defense in the New Era // The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. 24.07.2019. URL: http://www.scio.gov.cn/ztk/dtzt/39912/41132/41134/Document/1660337/1660337.htm (accessed: 09.12.2021).

5. Global Britain in a competitive age. The Integrated Review of Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy // UK Government. 2021. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975077/Global_Britain_in_a_Competitive_Agethe_Integrated_Review_of_Security__Defence__Development_and_Foreign_Policy.pdf (accessed: 08.10.2021)

6. Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States. // Whitehouse. 11.02.2022. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific Strategy.pdf (accessed: 01.03.2022).

7. Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region // U.S. Department of Defense. 06.01.2019. URL:https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF (accessed: 14.09.2021).

8. Japan-U.S. Security Treaty // Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/q&a/ref/1.html (accessed: 08.09.2021).

9. Joint Leaders Statement on AUKUS // Whitehouse. September 15, 2021. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20210916023441/https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/09/15/joint-leaders-statement-on-aukus/ (accessed: 10.10.2021).

10. Korea tour normalization // 07.27.2010. URL: https://www.army.mil. (accessed: 08.07.2021).

11. Mutual Defense Treaty Between the United States and the Republic of Korea // Lillian Goldman Law Library. URL: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/kor001.asp (accessed: 08.12.2021)

12. National Defense Program Guidelines and the Mid-Term Defense Program// Ministry of Foreign Defense of Japan. URL: https://www.mod.go.jp/en/d_act/d_policy/national.html (accessed: 08.09.2021).

13. Pacific Command Change Highlights Growing Importance of Indian Ocean Area // U.S. Department of defense. May 30, 2018. URL: https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/1535808/pacific-command- change-highlights-growing-importance-of-indian-ocean-area/ (accessed: 08.09.2021).

14. Pacific Deterrence Initiative // Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. May 2021.

15. URL:https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2022/fy2022_Pacific_Deterrence_Initiative.pdf (accessed: 08.09.2021).

16. Rudd K. The Convenient Rewriting of the History of the ‘Quad’. Nikkei Asia, 03.26.2019. URL:Available at: https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/The-Convenient-Rewriting-of-the-History-of-the-Quad (accessed: 08.10.2021).

17. Strategic Competition Act of 2021 // The U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. 05.10.2021. URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1169/text (accessed: 08.10.2021).

18. Strel'tsov D. Indo-Tikhookeanskiy region kak novaya real'nost' global'noy sistemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (The Indo-Pacific region as a new reality of the global system of international relations) // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2018. No. 8. (In Russ.)

19. Tellis A. Waylaid by Contradictions: Evaluating Trump’s Indo-Pacific Strategy // The Washington Quarterly. 2020. Vol.43. No. 4. P.123–154.

20. Vergu D. Multi-domain Operations Rely on Partnerships to Succeed // U.S. Department of Defense. 12.02.2019. URL: https://www.defense.gov/explore/story/Article/1755520/multidomain-operations-rely-on-partnerships-to-succeed/ (accessed: 08.12.2021).

21. 蔡鹏鸿: “美军推进“印太”海上安全战略新动向:影响与挑战” (Cai Penghong. U.S. Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Strategy: Effects and Challenges) // 国际展望. 2020年. 第4期. (In Chin.)

22. 李岩, 达巍: “中美在亚太地区的安全矛盾: 演变与逻辑” (Li Yan, Da Wei. China-US Security Contradictions in the Asia-Pacific Region: Evolution and Logic) // 国际安全研究. 2020年. 第2期. (In Chin.)

23. 梁立昌: “新时期韩美同盟政策纷争、同盟协调、关系调整及其影响”(Liang Lichang. Policy Dispute, Alliance Coordination, Relationship Adjustment and Its Influence of ROK-US Alliance in New Period) // 当代韩国. 2020年. 第3期. (In Chin.)

24. 凌胜利: “亚太优先：美国亚太主导权战略探析” (Ling Shengli. Asia-Pacific First：Analysis of American Asia-Pacific Leadership Strategy) // 东北亚论坛. 2020年. 第2期. (In Chin.)

25. 刘宗义: “美国的全球战略枢纽建设及其影响”(Liu Zongyi. Geostrategic Pivots and U.S. Hegemony: Implications in the Asia-Pacific Region) // 国际展望. 2020年. 第4期. (In Chin.)

26. 吕晶华, 罗曦: “冷战后中美西太平洋军力对比的发展演变” (Lyu Jinghua, Luo Xi. The Evolution of China-U.S. Balance of Military Power in the Post-Cold War Western Pacific Region) // 美国研究. 2019 年. 第 3 期. (In Chin.)

27. 美国在亚太地区的军力报告(2020) (Report on U.S. Military Power in the Asia-Pacific Region (2020)) // 中国南海研究院. 2020. C. 49. URL:http://www.nanhai.org.cn/uploads/file/20200623/jlbg.pdf (accessed: 08.09. 2021). (In Chin.)

28. 宋文志: “体系压力、威胁认知与韩国在中美之间的战略选择” (Song Wenzhi. Sources of Threats, Threat Awareness, and ROK's Strategic Choice Between China and the U.S.) // 东北亚论坛. 2019年. 第4期. (In Chin.)

29. 王振宇: “对冲与制衡：日本印太战略的地缘政治逻辑与制约因素” (Wang Zhenyu. Hedge and Balance: the Geopolitical Logic and Restrictive Factors of Japan's "Indo-Pacific Strategy") // 日本研究. 2021 年. 第 1 期. (In Chin.)

30. 吴心伯: “拜登执政与中美战略竞争走向” (Wu Xinbo. China-US Strategic Competition under the Biden Administration) // 国际问题研究. 2021 年. 第 2 期. (In Chin.)

31. 肖晞, 樊丛维: “美日海权同盟的背景、特征及中国的战略应对” (Xiao Xi, Fan Congwei. The Background and Characteristics of the US-Japan Maritime Power Alliance and China's Strategic Response) // 东北亚论坛. 2020年. 第4期. (In Chin.)

32. 姚云竹: “中美军事关系:从准同盟到竞争对手?” (Yao Yunzhu. China-U. S. Military Relations: From Quasi-Alliance to Competition?) // 美国研究. 2019 年. 第 2 期. (In Chin.)