All
 
|
 
 


Archaic paternalism as an organic part of the “power-property” system
 
PIIS086904990011421-5-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Natalia Pliskevich 
Occupation: Senior Researcher, Deputy Editor-in-Chief
Affiliation:
Institute of Economics Russian Academy of Sciences
Journal “Public Science and Modernity”
Address: 90 Profsoyuznaya St., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 1
Pages17-32
Abstract

The article attempts to explain why in the Russian conditions, along with the characteristic for the developed countries link between the ideas of liberalism and methods of modern paternalism there exist archaic paternalistic forms. It is shown that the archaism of paternalism largely results from the archaism of the institutional structure, which developed in the country by the early 2000s and only strengthened in the future – the relations system “power-ownership.” The role of responsibility of an individual for his life, as well as his “pater”, is considered, especially in case when the individual is free from any possibility to take an independent decision. Such monopolization by the “pater” of these duties in the modern hierarchical system of access to their execution generates the growth of aggressive adaptive individualism in the masses, which becomes extremely dangerous when the system is weakened.

Keywordspaternalism, individualism, liberalism, freedom, responsibility, “power-ownership”
Received10.09.2020
Publication date29.01.2018
Number of characters904
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 651

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Ahiezer A.S. (1997) Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opita (Sociokulturnaya dinamika Rossii). T. 1. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu [Russia: historical experience of the critic (Sociocultural dynamics of Russia). Vol. 1. From the past to the future]. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy hronograf
2. Auzan A.A. (2007b) Koleya rossiyskoy modernizacii [“Track” of Russian modernization]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 6, pp. 54–60.
3. Auzan A. (2007a) Pora reshitsya na pereuchrezhdenie gosudarstva [It is time to decide on the reestablishment of the state]. Rossiyskoe gosudarstvo: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Russian State: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow]. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo, pp. 407–422.
4. Bowles S. Moral’naya ekonomika. Pochemu Horoshie ctimuly ne zamenyaut horoshih grajdan [The Moral
Economy. Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens]. Moscow: Institut Gaydara.
5. Burgin A. (2012) The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression. Cambridge (MA), London: Harvard Univ. Press.
6. Burgin A. (2017) Velikaya revolutsiya idey. Vozrozhdenie svobodnih rynkov posle Velikoy depressii [The Great
Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression]. Moscow: Mysl’.
7. Busigina I., Filippov M. (2012) Politicheskaya modernizaciya gosudarstva v Rossii: neobhodimostʼ, napravleniya, izderzhki, riski [The political modernization of the state in Russia: necessity, direction, costs, risks]. Moscow: Fond “Liberalnaya missiya”.
8. Chubarova T.V. (2017) Paternalizm v sovremennom obshchestve: ot produktovih kartochek do bezuslovnogo dohoda [Paternalism in modern society: from grocery cards to unconditional income]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 6, pp. 43–54.
9. Friedman M. (2005) Kapitalism i svoboda [Capitalism and Freedom]. Moscow: Fond “Liberalnaya missiya”: Novoe izdatelstvo.
10. Gorodeckiy A.E., Rubinshteyn A. Ya. (2017) Nekotorie aspekti ekonomicheskoy teorii gosudarstva [Some aspects of the economic theory of the state]. Moscow: IE RAN.
11. Grinberg R.S., Rubinstein A. Ya. (2000) Ekonomicheskaya sotsiodinamika [Economic Sociodynamics]. Moscow: ISE Press.
12. Grinberg R.S., Rubinshteyn A. Ya. (2013) Individuum & gosudarstvo: ekonomicheskaya dilemma [Individual & State: an economic dilemma]. M.: Ves mir.
13. Gudkov L.D. (2009) Usloviya vosproizvodstva sovetskogo cheloveka [Conditions for the reproduction of
the “Soviet man”]. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya, no. 2, pp. 8–37.
14. Diligenskiy G.G. (1997) Rossiyskie arhetipi i sovremennostʼ [Russian archetypes and modern times]. Kuda idet Rossiya?.. Obshchee i osobennoe v sovremennom razvitii. Pod obschey redakciey T.I. Zaslavskoy [Where is Russia going?.. General and special in modern development. Ed. by T.I. Zaslavskaya]. Moscow: MVSHSiEN; Intertsentr, pp. 273–279.
15. Harrison L. (2014) Evrei, konfucianci i protestanti. Kulturniy kapital i konec multikulturalizma [Jews, Confucians, and Protestants. Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturalism]. Moscow: Misl’.
16. Harrison L.E. (2013) Jews, Confucians, and Protestants. Cultural Capital and the End of Multiculturalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littefield.
