The Choice of the Optimal Integration Paradigm in Eurasia

The article presents the idea of an integration project for Eurasia, the purpose of which is to expand the discussion in this direction. Currently, the initiators of the integration process in Eurasia are, first of all, the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China, which are seeking new resources for economic growth in the conditions of the growing global financial crisis. Building the Eurasian community Moscow and Beijing see the most realistic integration paradigm in the creation of an effective consultation mechanism that allows to bring together positions on key global issues.

Keywords

Eurasia, ideology, Russia, China, integration

Received

11.06.2019

Publication date

25.06.2019

Number of characters

26443

Cite

GOST	Balakin V. The Choice of the Optimal Integration Paradigm in Eurasia // Problemy Dalnego Vostoka – 2019. – Issue 3 C. 130-136 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://pdv.jes.su/S013128120005307-8-1 (circulation date: 18.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013128120005307-8
MLA	Balakin, Vyacheslav "The Choice of the Optimal Integration Paradigm in Eurasia." Problemy Dalnego Vostoka 3 (2019):130-136. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120005307-8
APA	Balakin V. (2019). The Choice of the Optimal Integration Paradigm in Eurasia. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka (3), pp.130-136 DOI: 10.31857/S013128120005307-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1187

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. . Svirac Ante. Die Figur des Fluchtlings als ein Paradigma. Universitat Wien Verlag, Wien, 2007. S.19.

2. . Masuda Masayuki. Chugoku gaiko then kokusi sistemu: [Chinese diplomacy and the international system] // Boei Kenkyushyou no tes. Boei daigaku. Tokyo, 2005. p. 80.

3. . Clark David L. Kants Aliens. The Anthropology and Its Others // The New Centennial Review. Michigan State University Press. 2001. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 201-289.

4. . Lin Limin. Shijie diyuan zhengzhi xinbianjuyu yu zhunguo de zhalyue dezhi: [Political changes in the world arena and noticeable changes in the strategy of the PRC] Xyandai guoji Beijing 2010. No. 4. P. 6.

5. . Milhiet Paco. Chinas international geopolitical issues / The French Institute for International Affairs and Strategic Affairs. Asia Focus Program. Paris, 2017. P. 3.

6. . Libman, Alexander. Engische Direction Continental Eurasien / Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik Deutsches Institut fur Internationale Politik und Sicherheit. Berlin, 2015. S.10.

7. . Tokoronagh Tomota. Vagakuni no yurashia gayko: [Eurasian diplomacy of our country)] / Nihon kokusai monday kenkyushyo. Tokyo, 2006. pp. 45.

8. . Abdelal Rawi. Memories of Nations and States: Institutional History and National Identity in Eurasia // Nationalities Papers, Vol. 30. No. 3. Harvard University. 2002. P. 478.

9. . Yan Liang. Zhongguo dui Weizi jiu chai: mubiao yu zhentse ichi: [China against foreign economic sanctions: goals and political agenda] // Weiziao Pinlun. 2012. No. 6. P. 18.

10. . Schmidt-Feizmann. Instrument russischer Geopolitik. Policy Research Institute. Stockholm, 2018. P. 104.

11. . Stone Sweet, Alec. European Integration and Leagal System / Institute fur Hohere Studien. Vienna, 2005. P. 6.

12. . Rapp-Hooper Mira, Cronin Patrick M. Counterbalance: Red Teaming for the New American Security. Washington DC, 2016. P. 7.

13. . Muller Ruth, Damm Theresa. Asiens zweiter Sprung nach vorn / Berlin-Institut fur Bevolkerung und Entwicklung. GfK Verein Verlag. Nurnberg, 2014. S. 24.