The Informal Ties in the Japanese Bureaucracy: the Challenge to Legalism and Impersonalism

 
PIIS013128120015359-5-1
DOI10.31857/S013128120015359-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior Research Fellow, Center for Study of Common Problems of Contemporary East
Affiliation: Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameProblemy Dalnego Vostoka
EditionIssue 3
Pages85-100
Abstract

 The literal translation Japanese term amakudari is "descent from heaven" and derived from ama meaning heaven and kudari meaning decending. The term describes the practice of employing senior bureaucrats who have retired from positions in ministries to managerial positions in corporations, non-governmental associations overseen by these ministries. This government-officials-turned-managers practice is based on external and internal Jinmyaku ties. Amakudari relationships with their ministry ex-colleagues (co-Amakudari, pre-Amakudari) are mutually beneficial. It is considered among officials that through Amakudari the government is able to influence and control decision making in business. Private companies benefit through close ties to the government, using the retired bureaucrats. Amakudari and Watari practices help to acquire public contracts, delay inspections and ensure various forms of preferential treatment through Jinmyaku network. In spite of officials-turned-managers practice is allowed byJapan’s National Civil Service Law 2008 only 2 years after leaving government service, ministries continue to help the post retirement and before retirement officials in seeking jobs.

This article seeks to analyze and map Amakudari and Jinmyaku patterns from perspectives of an institutional and a social network theories. The author makes attempt to compare Jinmyaku with other informal relations, based on group loyalty, reciprocity, benefits received, known as Chinese and Arab Cultural Constructs: Guanxi and Wasta. Interpersonal connections and networks are considered from perspective of traditional and rational motives creating group loyalty. The conclusion of the study is as follows. Amakudari practice, based on individual interests secured by group interests, challenges legalism and impersonality that create rational-bureaucracy legitimacy of the government.

KeywordsAmakudari, Jinmyaku, retired bureaucrats, corruption, informal ties, group loyalty, social network, interpersonal communication
Received07.06.2021
Publication date23.06.2021
Number of characters35045
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1248

Readers community rating: votes 0

1.  Acemoglu D. and J. A. Robinson.Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown Publishers, New York, 2012.

2. Asano Akihito and Takaharu Eto. The game theoretic analysis of the amakudari practice in the Japanese banking system. The Australian National University, 2003.

3. Bribery & Corruption, Ed.: Jonathan Pickworth & Deborah Williams, Published by Global Legal Group. 2014. URL: https://www.lw.com/thoughtLeadership/bribery-and-corruption-japan (accessed: 23.02.2021).

4. Burt R. S. Brokerage & Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

5. Carpenter S. Amakudari: The Ties that Bind the Bureaucracy with the Private and Public Sectors and Politics. In: Why Japan Can’t Reform. Palgrave Macmillan, London 2008.

6. Cheung, A.B.L. NPM in Asian countries, in T. Christensen and P. Lægreid (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2013.

7. Colignon Richard A. and Usui Chakako. Amakudai—The Hidden Fabric of Japan’s Economy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.

8. Cunningham R.B. and Sarayrah Y.K. Wasta: The Hidden Force in Middle Eastern Society, Praeger Publishers, 1993.

9. Druzhinin N.L., Misko O.N. Japanese Bureaucracy and Genesis of Amakudari // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2009, Ser. 5. Issue 2.

10. Erez M. Interpersonal Communication Systems in Organisations, and their Relationships to Cultural Values, Productivity and Innovation: The Case of Japanese Corporations // Applied Psychology, 1992, 41(1).

11. Filippov D.A. Ot liderstva chinovnikov k liderstvu politikov // Yaponiya nashih dnej. № 1 (11), 2012. Moscow: IDV RAN.

12. Fumio Hayashi. The 1990s in Japan: A Lost Decade. University of Tokyo, 2003. URL: http://fhayashi.fc2web.com/Prescott1/Postscript_2003/hayashi-prescott.pdf.

13. Horak, S. Jinmyaku (Japan), in A. Ledebeva (ed.), The Global Encyclopaedia of informality Volume 1. London: UCL Press, 2018.

14. Izotova N.N. Problems of transformation of values’ system in modern Japanese society. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2014;(2(35)).

15. Kanbu kōmuin no sōki taishoku kankō no zesei : (Rectification of Early Retirement Practices for Senior Civil Servants), 幹部公務員の早期退職慣行の是 2002. URL: http://www.jinji.go.jp/hakusho/h13/jine200202_2_062.html (accessed: 15.02.2021).

16. Kevenhörster, P., Pascha, W. and Shire, K. Japan. Wirtschaft Gesellschaft Politik. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 2003.