17. Hellman J. (1998) Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transition. World Politics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 203–234.
18. Kapelyushnikov R.I. (2012) Nezatshchishchennost prav sobstvennosti i ee ekonomicheskie posledstviya: rossiysky opyt [The insecurity of property rights and its economic consequences: Russian Experience]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii, no. 1, pp. 61–75.
19. Levada Yu.A. (2011) Sochineniya: problema cheloveka [Compositions: the problem of man]. Moscow: Izdatel E.V. Karpov.
20. Lippmann W. (1934) The Method of Freedom. New York: MacMillan.
21. North D., Wallis D., Weingast B. (2011) Nasilie i socialnie poryadki. Konceptualnie ramki dlya interpretacii pismennoy istorii chelovechestva [Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Instituta Gaydara.
22. Nureyev R.M., Rounov A.B. (2002) Nazad k chastnoy sobstvennosti ili vpered k chastnoy sobstvennosty? [Back to private property or forward to private property?]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennostʼ, no. 5, pp. 5–23.
23. Obolonskiy A.V. (2016) Etika publichnoy sferi i realii politicheskoy zhizni [Ethics of the public sphere and the realities of political life]. Moscow: Misl’.
24. Obshchestvennoe mnenie 2016. Ezhegodnik (2017) [Public opinion – 2016. Yearbook]. Moscow: Levada-Tsentr.
25. Pliskevich N.M. (2016) “Path dependence” i problemi modernizacii mobilizacionnogo tipa [“Path dependence” and problems of modernization of the mobilization type]. Mir Rossii, no. 2, pp. 123–143.
26. Pliskevich N.M. (2010) “Sistema nizkih zarplat” institutsionalnaya lovushka postsocialisticheskoy ekonomiki [“The system of low wages” – institutional trap for the post-socialist economy]. Zhurnal Novoy ekonomicheskoy assotsiatsii, no. 5, pp. 125–146.
27. Pliskevich N.M. (2015) Transformatsiya sistemi vlasti-sobstvennosti v Rossii: regionalniy aspekt. Reformi i kachestvo gosudarstva [Transformation of the power-property system in Russia: a regional aspect. Reforms and the quality of the state]. Mir Rossii, no. 1, pp. 8–34.
28. Polterovich V.M. (2007) Elementi teorii reform [Elements of the theory of reform]. Moscow: Ekonomika.
29. Polterovich V.M. (2015) Ot socialnogo liberalizma k filosofii sotrudnichestva [From Social Liberalism to
the Philosophy of Cooperation]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 4, pp. 41–64.
30. Potentsial i puti razvitiya filantropii v Rossii. (2010) Pod red. I. Mersiyanovoy, L. Yakobsona [Potential and
the development of philanthropy in Russia. Ed. by I.V. Mersiyanova, L.I. Yakobson]. Moscow: HSE.
31. Rubinshteyn A. Ya. (2008) K teorii rinkov opekaemih blag [To the theory of markets of patronized goods]. Moscow: IE RAN.
32. Rubinshteyn A. Ya. (2009) K teorii rinkov opekaemih blag. Statya 1. Opekaemie blaga i ih mesto v ekonomicheskoy teorii [Towards the theory of markets of patronized goods. Article 1. Patronized goods and their place in the economic theory]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 1, pp. 139–152.
33. Rubinshteyn A. Ya. (2013) Opekaemie blaga v optike sravnitelnoy metodologii [Patronized goods in optics
of comparative methodology]. Moscow: IE RAN.
34. Rubinshteyn A. Ya. (2016) Socialniy liberalizm i konsociativniy paternalizm [Social Liberalism and Consociative Paternalism]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 2, pp. 5–38.
35. Rubinshteyn A. Ya. (2012) Socialniy liberalizm: k voprosu ekonomicheskoy metodologii [Social Liberalism: to the Question of Economic Methodology]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 6, pp. 13–34.
36. Sovetskiy prostoy chelovek: opit socialnogo portreta na rubezhe 90-h. (1993) Otv. red. Yu.A. Levada [Simple
Soviet people: the experience of social portrait at the turn of the 90s. Ed. by Yu.A. Levada]. Moscow: Mirovoy okean.
37. Socialnaya podderzhka: uroki krizisov i vektori modernizacii (2010) [Social support: lessons from the crisis
and the vectors of modernization]. Moscow: Delo.
38. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava (2005) pod red. S.S. Alekseeva [Theory of state and law. Ed. by S.S. Alekseev]
(www.be5.biz/pravo/t005/toc.htm).
39. Vovk V.N. (2010) Paternalizm v rossiyskom pravovom mentalitete. Krasnodar: Avtoref. kand. dis. [Paternalism in the Russian legal mentality. Krasnodar: Author's abstract. Cand. dis.] (http://av.disus.ru/avtoreverat/1736254–1-paternalizm-rossiyskom-pravovom-mentalitete.php). 
40. Zaslavskaya T.I., Shabanova M.A. (2012) Uspeshnye ekonomicheskie aktory kak potentsialnaya modernizatsionnaya obshchnost. Statya 1. Sotsialnye osobennosti i vzaimodeystviye v problemnoy institutsionalnoy srede [Successful economic actors as potential overhauled community. Article 1. Social features and interaction in the problem institutional environment]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennostʼ, no. 4, pp. 5–23.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up