On the History of Formation of Modern Taiwan Stance on the Rights to Maritime Features and Area in the South China Sea

Occupation: Leading Researcher, Center for East Asia and SCO Studies, Institute for International Studies
Affiliation: Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Problemy Dalnego Vostoka

Edition

Issue 4

Pages

38-52

Abstract

The article highlights the history of formation of the official Taiwanese discourse on the problems of territorial affiliation and legal claims to the islands in the South China Sea. Two leading political parties of Taiwan (Guomindang and DPP) have substantial differences in their approach to the sovereignty on the features in SCS and “historical rights” to the sea. Details are given about reasons for emergence and disappearance of the concept of "historical waters" in the Taiwanese law, which allegedly should have been subject to the jurisdiction of the Republic of China. Taiwan's activities on the two features in the SCS aimed at demonstrating their "effective occupation" are highlighted. Official stance of different administrations and its changes are considered in detail. While sharing the same approach to the status of Taiping island, Guomindang and DPP disagree on affiliation of all other land features in the SCS. When considering the interpretation of the notorious "U-shaped line" by Taiwanese politicians, a conclusion is made about the actual proximity of the foreign policy stances of the PRC and the Guomindang, which are based on the idea of the common Chinese identity, revealed by significant part of the Taiwan inhabitants. As for the approach of DPP to the problem of SCS, the determining factor here is the Taiwanese identity of its supporters. This further complicates the situation: the DPP, on the one hand, proclaims sovereignty over all SCS facilities to demonstrate unity with PRC on the issue of China's territorial integrity, on the other hand — pragmatically recognizes the impossibility of actual exercising its nominal sovereignty over the disputed territories. Thus an obvious contradiction between theory and practice in the Taiwanese policy is revealed. The nuances of Taiwanese attitude to the award of the Hague Tribunal on the Philippines vs China case are elucidated. The reasons of the tribunal’s refusal to provide status of island to the biggest feature in Nansha group are determined.

Keywords

Taiwan, PRC, Guomindang, DPP, South China Sea, islands, territorial disputes, identity

Acknowledgment

The article was prepared with the support of the RFBR grant 20-514-07003 «Problems of the Development of Russian-South Ossetian relations and integration initiatives in the conditions of economic and diplomatic restrictions».

Received

24.03.2021

Publication date

20.08.2021

Number of characters

42331

Cite

GOST	Dikarev A. On the History of Formation of Modern Taiwan Stance on the Rights to Maritime Features and Area in the South China Sea // Problemy Dalnego Vostoka – 2021. – Issue 4 C. 38-52 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://pdv.jes.su/S013128120016121-4-1 (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013128120016121-4
MLA	Dikarev, Andrei D "On the History of Formation of Modern Taiwan Stance on the Rights to Maritime Features and Area in the South China Sea." Problemy Dalnego Vostoka 4 (2021):38-52. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120016121-4
APA	Dikarev A. (2021). On the History of Formation of Modern Taiwan Stance on the Rights to Maritime Features and Area in the South China Sea. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka (4), pp.38-52 DOI: 10.31857/S013128120016121-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 708

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Chung, Chris P.C. Drawing the U-shaped line: China’s claim in the South China Sea, 1946–1974 // Modern China, 2016,42, 1 (Jan.).

2. Dikarev A.D. Politicheskie i pravovye posledstviya verdikta gaagskogo tribunala po isku Filippin k Kitayu (The legal discourse and political consequences of the Hague tribunal award on Philippines vs. China Arbitration case) // Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae, Vypusk48. Chast'1. Moskva, Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, 2018. (In Russ.).

3. Hayton, B. The Modern Creation оf China’s ‘Historic Rights’ Claim in the South China Sea // Asian Affairs, 2018. Vol.49. Issue 33.

4. Hayton, B. The Modern Origins of China’s Claims in the South China Sea: Maps, Misunderstandings, and the Maritime Geobody // Modern China, 2019. Vol. 45(2). URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700418771678.

5. Hsiao, Anne Hsiu-An. Taiwan and the Arbitral Tribunal's Ruling: Responses and Future Challenges // Contemporary Southeast Asia, 2016. Vol. 38. No. 3.

6. Jennings R. New Taiwan Leadership Takes Tough Stance On Disputed South China Sea. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ralphjennings/2016/05/31/new-taiwan-leadership-extends-tough-stance-on-disputed-south-china-sea/?sh=2f70d8ca246f (accessed: 05.07.2021).

7. Joyner, Christopher C. The Spratly Island Dispute: What Role for Normalizing Relations between China and Taiwan? // New England Law Review, 1998. Vol. 32. Issue 3.

8. De Lisle, Jacques. Troubled Waters: China’s Claims and the South China Sea // Orbis, 2012. Vol. 56. Issue 4.

9. Nordhaug, Kristen. ‘Taiwan’s Policies in the South China Sea 1988–99 // Pacific Review, 2001. Vol. 14. Issue 4.

10. Song, Yann-huei and Yu, Peter Kien-hong. China’s “Historic Waters” in the South China Sea: An Analysis from Taiwan, R.O.C. // American Asian Review, 1994. Vol. 12. Issue 4.

11. Song, Yann-Huei and Zou Keyuan. ‘Maritime Legislation of Mainland China and Taiwan: Developments, Comparison, Implications, and Potential Challenges for the United States’ // Ocean Development & International Law, 2000. Vol. 31. Issue 4.

12. Sun, Kuan-Ming ‘Policy of the Republic of China towards the South China Sea’. Marine Policy Vol. 19. Issue 5. 1995.

13. Vasiliev D., Shavlai E. Yuzhno-kitaiskoe more v protiwostoyanii KNR i SHA v Azii (The South China Sea in the confrontation of PRC and USA in Asia) // Aziyai Afrika segodnya, 2020, 7 (In Russ.).

14. Wang, Kuan-Hsiung. The ROC’s Maritime Claims and Practices with Special Reference to the South China Sea // Ocean Development & International Law, 2010. Vol. 41.

15. Wilson, Kimberly L. Party Politics and National Identity in Taiwan's South China Sea Claims: Don't Rock the Boat // Asian Survey. Vol. 57, No. 2 (March/April 2017).

16. Wu, Jaushieh Joseph. The Future of U.S.-Taiwan Relations 14/05/2014. URL: http://thediplomat.com/2014/05/the-future-of-u-s-taiwan-relations (accessed: 25.07.2021).

17. Zou Keyuan. Historic Rights in International Law and in China’s Practice // Ocean Development & International Law, 2001.Vol. 32.

18. Zou Keyuan and Liu Xincheng. The Legal Status of U-shaped line in the South China Sea and its Legal Implications for Sovereignty, Sovereign Rights and Maritime Jurisdiction” // Chinese Journal of International Law”, 2015. Vol. 14. Issue 1.

19. 傅崐成.南海U 形疆界线的法律性质 // 社会观察 (3, 2014) (Fu Kuncheng. Legal character of the U-shaped border line in the South China Sea). (In Chin.). URL: https://www.guancha.cn/FuKunCheng/2014_04_01_214711.shtml?web (accessed: 05.7.2021).