All
 
|
 
 


Controversial Aspects of the Legal and Practical Framework for Intellectual Rights Disclosure by Chinese Listed Companies
 
PIIS013128120012849-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013128120012849-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Juia Magdalinskaya 
Occupation: Senior Lector
Affiliation: Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) run by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MGIMO)
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameProblemy Dalnego Vostoka
EditionIssue 6
Pages63-73
Abstract

The article raises the challenging issue of disclosing information on the presence and nature of intellectual rights in the reporting of public companies. The main drawback revealed by the analysis of the practice and legal framework established by Chinese regulators is inconsistency of systemic norms.

Public Chinese-based companies often treat the disclosure requirements in their commercial interests. Creation of a more perfect legal system should be aligned with envisaging a clearer and more consistent structure of disclosure documents and register system of facts on intellectual property subject to disclose.

It is advisable to use the PRC experience when creating a more perfect system of information disclosure by Russian public and non-public companies, since there are similar problems.

 
KeywordsIntellectual rights, listed companies, securities market regulator, patent, new technologies, reporting, initial placement
Received01.12.2020
Publication date15.12.2020
Number of characters28395
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 484

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Bao Xinzhong, Huo Huanhuan, Xu Yan. Research on the Construction and Empirical Research of the Intellectual Property Value Index of Science and Technology Enterprises (J).
2. Bingbin Lu. Disclosure Requirements for Patent Application: Article 29 of the TRIPS Agreement and a Dimensional Exploration // European Intellectual Property Review. 2012.
3. Chen Caiyun, Tang Xiangxi. On the Framework Design of China's Intellectual Property Information Disclosure System—Based on the Comparison of Chinese and Japanese Enterprise Intellectual Property Information Disclosure Systems (J) // Finance and Accounting Monthly. 2019 (21).
4. Chen Xiangling. Research on Intellectual Property Information Disclosure of Listed Companies (J) // Knowledge Economy. 2017 (05).
5. Chen Xiangling. Research on the Intellectual Property Information Disclosure System of Listed Companies (D). 2017.
6. Enterprise IPO Intellectual Property Risk Prevention and Dispute Resolution /Liu Mingjun // Law Press. July 2013. 1st Edition.
7. Guangzhou Huizhi Intellectual Property Information Consulting Co., Ltd. (J) // Enterprise Economy. 2015 (10).
8. Inquiry-type supervision to ensure the true and effective information disclosure of the science and technology board. Pan Helin // Securities Daily April 27, 2019.
9. Joshua S. Gans, Fiona E. Murray, Scott Stern. Contracting Over the Disclosure of Scientific Knowledge: Intellectual Property and Academic Publication(J) // Research Policy. 2017.
10. Li Hong. Analysis of Japan ’s Intellectual Property Information Disclosure Guide and Its Enlightenment to China (J) // Library and Information Service. 2010 (02).
11. Li Hong. Analysis on Intellectual Property Information Disclosure of China's GEM Listed Companies (J) // Library and Information Service. 2010 (16).
12. Li Hong, Wu Mengfan. Analysis on the Status Quo of Intellectual Property Information Disclosure in China's GEM Listed Companies (J) // Friends of Accounting. 2014 (18).
13. Li Hong, Wu Mengfan. Research on Intellectual Property Information Disclosure of GEM Listed Companies (J) // Finance and Accounting Newsletter. 2012 (36).
14. Li Xirui. On the Construction and Improvement of China's Intellectual Property Information Public Service System (J) // Heilongjiang Social Science. 2014 (02).
15. Liu Rong, Wei Tie, Li Panpan. Development Strategy of Guangxi Intellectual Property Information Service Industry (J) // China Science and Technology Information. 2015 (07).
16. Possible Risks in China's Science and Technology Innovation Board Market and Prevention of Tan Chunzhi et al // Accounting Monthly. May, 2019.
17. Status Quo and Problems of Intellectual Property Information Disclosure in the Growth Enterprise Market (J) /Sun Wenjing, Yuan Zhenfu. // Chinese Invention and Patent. 2012 (03).
18. Sun Yurong. Development of Internet Cultural Industry and Protection of Intellectual Property (J) // Journal of Beijing Union University (Humanities and Social Sciences). 2016 (02).
19. Sun Wenjing, Yuan Zhenfu. Analysis on the Status Quo and Problems of Intellectual Property Information Disclosure in the Growth Enterprise Market (J) // China Invention & Patent. 2012 (03).
20. Wang Haisu, Fang Zhongxiu. Information Disclosure and Market Inspection of Intangible Assets: Based on Shenzhen GEM Listed Company Data (J) // China Industrial Economy. 2012 (08).
21. Zhou Wen, Wang Chuan. Intellectual Property Information Disclosure: Status, Problems and Countermeasures (J) // Business Accounting. 2013 (07).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up