17. Kobayashi Kimio. Кokka kōmuin no amakudari konzetsu ni muketa kin'nen no torikumi : (Kimio Kobayashi Recent efforts to eradicate Amakudari of national civil servants) 小林 公夫 国家公務員の天下り根絶に向けた近年の取組 2012. URL: http://dl.ndl.go.jp/view/download/digidepo_3525594_po_073902.pdf?contentNo=1&alternativeNo= (accessed: 15.02.2021).

18. Kumon Shumpei. Japan as a Network Society, in S. Kumon and H. Rosovsky (eds.), Political Economy of Japan, Cultural and Social Dynamics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.

19. Li Ling. Lost in translation: the rule of guanxi, an alternative to the rule of law. In Michal Tomasek and Guido Muhlemann (eds.), Interpretation of law in China: Roots and perspectives. Karolinum Press, 2011.

20. Luo Yadong. The changing Chinese culture and business behavior: The perspective of intertwinement between guanxi and corruption. International Business Review, 2008, 17(2).

21. Mizoguchi Tetsuro & Nguyen Van Quyen. Amakudari: The Post-Retirement Employment of Elite Bureaucrats in Japan // Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2012, 14(5).

22. Mukaidani, Susumu et al. Ohkura Kanryo Amakudari Shisan Keibatsu Zen Risuto in Japanese, Bungeishunju No. 4, Bugeishunjusha, 1994.

23. Nakane Chie. Towards a Theory of Japanese Social Structure. An Unilateral Society, The Economic Weekly, 1965, 17(5–6–7).

24. Nyūsatsu dangō-tō kan'yo kōi bōshi-hō ni tsuite kōsei torihiki iinkai ni tsuite : (About the Act on Elimination and Prevention of Participation in Bidding, etc.) 入札談合等関与行為防止法について 公正取引委員会について 2013. URL: www.jftc.go.jp/dk/kansei/kanyoboushi.files/kanseileaflet02.pdf (accessed: 15.02.2021).

25. Quah, J.S.T. Curbing corruption in Asian countries an impossible dream? Bingley: Emerald, 2011.

26. Revolving Door Working Group. ‘A Matter of Trust: How the Revolving Door Undermines Public Confidence in Government — And What To Do About It’, 2005. http://www.cleanupwashington.org/documents/RevovDoor.pdf (accessed: 23.01.2021).

27. Sai shūshoku-tō kanshi iinkai : (Secretariat of Reemployment Surveillance Commission of Japan) 再就職等監視委員会 平成29年1月20日 20.01.2017. URL: https://www5.cao.go.jp/kanshi/pdf/houdou/290120/tyosakekka.pdf (accessed: 14.02.2021).

28. Scarborough Jack. The Origins of Cultural Differences and Their Impact on Management. Westport, CT: Quorum, 1998.

29. Shimizu Akitoshi. Ie and Dozoku: Family and Descent in Japan // Current Anthropology, Vol. 28, Number 4, I987.

30. Sōmu-shō Heisei 18-nen kara Heisei 20 nenmatsu made no sai shūshoku no assen : (Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Survey on the number of mediations for reemployment from 2006 to the end of 2008) 総務省 平成18年から平成20年末までの再就職のあっせん 2009. URL: http://www.soumu.go.jp/menu_news/s-news/02jinji02_000003.html (accessed: 15.02.2021).

31. Spiridonova N.V. Teoreticheskij analiz ekonomicheskih sistem (Theoretical analysis of economic systems), Moscow. YuRAJT, 2019.

32. Suzuki N. The Attributes of Japanese CEOs: Can They be Trained? // Journal of Management Development, 1989, 8(4).

33. Triandis H., R. Bontempo, M. J. Villareal, N. Lucca. Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Self-Ingroup Relationship // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54(2).

34. Van Rixtel Adrian. Informality and Monetary Policy in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

35. Weir S. A. Tribal Order Politics and Law in the Mountains of Yemen. Austin, University of Texas Press. 2007.

36. Wolferen Van K. The Enigma of Japanese Power. Tokyo: Charles E. Tuttle, 1993.

37. Yearend ban planned for 'amakudari,' 'watari', Kyodo News, Apr 1, 2009. URL: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2009/04/01/national/yearend-ban-planned-for-amakudari-watari/ (accessed: 23.01.2021).

38. Yokota Yumiko. Ending “Amakudari” Descent from Heaven at Last? Nippon Communications Foundation, May 22, 2017. https://www.nippon.com/en/currents/d00317/ (accessed: 13.01.2021).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up